razzelflabben
Contributor
why do you accuse me of rejecting something I didn't reject? I reject your manipulation and twisting and misrepresentation and conclusions of the word of God but not the word of God. and no, they are not the same thing...you see, if you have evidence to back your claim it would have been an easy thing to present it, no need for all the gyrations to get there.The destruction of the Chief Priests and Pharisees is testified by Christ to come via one event and one event only:
"The Coming of the Lord of the Vineyard"
I understand you reject this, but the scripture is quite clear.
wow, such a misrepresentation of what I said it becomes clear when you misrepresent me this bad why it would be so easy for you to misrepresent scripture and yourself so easily.Jesus IS the Lord of the Vineyard and also the Chief Cornerstone. Surely you don't also reject this scriptural fact?
42 Jesus said to them, “Have you never read in the Scriptures:
‘The stone which the builders rejected
Has become the chief cornerstone.
This was the Lord’s doing,
And it is marvelous in our eyes’?
43 “Therefore I say to you, the kingdom of God will be taken from you and given to a nation bearing the fruits of it. 44 And whoever falls on this stone will be broken; but on whomever it falls, it will grind him to powder.”
45 Now when the chief priests and Pharisees heard His parables, they perceived that He was speaking of them.
They knew He was speaking of them... interesting that you do not.
Jesus, the stone, indeed fell upon them and ground them to powder.
Upvote
0