• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Could a planet really develop a brain?

dlamberth

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2003
20,139
3,176
Oregon
✟928,077.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Politics
US-Others
Here's another take on AI and consciousness.

"But what if Spaceship Earth is itself developing (and indeed has already developed much of the infrastructure to support) a single emergent consciousness?"

"Could a planet really develop a brain? A mind? Would such an outcome be desirable, and could we thwart that development if not? I don't claim to predict what will happen, but rather what could happen. My contention is that Earth may, if we are lucky and diligent and clever enough, grow an emergent superconsciousness.


Could a planet really develop a brain?
 

SelfSim

A non "-ist"
Jun 23, 2014
7,045
2,232
✟210,136.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Meh .. maybe .. Maybe not.

I don't mind the conclusion at the end of the article .. (which basically neutralises the whole idea):
The more interesting question is; if we can say its already well under way, right here on Earth, why should it ever happen again elsewhere in the universe?
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,024
15,624
72
Bondi
✟368,755.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
One of the hard problem aspects for debate is whether consciousness needs to be carbon based or can it be inanimate silicon etc. Even though the conscious process (information in via different paths, mechanical, electrical and chemical processes) is relatively well understood, is there something about animate material that gives rise to qualia (assuming that it would be a requirement for consciousness).

There is the old thought experiment where you replace individual neurons with a silica replicant that does exactly the same job as the original. Do you lose consciousness for some reason as more neurons are replaced? If yes, then a planet wide consciousness is not viable. If no, then it must be possible.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Hood was a loser.
Mar 11, 2017
21,553
16,256
55
USA
✟409,085.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Where to they get these dumb ideas? Seriously, what is wrong with those people?
 
Upvote 0

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
30,158
8,498
Canada
✟880,397.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Sounds like the marvel universe.
 
Upvote 0

SelfSim

A non "-ist"
Jun 23, 2014
7,045
2,232
✟210,136.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Sounds like the marvel universe.
Whilst I'd agree that it sounds like sci-fi fodder, there appears to be organisations set up to further develop AI autonomy .. (no not the Terminator's parent company: 'Skynet').
Here's one such example: XenonStack's Automated Machine Learning page. Its suspiciously very high level stuff ... which would suggest someone's more creative musings, over actual substance .. but hey: this is typically how these things start out, no(?)
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

As an example of AI autonomous design, technically speaking, I don't see why AI can't be tasked with exploring areas that we humans already recognise as being beyond our present-day understanding. (Eg: Unexplored areas of AI's neural network architectures that human AI designers may have put in the 'too-hard' basket?)
 
Upvote 0

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
30,158
8,498
Canada
✟880,397.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Sounds like the institute from Fallout 4.
 
Upvote 0

SelfSim

A non "-ist"
Jun 23, 2014
7,045
2,232
✟210,136.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Here we go .. Artificial Neurons:
An artificial neuron is a mathematical function conceived as a model of a biological neuron in a neural network. The artificial neuron is the elementary unit of an artificial neural network.
Somewhat more disturbingly however:
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Hood was a loser.
Mar 11, 2017
21,553
16,256
55
USA
✟409,085.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Maybe if the planet was made of carbon or silicon. As it stands, the Earth is made of aluminum with cores of iron, so the probability of such a development for Earth is probably zero.
At least 5 elements are more abundant than aluminum in the Earth including iron, oxygen, and silicon.
 
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Critically Recalculating!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,570
11,468
Space Mountain!
✟1,354,106.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Hood was a loser.
Mar 11, 2017
21,553
16,256
55
USA
✟409,085.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Where are the OP et al. proposers building their fantasy planet brain?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,552
52,498
Guam
✟5,126,425.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Where are the OP et al. proposers building their fantasy planet brain?

Well you can't build one from scratch.

Even Frankenstein's brain was recycled.

(Okay -- the Frankenstein monster's brain.)
 
Upvote 0

SelfSim

A non "-ist"
Jun 23, 2014
7,045
2,232
✟210,136.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
I'm not at all clear that everyone has read the OP linked article(?)

As an aid to this discussion I'll quote from the article on what the author is talking about:
.. let's eliminate any possibility of confusion: I postulate the growth of an emergent neural network — one whose totality is not designed by humans, even if its initial constituent parts are.
A neural network is not a vertebrate or invertebrate brain.

I'm interpreting the topic as being about envisaging where an autonomously enabled AI might take itself in the future.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Gregory Thompson

Change is inevitable, feel free to spare some.
Site Supporter
Dec 20, 2009
30,158
8,498
Canada
✟880,397.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Reactions: 2PhiloVoid
Upvote 0

truthuprootsevil

Active Member
Mar 11, 2025
57
11
61
Houston
✟10,584.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Divorced
What if ..... From the scientific theories from the origin of life to the theory of evolution that tiny organism developed into what we see today and brainy. Through the most accepted process abiogenesis non-life sprouted life, chemical compounds, is there life within the earth herself or do she just sprout life. A brain is we view it as we know it, hard to imagine. But if the Earth could somehow form a brain most likely the first thing she would do is calculate a way to get rid of mankind.
 
Upvote 0

linux.poet

Barshai
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Angels Team
CF Senior Ambassador
Site Supporter
Apr 25, 2022
5,295
2,179
Poway
✟367,359.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
A neural network is not a vertebrate or invertebrate brain.

I'm interpreting the topic as being about envisaging where an autonomously enabled AI might take itself in the future.
Basically we’re doing the intelligent design argument all over again. Since all A.I.s are intelligently designed, could an A.I. the size of a planet develop itself from random chance and “disprove” human intelligent design for A.I.?

Even if humans (or other A.I.s) were overseeing the process, we would need tons of electricity, silicon, and other rare metals on the candidate planet to power a neural network that big and some method of cooling to deal with the heat.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

SelfSim

A non "-ist"
Jun 23, 2014
7,045
2,232
✟210,136.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Huh? Where did all that come from? (Its certainly not how I read the OP article). 'Random chance' never appears in it(?)

Eg: the author says: Essentially he's asking if it could organise the assembly of the basic piece-parts that humans have already put into place. Humans would still stay around in that future.

There's nothing about 'disproving human intelligent design for AI'(?)
 
Upvote 0