I know that there are several secular way to meditate. But what is the Christian take on the subject and how are you supposed to do it?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I know that there are several secular way to meditate. But what is the Christian take on the subject and how are you supposed to do it?
I am far from an expert, but as I understand it, Christian meditation involves taking an event from Scripture and bringing it to mind, and then thinking on what happened, either from the standpoint of one of the people involved, or as a bystander. The crucifixion would be the most obvious example of this.
Catholics meditate on what they call 'mysteries' of the gospel when they pray the rosary. This meditation is productive of particular graces, because it prompts them to emulate those involved, or their behaviour.
In Anglican terms I think this is a subject that is often skirted around, but is not really treated consistently. I am aware that some so called 'Celtic' Christians do funny things with stones, candles and such, but that doesn't really appeal to me, so it is perhaps best described by someone who likes it.
Yes, some Anglicans do this sort of thing while others don't, but I haven't much heard the theory of it described or commented on by Anglicans. I tend to be wary, as the East sees this kind of meditation that uses the imagination as very dangerous, and I tend to agree.
Do you mean Orthodoxy?
As far as I understand it, Orthodoxy uses icons to draw us into the mysteries of Gospel events. Although the method used is very different, the intention is the same as praying the mysteries of the rosary; to make the Gospel real to us.
Orthodoxy has a far better understanding of this than the other apostolics. It even has the concept of theosis, which we reallu don't like to have much to do with. We tend to be a bit wary of mysticism, I think.
I agree that imagination on its own can be dangerous, but properly guided in ways honoured and sanctioned by the church it can also open a whole new way of finding God.
The East would include the EO, the OO, and the Eastern Catholics, and I suppose maybe the Christians in India descended from St Thomas, though I don't know much about how the latter deals with images or imaginative prayer.
Orthodoxy uses icons partly for just the reason I gave - to avoid the use of imaginative prayer, which is very easy to fall into accidentally. An icon is an image, but not imaginative - it is as much a scripted image as Scripture is a scripted word - so the image being used is known to be correct.
Imaginative prayer where one builds up a set of images of their own, or even makes up a story of ones own, is a bit different. It is very easy to create an image which is simply a product of imagination. And what that tends to mean is that one is praying to a product of one's imagination. (Screwtape gives an excellent explanation of this to Wormwood in The Screwtape Letters.) Some people also feel that it can create opportunities to be tricked by false images - it's not surprising in that light that the West, especially Catholicism, has so many reported visitations and apparitions - people often see what they expect to see, and are willing to accept as authentic what they want to be authentic.
Do you mean Orthodoxy?
Orthodoxy has a far better understanding of this than the other apostolics. It even has the concept of theosis, which we reallu don't like to have much to do with. We tend to be a bit wary of mysticism, I think.
The East would include the EO, the OO, and the Eastern Catholics, and I suppose maybe the Christians in India descended from St Thomas, though I don't know much about how the latter deals with images or imaginative prayer.
Orthodoxy uses icons partly for just the reason I gave - to avoid the use of imaginative prayer, which is very easy to fall into accidentally. An icon is an image, but not imaginative - it is as much a scripted image as Scripture is a scripted word - so the image being used is known to be correct.
Imaginative prayer where one builds up a set of images of their own, or even makes up a story of ones own, is a bit different. It is very easy to create an image which is simply a product of imagination. And what that tends to mean is that one is praying to a product of one's imagination. (Screwtape gives an excellent explanation of this to Wormwood in The Screwtape Letters.) Some people also feel that it can create opportunities to be tricked by false images - it's not surprising in that light that the West, especially Catholicism, has so many reported visitations and apparitions - people often see what they expect to see, and are willing to accept as authentic what they want to be authentic.
Thank you all. I can see the diverse perspectives through the discussions in this thread and it has been really helpful.
Mark1, I want to give you a special thanks for going in depth on the various commonly used techniques.
Something I ought to mention. Some years ago I used to go to retreats and not know why I couldn't meditate in the same way as other people.
Anyone who has anxiety issues may well find that attempting to meditate raises anxiety, and that they can't concentrate. For such people, like me, meditation is best accompanied by physical activity such as ironing, gardening, washing up; anything like that.
We can't all meditate in the same way.