Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Chimps and humans: How similar are we really?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pshun2404" data-source="post: 71365586" data-attributes="member: 301030"><p>Actually it can also be said, from a genetic point of view, that Sharks are closer to humans than they are to Bass...and IF there is Mayr's gap, THEN there are no "observable" facts. No observable fact makes the cross over, thus filling in the gap with hypothesis IS supposition (look it up it does not suggest it is made up out of thin air it is conjecture). So the evidence that there is no evidence should shape the hypothesis that <em>it is not an established fact</em> (teach it as one possibility), and all I am saying is that it should not be presented as established to students OR to the general public.</p><p></p><p>As for "the two what?" Apparently you are commenting without having read what I wrote.</p><p></p><p>The actual data (1) and the narrative we attach (2)!</p><p></p><p>Now I agree that absence of evidence does not mean evidence of absence but it does mean until there is sufficient evidence we are just filling in the gaps (which is fine but if we are being objective then they must be presented as only that)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pshun2404, post: 71365586, member: 301030"] Actually it can also be said, from a genetic point of view, that Sharks are closer to humans than they are to Bass...and IF there is Mayr's gap, THEN there are no "observable" facts. No observable fact makes the cross over, thus filling in the gap with hypothesis IS supposition (look it up it does not suggest it is made up out of thin air it is conjecture). So the evidence that there is no evidence should shape the hypothesis that [I]it is not an established fact[/I] (teach it as one possibility), and all I am saying is that it should not be presented as established to students OR to the general public. As for "the two what?" Apparently you are commenting without having read what I wrote. The actual data (1) and the narrative we attach (2)! Now I agree that absence of evidence does not mean evidence of absence but it does mean until there is sufficient evidence we are just filling in the gaps (which is fine but if we are being objective then they must be presented as only that) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Chimps and humans: How similar are we really?
Top
Bottom