Could a Flying Fish be considered one of the...

[joey444]

"Show me a _________ with ________ and I'll consider evolution true." kind of gaps?

http://oceanlink.island.net/oinfo/biodiversity/flyingfish/flyingfish.html

 

[shernren]

No, because the gap most creationists harp on in the fossil record is a dino-bird gap, not fish-bird. We have lots of fish-bird intermediates: we call them amphibians and reptiles.

 

[Cannonflare]

No creationest say flying fishes are angles.

 

[Hydra009]

"Show me a _________ with ________ and I'll consider evolution true." kind of gaps?

http://oceanlink.island.net/oinfo/biodiversity/flyingfish/flyingfish.html

No, because such questions are always conveniently impossible even if evolution is true.

 

[Edx]

A good point to make is even if these flying fish lived mostly out of water and could settle on trees they could never be considered birds.

 

[joey444]

No, because such questions are always conveniently impossible even if evolution is true.

Yes, but since they don't understand what they're asking about, give them an answer that makes sense with their level of understanding.


Unanswerable question, flawed answer.