Christianity should not be too strict. Well, at least compared to Buddism and Hinduism, it has appears more strict.
There are many rules in Christianity. I am not saying these rules should not be applied, but more so, they should not be overstressed
When Christianity first came in to China, no one can really accept it. Taoist principles like honoring the dead ancestors were rejected by Christian missionaries. Where as Buddism was able to accept and adapt the culture of Taoism. Even today most of China, India, etc are not composed of mainly Christains. As well in Japan, Shintoism is mixed with Buddism, where as Christianity could not do such a thing. Henceforth there is only 1 percent of population in Japan that are Christians. I dont not deny that the fumie did kill many Christians, but one has to ask why was the fumie aimed mainly at Christains. it was because Buddishm and Shintoism were joined, but Christianity was still considered a Western influence.
People who concentrate on the rules of Christianity will never be able to spread the gospel. If you impose Christianity as a list of rules and orders, people will reject this form of Religion. People will see Christianity as a Western ideal.
Furthermore, if you impose God as one who punsihes and rewards, no one will want to believe in Him.
People wish to join a religion to relieve their suffering and to find hope. Jesus came down to earth to help peopl. Notice how he didnt ask the sick if they were Christians before He healed them. Nor did He go around critisizing individuals for their actions. In fact, Jesus criticized those who criticized others. Jesus was a being of understanding and love. He accepted all, even the outcast. He didnt care if they were believers of God or believers of something else.
I feel that Christians should not aim at mainly spreading the gospel, but should aim at helping people. For example, when a Hindu is trying to carry a dead friend to the river ganges for redemptions, A christian should not scorn him and say " God never said in the Bible that a river can give redemption. Repent and thou shall be saved!" Then you are no better than the priest that Jesus scorned. instead you should help him carry the body to the river ganges. Only then can people view Christainity not as a religion of pride and rigid Western Cultural rules, but as a universial benefit to all
There are many rules in Christianity. I am not saying these rules should not be applied, but more so, they should not be overstressed
When Christianity first came in to China, no one can really accept it. Taoist principles like honoring the dead ancestors were rejected by Christian missionaries. Where as Buddism was able to accept and adapt the culture of Taoism. Even today most of China, India, etc are not composed of mainly Christains. As well in Japan, Shintoism is mixed with Buddism, where as Christianity could not do such a thing. Henceforth there is only 1 percent of population in Japan that are Christians. I dont not deny that the fumie did kill many Christians, but one has to ask why was the fumie aimed mainly at Christains. it was because Buddishm and Shintoism were joined, but Christianity was still considered a Western influence.
People who concentrate on the rules of Christianity will never be able to spread the gospel. If you impose Christianity as a list of rules and orders, people will reject this form of Religion. People will see Christianity as a Western ideal.
Furthermore, if you impose God as one who punsihes and rewards, no one will want to believe in Him.
People wish to join a religion to relieve their suffering and to find hope. Jesus came down to earth to help peopl. Notice how he didnt ask the sick if they were Christians before He healed them. Nor did He go around critisizing individuals for their actions. In fact, Jesus criticized those who criticized others. Jesus was a being of understanding and love. He accepted all, even the outcast. He didnt care if they were believers of God or believers of something else.
I feel that Christians should not aim at mainly spreading the gospel, but should aim at helping people. For example, when a Hindu is trying to carry a dead friend to the river ganges for redemptions, A christian should not scorn him and say " God never said in the Bible that a river can give redemption. Repent and thou shall be saved!" Then you are no better than the priest that Jesus scorned. instead you should help him carry the body to the river ganges. Only then can people view Christainity not as a religion of pride and rigid Western Cultural rules, but as a universial benefit to all