Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Cosmos map from Planck telescope
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blayz" data-source="post: 55160839" data-attributes="member: 197917"><p>Why, all of them, in fact. Astrology, alchemy, creationism to name a few.</p><p></p><p>Mate, yer a creationist. You wouldn't recognise logic if it donned a straw boater and rode into town on a giraffe yelling "I am logic!" You cannot really believe that your ridiculously low incredulity threshold, lack of comprehension and appalling ignorance are any kind of metric by which things deserve to be measured. </p><p></p><p>Every bit as hilarious as I was hoping for, A complete misunderstanding of the concept of "ape" and "human", and a strident claim about what we "must conclude". </p><p></p><p>Anyways, back to evolution for me. I have to check out some rat-human synteny to look for some target orthologs, and then make some decision on some CNV/LOH algorithms...actually AoS, given your expertise and track record in the matter, perhaps you could lend me your expert opinion? Do you think the segmentation granularity offered by PICNIC is worth the extra manually intensive analysis versus something more automated but that generates a coarser map, such as BIRDSEED?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blayz, post: 55160839, member: 197917"] Why, all of them, in fact. Astrology, alchemy, creationism to name a few. Mate, yer a creationist. You wouldn't recognise logic if it donned a straw boater and rode into town on a giraffe yelling "I am logic!" You cannot really believe that your ridiculously low incredulity threshold, lack of comprehension and appalling ignorance are any kind of metric by which things deserve to be measured. Every bit as hilarious as I was hoping for, A complete misunderstanding of the concept of "ape" and "human", and a strident claim about what we "must conclude". Anyways, back to evolution for me. I have to check out some rat-human synteny to look for some target orthologs, and then make some decision on some CNV/LOH algorithms...actually AoS, given your expertise and track record in the matter, perhaps you could lend me your expert opinion? Do you think the segmentation granularity offered by PICNIC is worth the extra manually intensive analysis versus something more automated but that generates a coarser map, such as BIRDSEED? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Cosmos map from Planck telescope
Top
Bottom