• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Constitutionality of Biden's Impeachment

Arcangl86

Newbie
Dec 29, 2013
12,115
8,363
✟417,514.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
So something occurred to me. Most of the talk about impeaching Biden is around his supposed actions as Vice President right? But he's no longer Vice President. And many Republicans claimed during Trump's second impeachment that he couldn't be impeached or tried because he was no longer in office. So doesn't that mean that Biden can't be impeached for anything that may have happened when he was VP?
 

HTacianas

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2018
8,876
9,492
Florida
✟376,919.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
So something occurred to me. Most of the talk about impeaching Biden is around his supposed actions as Vice President right? But he's no longer Vice President. And many Republicans claimed during Trump's second impeachment that he couldn't be impeached or tried because he was no longer in office. So doesn't that mean that Biden can't be impeached for anything that may have happened when he was VP?

See Spiro Agnew.
 
Upvote 0

Yttrium

Mad Scientist
May 19, 2019
4,544
5,047
Pacific NW
✟315,398.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
Single
So something occurred to me. Most of the talk about impeaching Biden is around his supposed actions as Vice President right? But he's no longer Vice President. And many Republicans claimed during Trump's second impeachment that he couldn't be impeached or tried because he was no longer in office. So doesn't that mean that Biden can't be impeached for anything that may have happened when he was VP?
I don't think that's really comparable. With Trump, there wasn't much point in impeaching him after he already left office. (Although he could conceivably have been prevented from running again.)

If we found that a president had committed a serious crime in the past, like murder, we would want him out of office so he could be arrested for it.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
43,726
46,790
Los Angeles Area
✟1,044,848.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
So something occurred to me. Most of the talk about impeaching Biden is around his supposed actions as Vice President right? But he's no longer Vice President. And many Republicans claimed during Trump's second impeachment that he couldn't be impeached or tried because he was no longer in office. So doesn't that mean that Biden can't be impeached for anything that may have happened when he was VP?

I think the GOP's argument was that the main punishment is removal from office, so it was moot by the time of the second impeachment. (However, the secondary punishment of disqualification from future office was obviously not moot.)

When the crimes occurred doesn't seem to be an issue.
 
Upvote 0
Aug 29, 2005
34,371
11,479
✟206,635.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private
I don't think that's really comparable. With Trump, there wasn't much point in impeaching him after he already left office. (Although he could conceivably have been prevented from running again.)

If we found that a president had committed a serious crime in the past, like murder, we would want him out of office so he could be arrested for it.
There was a point of impeaching trump after he left office. If the republicans would have voted for impeachment of trump, he would no longer be able to hold a federal position. We wouldn't be here talking about him every day.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
23,088
14,242
Earth
✟254,345.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
This round of “let’s impeach!” is fueled by the notion that “Joe is crooked”.

All else stems from this idea.

Some Biden made money!?
Investigate until what scam they were doing is revealed!

And hold a lot of press-conferences to tout “evidence”.

Joe took the train home to Delaware on the weekends because he was playing the long con.

Sure thing.
 
Upvote 0

JSRG

Well-Known Member
Apr 14, 2019
2,345
1,501
Midwest
✟236,781.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
There was a point of impeaching trump after he left office. If the republicans would have voted for impeachment of trump, he would no longer be able to hold a federal position. We wouldn't be here talking about him every day.
Impeachment removes someone from their position, but I don't think it forbids them from holding it in the future. I believe you have to re-impeach them to remove them again.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
43,726
46,790
Los Angeles Area
✟1,044,848.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Impeachment removes someone from their position, but I don't think it forbids them from holding it in the future. I believe you have to re-impeach them to remove them again.
It can be (but doesn't have to be) a two-step process:

Conviction immediately removes the defendant from office. Following the vote on conviction, the Senate may by a separate vote also bar the individual from holding future federal office, elected or appointed.
 
Upvote 0

A2SG

Gumby
Jun 17, 2008
10,016
3,939
Massachusetts
✟177,776.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Agnew was never impeached. How is he similar to Biden?
The DOJ wanted to indict Agnew on charges of criminal conspiracy, bribery, extortion, and tax fraud, and seemed to think they had a strong case with evidence and everything, despite Agnew maintaining his innocence continuously and promising to never resign. Eventually, Agnew pleaded no contest to a single charge of tax evasion and resigned.

I don't know of any similarities between Agnew and Biden, though.

-- A2SG, but your mileage may vary....
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
23,088
14,242
Earth
✟254,345.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
The DOJ wanted to indict Agnew on charges of criminal conspiracy, bribery, extortion, and tax fraud, and seemed to think they had a strong case with evidence and everything, despite Agnew maintaining his innocence continuously and promising to never resign. Eventually, Agnew pleaded no contest to a single charge of tax evasion and resigned.

I don't know of any similarities between Agnew and Biden, though.

-- A2SG, but your mileage may vary....
On the plus side, this scandal got Bill Safire to come up with “nattering nabobs of negativism”, for Ford’s predecessor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

A2SG

Gumby
Jun 17, 2008
10,016
3,939
Massachusetts
✟177,776.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
On the plus side, this scandal got Bill Safire to come up with “nattering nabobs of negativism”, for Ford’s predecessor.
Say what you want about Agnew, but that's a great phrase!

-- A2SG, no question.....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pommer
Upvote 0

Belk

Senior Member
Site Supporter
Dec 21, 2005
30,804
15,254
Seattle
✟1,195,481.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
So something occurred to me. Most of the talk about impeaching Biden is around his supposed actions as Vice President right? But he's no longer Vice President. And many Republicans claimed during Trump's second impeachment that he couldn't be impeached or tried because he was no longer in office. So doesn't that mean that Biden can't be impeached for anything that may have happened when he was VP?
If you are looking for consistency, politics is the wrong place to try to find it.
 
Upvote 0

Handmaid for Jesus

You can't steal my joy
Site Supporter
Dec 19, 2010
25,694
33,099
enroute
✟1,467,370.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
On the plus side, this scandal got Bill Safire to come up with “nattering nabobs of negativism”, for Ford’s predecessor.
Ford erred in pardoning Nixon imho.
 
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
23,088
14,242
Earth
✟254,345.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Ford erred in pardoning Nixon imho.
Nixon was popular, though, with the people.
Politicians didn’t like Nixon because his actions reflected poorly on them all.
Ford’s choice was to allow Nixon to face the full brunt of the criminal charges or the pardon which allowed the 37th retire in peace.
 
Upvote 0