Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
"Climategate" two years later
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="thaumaturgy" data-source="post: 58882997" data-attributes="member: 169303"><p>Well, let's start with the source <strong>you</strong> quoted: CBS NEWS:</p><p> </p><p><strong><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/03/30/tech/main6347584.shtml" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 12px">"Climategate" Researchers Largely Cleared</span></a></strong></p><p></p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.nsf.gov/oig/search/A09120086.pdf" target="_blank"><strong>National Science Foundation finds not evidence of data falsification</strong></a></p><p> </p><p><strong><a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/387/38708.htm" target="_blank">UK House of Commons Clears CRU researchers of academic dishonesty</a></strong></p><p><strong><span style="font-size: 12px"><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20009501-503544.html" target="_blank">An End to Climategate? Penn State Clears Michael Mann</a></span></strong></p><p></p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.uea.ac.uk/mac/comm/media/press/CRUstatements/oxburgh" target="_blank"><strong>Oxburgh Independent Panel Clears UEA Climate Group of charges of Impropriety</strong></a></p><p> </p><p>But I do find it interesting that you are asking me to "prove a negative" in a sense. Because there was never any evidence for scientific malfeasance, which means that these people have had to be treated as if guilty until proven innocent.</p><p> </p><p>I don't like that form of justice. I hope you don't either, but so far I've met so many AGW "Skeptoids" who think that "GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT" is the optimum system of justice.</p><p> </p><p>Maybe someday <em>you'll</em> be treated thusly. </p><p> </p><p>I bet your attitude would change then.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="thaumaturgy, post: 58882997, member: 169303"] Well, let's start with the source [B]you[/B] quoted: CBS NEWS: [B][URL="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/03/30/tech/main6347584.shtml"][SIZE=3]"Climategate" Researchers Largely Cleared[/SIZE][/URL][/B] [URL="http://www.nsf.gov/oig/search/A09120086.pdf"][B]National Science Foundation finds not evidence of data falsification[/B][/URL] [B][URL="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/387/38708.htm"]UK House of Commons Clears CRU researchers of academic dishonesty[/URL][/B] [B][SIZE=3][URL="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20009501-503544.html"]An End to Climategate? Penn State Clears Michael Mann[/URL][/SIZE][/B] [URL="http://www.uea.ac.uk/mac/comm/media/press/CRUstatements/oxburgh"][B]Oxburgh Independent Panel Clears UEA Climate Group of charges of Impropriety[/B][/URL] But I do find it interesting that you are asking me to "prove a negative" in a sense. Because there was never any evidence for scientific malfeasance, which means that these people have had to be treated as if guilty until proven innocent. I don't like that form of justice. I hope you don't either, but so far I've met so many AGW "Skeptoids" who think that "GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT" is the optimum system of justice. Maybe someday [I]you'll[/I] be treated thusly. I bet your attitude would change then. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
"Climategate" two years later
Top
Bottom