anyone read this?
http://www.anabaptistchurch.org/community_by_elmo_stoll.htm
I liked this part (among others)
tulc(found this article very interesting)
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
tulc(found this article very interesting)But now be prepared to go into shock - my observations compel me to tell you that for most people living without wheels and gadgets is not the biggest hurdle. For most the most difficult challenge is learning to live in brotherhood and under what the Plain People consider a scriptural concept of church authority. Included in this part of the picture is the lack of privacy that brings forth exasperated comments like, "You people gossip so much! You're all so nosey. Why do people think they have a right to mind my business?" No doubt we do gossip too much, and our noses should be shorter. But that does not remove the part of the problem that results from having grown up in a society that puts a premium on independence and self-identity rather than a brotherhood's caring for one another. Living in a close community, everyone tends to know a lot about everyone else. This is not necessarily nosey. Living in brotherhood means sharing your life to a degree many people have not been used to. They discover that what they thought was normal may not be, and what strikes them as abnormal may actually be more in line with what God intended. Our lives are not our own. We are accountable to others, and others to us.
I read this 15 years ago, when I was contemplating joining the Bruderhof -and when Elmo was trying to persuade me to join his community.and the title should read: Community
anyone read this?
http://www.anabaptistchurch.org/community_by_elmo_stoll.htm
I liked this part (among others)
tulc(found this article very interesting)
I read this 15 years ago, when I was contemplating joining the Bruderhof -and when Elmo was trying to persuade me to join his community.
Elmos writing reflect his personality well. He was articulate, sensitive and wise. He was not very controlling but he certainly felt strong about the superiority of the Amish lifestyle even to the fine points of steel versus rubber tires on buggys. Elmo was a good listener too, in my experience. When I visited him in Cookeville, when several visitors were chatting he would ask a question and then sit back and listen. When a man who wanted to join the community started telling us about all the bad things in his current church that were the reasons for seeking at Cookeville, Elmo did not respond to the particulr concerns but instead asked the man to tell him ten good things about that church.Interesting, what was he like?
tulc(always curious)
Elmos writing reflect his personality well. He was articulate, sensitive and wise. He was not very controlling but he certainly felt strong about the superiority of the Amish lifestyle even to the fine points of steel versus rubber tires on buggys. Elmo was a good listener too, in my experience. When I visited him in Cookeville, when several visitors were chatting he would ask a question and then sit back and listen. When a man who wanted to join the community started telling us about all the bad things in his current church that were the reasons for seeking at Cookeville, Elmo did not respond to the particulr concerns but instead asked the man to tell him ten good things about that church.
I knew several people who joined the community, which changed over time into something very different from what Elmo described as his goal in his earlier writings.
I considered joining myself, but I could not see the value or a biblical case for "primative technology". I challenged Elmo to present a biblical case for the extremely primative lifestyle he advocated, and was very disapointed when he published it in his newsletter, as he really made no case at all. I have a whole stack of shared correspondence between us, as well as others. I'd love to see a biography. A professor at Vaderbilt is studyng Elmo and the community: http://sitemason.vanderbilt.edu/site/jRY7Ze . Read this account of Elmo too if you are interested: http://www.irawagler.com/?p=511
and the title should read: Community
anyone read this?
http://www.anabaptistchurch.org/community_by_elmo_stoll.htm
I liked this part (among others)
tulc(found this article very interesting)
We mentioned church structure. We are not a democracy where the majority vote rules. We commonly make a comparison between the natural family and the spiritual family. Just as the husband is the head of the natural family, so the bishop and ministers are responsible to watch over and care for the spiritual flock entrusted into their care. In the natural family, many times the husband abuses or is unworthy of his position. That calls for his repentance, but does not change what is God's order. The same is true in the church. Someone is responsible to lead and shepherd, and others are responsible to support and submit. Otherwise, there can be no godly order.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?