Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Dude you don't even know what peer review is and my link refutes averything your links have said.
You've just been reported for insulting members here. You can not write well and that is a fact. If you can't accept that after three people have kindly told you then I don't know what to say.
No one has attacked you in any way. You simply refuse to take corrective criticism at face value.
I already posted the link on this thread and informed you of it several times. you even quoted the post with the link on it and bypassed it twice now. If you wish to go back and find it then do so.sir, you need to post your refutation.
you cannot simply say "this is refuted" without posting your source for that info.
others too, have claimed it refuted, again, same goes for them.
as far as I have seen, no refutation has been given.
let me explain.
I post something,
you google it.
the blog that you land on shows my source as faulty,
so you post it.
but you didn't actually look at their sources.
so if you have a direct link to a professional society regarding my sources then go for it.
if not, then it is your viewpoint, not mine that does not hold water.
what link?
there was two links posted, that were in reference to my post, one was off topic, the other was not scholarly enough.
the quotations I give are not from your typical blogger, but from someone who has numerous peer reviews.
I'll count this as a usless post.well reporting on false positives is a way to get the thread closed,
I highly advise only reporting flames or things that are not allowed on the forum.
here let me post it a third time, as you seem to be obviously dodging:
greg koukl of stand to reason ministries references this article by Wall Street Journal-
"
[P]olicy makers and the media are doing no favors either to the public or the transgendered by treating their confusions as a right
in need of defending rather than as a mental disorder that deserves understanding, treatment and prevention. This intensely felt
sense of being transgendered constitutes a mental disorder in two respects. The first is that the idea of sex misalignment is
simply mistaken—it does not correspond with physical reality. The second is that it can lead to grim psychological outcomes.
The transgendered suffer a disorder of "assumption" like those in other disorders familiar to psychiatrists. With the
transgendered, the disordered assumption is that the individual differs from what seems given in nature—namely one's maleness
or femaleness. Other kinds of disordered assumptions are held by those who suffer from anorexia and bulimia nervosa, where
the assumption that departs from physical reality is the belief by the dangerously thin that they are overweight….
Psychiatrists obviously must challenge the solipsistic concept that what is in the mind cannot be questioned. Disorders of
consciousness, after all, represent psychiatry's domain; declaring them off-limits would eliminate the field….
We at Johns Hopkins University—which in the 1960s was the first American medical center to venture into "sex-reassignment
surgery"—launched a study in the 1970s comparing the outcomes of transgendered people who had the surgery with the
outcomes of those who did not. Most of the surgically treated patients described themselves as "satisfied" by the results, but their
subsequent psycho-social adjustments were no better than those who didn't have the surgery. And so at Hopkins we stopped
doing sex-reassignment surgery, since producing a "satisfied" but still troubled patient seemed an inadequate reason for
surgically amputating normal organs.
It now appears that our long-ago decision was a wise one. A 2011 study at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden produced the most
illuminating results yet regarding the transgendered, evidence that should give advocates pause. The long-term study—up to 30
years—followed 324 people who had sex-reassignment surgery. The study revealed that beginning about 10 years after having
the surgery, the transgendered began to experience increasing mental difficulties. Most shockingly, their suicide mortality rose
almost 20-fold above the comparable nontransgender population. This disturbing result has as yet no explanation but probably
reflects the growing sense of isolation reported by the aging transgendered after surgery. The high suicide rate certainly
challenges the surgery prescription….
At the heart of the problem is confusion over the nature of the transgendered. "Sex change" is biologically impossible. People
who undergo sex-reassignment surgery do not change from men to women or vice versa. Rather, they become feminized men or
masculinized women. Claiming that this is civil-rights matter and encouraging surgical intervention is in reality to collaborate with
and promote a mental disorder."
http://www.str.org/articles/should-we-ban-conversion-therapy
above quote from STR.org
original source quote from http://www.wsj.com
- author Paul Mchugh
You gave links to a Christian website and a news article. If you don't know what peer review is then google it.I did give quotes of studies done on the peer review, at least twice.
And this is the same thing you have been posting and none of it is scientific
The first link is to a Christian website. The second is to a news item and the person you mark as the authoer is the same person who has been shown to have been working on an agenda in shutting down something he dislike. He is no more than a religious activist with a badge. Nothing more and nothing less.
it is very hard to prove agenda's.
everyone operates from a world view, so by default everyone has an agenda.
but to prove that one document, or work was the result of an agenda is very hard.
because it involves a formal fallacy called "guilt by association."
as well as other things.
but if you wish to repost your link, I will check it out and see if this is a valid source for you.
it is very hard to prove agenda's.
everyone operates from a world view, so by default everyone has an agenda.
but to prove that one document, or work was the result of an agenda is very hard.
because it involves a formal fallacy called "guilt by association."
as well as other things.
but if you wish to repost your link, I will check it out and see if this is a valid source for you.
You gave links to a Christian website and a news article. If you don't know what peer review is then google it.
Go....to...the...link...I....gave...you.
It provides all the evidence you need to make an honest assessment of wither he was working on an agenda.
I already posted the link on this thread and informed you of it several times. you even quoted the post with the link on it and bypassed it twice now. If you wish to go back and find it then do so.
You, by your own postings have displayed an incredible lack of knowledge and understanding of any of the subject matter and to continue debating someone who has proven himself to be so is a gigantic waste of time and effort.
You found a document that you agree with and you continue to flash that in every bodies eyes, while you try to perpetrate this fraud that you rely on science when in reality you have circled your wagons around something that you value above all else that has been proven false.
You are not fooling anyone and you are about to become a ignored member here because of it.
Go....to...the...link...I....gave...you.
hormones are ok to take as long as they suppliment what should be there.
look up "hormone treatment" for transvestites.
some male transvestites out there wish to look like a woman so they take hormones.
endocrine therapy I think it's called but not sure.
and no, insurance should not cover it, it's ridiculous.
- author Paul Mchugh
A 2011 study at the Karolinska
Institute in Sweden produced the most illuminating results yet regarding the transgendered,
evidence that should give advocates pause. The longterm study—up to 30 years—followed
324 people who had sexreassignment surgery. The study revealed that beginning about 10
years after having the surgery, the transgendered began to experience increasing mental
difficulties.
Businesses should be allowed to fire you for any reason they chose or you agreed they are allowed to in your contract.
that is stupid law I think. Businesses shouldn't have to bend over backwards for your conversion. You should just find another job that already accommodates you. Why put that sort of stress on the employer? You agreed to their policies. They have to change them for you? sounds selfish to me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?