Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Charles Robert Darwin
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ophiolite" data-source="post: 73968606" data-attributes="member: 234799"><p>This started me thinking. How did creationist arguments begin? As you have demonstrated, they have not evolved over time, in contrast to life. So, perhaps there was no equivalent to abiogenesis for the first creationist argument. Perhaps it just sprang into being like the spontaneous generation that supposedly produced geese from barnacles and mice from soiled clothing. Arguments, appearing from nowhere, fully formed, yet as ephemeral as a sea mist subject to the warming rays of the sun. And if ones arguments appeared in such a way it would be easy to suppose an analogous origin for, let's say, life. Hmm. Perhaps I should stop thinking. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ophiolite, post: 73968606, member: 234799"] This started me thinking. How did creationist arguments begin? As you have demonstrated, they have not evolved over time, in contrast to life. So, perhaps there was no equivalent to abiogenesis for the first creationist argument. Perhaps it just sprang into being like the spontaneous generation that supposedly produced geese from barnacles and mice from soiled clothing. Arguments, appearing from nowhere, fully formed, yet as ephemeral as a sea mist subject to the warming rays of the sun. And if ones arguments appeared in such a way it would be easy to suppose an analogous origin for, let's say, life. Hmm. Perhaps I should stop thinking. :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Charles Robert Darwin
Top
Bottom