Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Christians, have you seen this!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Desk trauma" data-source="post: 64809853" data-attributes="member: 297432"><p><span style="color: Red"><Staff Edit></span></p><p></p><p></p><p>I do, actually. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The courts have ruled that in practice that clause includes the state remaining neutral not giving one view advantage over another.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>This case does not deal with the wider community, it deals with religious monument erected in public property.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>On their own property, not the publics. Unless the chance is open to all who want to put up a monument. If one view is allowed in, all must be.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I don't want religion stricken from public view, i just don't want the state putting it there on public property. Build a Mount Rushmore size ten commandments tablet if that makes you happy, just do so on your own dime and land.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>We must be looking at different monuments . The children are fully clothed and no sex acts are taking place</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Desk trauma, post: 64809853, member: 297432"] [COLOR=Red]<Staff Edit>[/COLOR] I do, actually. The courts have ruled that in practice that clause includes the state remaining neutral not giving one view advantage over another. This case does not deal with the wider community, it deals with religious monument erected in public property. On their own property, not the publics. Unless the chance is open to all who want to put up a monument. If one view is allowed in, all must be. I don't want religion stricken from public view, i just don't want the state putting it there on public property. Build a Mount Rushmore size ten commandments tablet if that makes you happy, just do so on your own dime and land. We must be looking at different monuments . The children are fully clothed and no sex acts are taking place [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Christians, have you seen this!
Top
Bottom