Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Chimps and humans: How similar are we really?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tanj" data-source="post: 71364137" data-attributes="member: 396712"><p>If we ever get it past reviewers and published, I will provide a link.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>the two what?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think that is you projecting. There is no reason at all to think he believes that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's not what he's saying. He's saying there isn't any evidence for this aspect. There is a huge difference between</p><p></p><p>"the evidence between <em>Australopithecus and Homo </em>is missing<em>"</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>and</em></p><p><em></em></p><p><em>"t</em>he evidence between<em><em> Australopithecus and Homo </em></em>doesn't support the theory."</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Lack of evidence cannot shape anything.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again you use loaded words like "suppose" to suggest it's made up out of think air with out any evidence.</p><p></p><p>It's just not true.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I really hesitate to go into the latest hypotheses and evidences around the common ancestor, as fascinating as they are, because in the other thread you denied that bass are more closely related to humans than sharks. If you wont accept that, further discussion on a CA is pointless.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tanj, post: 71364137, member: 396712"] If we ever get it past reviewers and published, I will provide a link. the two what? I think that is you projecting. There is no reason at all to think he believes that. That's not what he's saying. He's saying there isn't any evidence for this aspect. There is a huge difference between "the evidence between [I]Australopithecus and Homo [/I]is missing[I]" and "t[/I]he evidence between[I][I] Australopithecus and Homo [/I][/I]doesn't support the theory." Lack of evidence cannot shape anything. Again you use loaded words like "suppose" to suggest it's made up out of think air with out any evidence. It's just not true. I really hesitate to go into the latest hypotheses and evidences around the common ancestor, as fascinating as they are, because in the other thread you denied that bass are more closely related to humans than sharks. If you wont accept that, further discussion on a CA is pointless. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Chimps and humans: How similar are we really?
Top
Bottom