Don't know whether anyone's been keeping tabs on YECist Todd Wood's blog lately, but I thought this latest posting might be of interest:
Todd's Blog: Chimp genome again
Todd's Blog: Chimp genome again
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
At least now you have a nice, concise argument that you can cite. One that comes from a devout YEC, no less.That's really impressive. He knows what he's talking about, and says it clearly. Now if he could just manage to get Mark Kennedy to understand it . . .
Keeping in mind that I don't really know much about this field, it shouldn't matter how close our genome is to apes in particular because don't we share 99% of genes with mice as well (or something like that?)
You might be interested in reading this:Keeping in mind that I don't really know much about this field, it shouldn't matter how close our genome is to apes in particular because don't we share 99% of genes with mice as well (or something like that?)
Keeping in mind that I don't really know much about this field, it shouldn't matter how close our genome is to apes in particular because don't we share 99% of genes with mice as well (or something like that?)
"The only reason chimps get the position as humanity's sister taxon among the apes is the repeated observation that they are the most similar of the apes to humans. "
Todd's Blog: Chimp genome again
I thought some were saying we're like Bonobos
We're not more closely related to one species of chimp than to the other. They're more closely related to one another than either species is to us. The point is that we're closely related to the genus Pan than to any other ape.So it doesn't matter which chimp we're supposed to be related (by behaviour) too? Because the two behave very very differently
We're not more closely related to one species of chimp than to the other. They're more closely related to one another than either species is to us. The point is that we're closely related to the genus Pan than to any other ape.
A chimp off the old block, perhaps?
What article?The article says it's not about genetics, but behaviour. But now it doesn't matter which chimp we're related to?
Todd's blog article? Where does it mention behaviour?Probably the one I quoted from in an earlier post which you responded to
Just a hint
Todd's blog article? Where does it mention behaviour?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?