Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Constants
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tom 1" data-source="post: 72080647" data-attributes="member: 404020"><p>Maybe the light reached your eyes more slowly than you expected? ;-)</p><p>Rupert Sheldrake has done some research on this and found the speed of light as recorded by physicists internationally dropped between 1928 and 1945, before going up again, by around 20km/sec, as one example. When he questioned one of the UK's leading physicists (the head of metrology at the UK's national physical laboratory) on this he was told that this problem had been 'fixed' by making the unit of measure variable (or something like that - refer to Sheldrake for more info), so that any further variations in the speed of light can be assigned to how it is measured. The gravitational constant, if that's the right term, is based on averages from regular international measurements that vary quite dramatically, according to Sheldrake. If you haven't come across him before Sheldrake is (or was?) a fellow in developmental biology at Cambridge uni.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tom 1, post: 72080647, member: 404020"] Maybe the light reached your eyes more slowly than you expected? ;-) Rupert Sheldrake has done some research on this and found the speed of light as recorded by physicists internationally dropped between 1928 and 1945, before going up again, by around 20km/sec, as one example. When he questioned one of the UK's leading physicists (the head of metrology at the UK's national physical laboratory) on this he was told that this problem had been 'fixed' by making the unit of measure variable (or something like that - refer to Sheldrake for more info), so that any further variations in the speed of light can be assigned to how it is measured. The gravitational constant, if that's the right term, is based on averages from regular international measurements that vary quite dramatically, according to Sheldrake. If you haven't come across him before Sheldrake is (or was?) a fellow in developmental biology at Cambridge uni. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Constants
Top
Bottom