Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Why do you use the term "fall into"?Fords and Buicks do not fall into objective phylogenies. That's the whole point. Life does fall into objective phylogenies.
You mean like a duck-billed platypus?Now, can you tell me why God could not create a species with a mixture of DNA from several disparate species?
You mean like father and son?Then what pattern of shared DNA would a REAL connection produce?
Do you know the difference between microevolution and macroevolution?Loudmouth said:How would it be different from what we observe?
Why would you think that the duck billed platypus has DNA from various disparate species?You mean like a duck-billed platypus?
The duck-billed platypus testifies how science will make up anything to explain away exceptions to their paradigms.
That's why I refer to it as the "No True Scotsman Principle," rather than the "No True Scotsman Fallacy."
I don't.Why would you think that the duck billed platypus has DNA from various disparate species?
Why do you use the term "fall into"?
I submit that is one thing that is keeping you from understanding fully.
Scientists are adept at force fitting their philosophies into one coherent pseudohistory.
Thanks to computers.
I'm sure he did a fine job breaking ground.Linnaeus did a fine job of identifying the nested nature of all life on earth.
Without computers.
QV please: My Snowman Challenge II
Why do you use the term "fall into"?
I submit that is one thing that is keeping you from understanding fully.
Scientists are adept at force fitting their philosophies into one coherent pseudohistory.
Thanks to computers.
You mean like a duck-billed platypus?
The duck-billed platypus testifies how science will make up anything to explain away exceptions to their paradigms.
That's why I refer to it as the "No True Scotsman Principle," rather than the "No True Scotsman Fallacy."
No kidding?Your silly snowmen nonsense is not related to the simple facts of genetics.
Only computer programming and trial-and-error ... right?There is no "force fitting".
Catch up, chief.DogmaHunter said:And such a pattern is objectively, factually NOT present in productlines like cars or whatever. Not even in productlines from a single manufacturer.
Only snap-on parts ... right?There is nothing in the DNA of the platypus that violates the nested hierarchies of evolution.
No kidding?
It demonstrates instant creation with absolutely no ties to each other.
It shows how Genesis 1 can be literal, and how nested hierarchies at the macro level can take a hike.
Only computer programming and trial-and-error ... right?
It's more likely a Ford will give birth to a Dodge, than it is that the life in Genesis 1 appeared via evolution.
And since, as you and others pointed out, evolution has NOTHING to do with Fords and Dodges ... well ... what's that say for the likelihood of macroevolution?
Only snap-on parts ... right?
The platypus is a walking billboard for ontological reduction.
I think the problem is the way you insist on using words with, like, more than 3 syllables.Bumping for creationists who continue to claim that a nested hierarchy is predicted by common design.
Maybe he's a cruciverbalist?I think the problem is the way you insist on using words with, like, more than 3 syllables.
And there is the real question, and the one they will never, ever answer.Then what pattern of shared DNA would a REAL connection produce? How would it be different from what we observe?
Using my snowman analogy, it's like asking:And there is the real question, and the one they will never, ever answer.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?