Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Chimps and humans: How similar are we really?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pshun2404" data-source="post: 71382919" data-attributes="member: 301030"><p>For differences I see the main one is cranial capacity with a sagittal crest but also a distinguishable difference in the mandible in shape, type of canine teeth, they have a simian shelf, larger eye sockets (that restrict eye movement), a large protruding brow ridge (though some modern humans display this). The upper jaw is more u-shaped compared to a more relaxed arch-shaped jaw in humans. Pronounced nasal bone and cheek bones and a protruding chin are also absent in Australo.</p><p></p><p>Then the hands indicative of knuckle walking and tree climbing and spinal curvature is a big clue, and all apes even australo have a separated big toe or rear thumb that humans do not display. </p><p></p><p>I for one do not interpret stone tools found near to austrlo finds as indicative that they either made them or used them but indicative of early humans. I think the interpretation that they could make stone tools and use them is ludicrous and with a shred of evidence (it is hypothesis nased interpretation). And I already addressed the issue of their limited bi-pedalism and how that could have contributed to their extinction.</p><p></p><p>I hope this helped but if you are referring to alleged “in-between” creatures (Rampithicus, Habalis, Heidelbergensis, Erectus, etc.) then I again missed the point and would ask you to rephrase....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pshun2404, post: 71382919, member: 301030"] For differences I see the main one is cranial capacity with a sagittal crest but also a distinguishable difference in the mandible in shape, type of canine teeth, they have a simian shelf, larger eye sockets (that restrict eye movement), a large protruding brow ridge (though some modern humans display this). The upper jaw is more u-shaped compared to a more relaxed arch-shaped jaw in humans. Pronounced nasal bone and cheek bones and a protruding chin are also absent in Australo. Then the hands indicative of knuckle walking and tree climbing and spinal curvature is a big clue, and all apes even australo have a separated big toe or rear thumb that humans do not display. I for one do not interpret stone tools found near to austrlo finds as indicative that they either made them or used them but indicative of early humans. I think the interpretation that they could make stone tools and use them is ludicrous and with a shred of evidence (it is hypothesis nased interpretation). And I already addressed the issue of their limited bi-pedalism and how that could have contributed to their extinction. I hope this helped but if you are referring to alleged “in-between” creatures (Rampithicus, Habalis, Heidelbergensis, Erectus, etc.) then I again missed the point and would ask you to rephrase.... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Chimps and humans: How similar are we really?
Top
Bottom