1, "eradicate other people. kill them(repeating yourself)"
Evil/Harmful people would taken out painlessly(Sodom and Gomorrah), hence why YHWH(God: The Father and The Son and The Holy Spirit) never tortured them, but instead for example Stoning where it would be painless as it renders you unconscious, or fire and brimstone where fire would destroy nerves rendering the evil/harmful person without any pain.
Only for them to be Resurrected later, 1 Thessalonians 4.
2, Enslave? Nope, Indentured Servitude.
3, Burn their cities, see Sodom and Gomorrah, painless and cities were burned to remove images of false gods, who Unbelievers/Pagans were sacrificing their children to.
Jeremiah 7:30-34 - "For the sons of Judah have done evil in my sight, declares the Lord. They have set their detestable things in the house that is called by my name, to defile it. And they have built the high places of Topheth, which is in the Valley of the Son of Hinnom, to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire, which I did not command, nor did it come into my mind. Therefore, behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when it will no more be called Topheth, or the Valley of the Son of Hinnom, but the Valley of Slaughter; for they will bury in Topheth, because there is no room elsewhere. And the dead bodies of this people will be food for the birds of the air, and for the beasts of the earth, and none will frighten them away. And I will silence in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem the voice of mirth and the voice of gladness, the voice of the bridegroom and the voice of the bride, for the land shall become a waste."
4,"take their daughters for themselves"
Are you implying that this is rape? If so then you're biasedly or ignorantly assuming, as there's no mention of force, the word/term to take(marry) doesn't mean rape, simply means be with proven by Leviticus 18:18 where it says "Do not take your wife's sister as a rival wife and have sexual relations with her while your wife is living."
Even same word for take used(3947):
Leviticus 18:18 Lexicon: 'You shall not marry a woman in addition to her sister as a rival while she is alive, to uncover her nakedness.
Deuteronomy 21:11 Lexicon: and see among the captives a beautiful woman, and have a desire for her and would take her as a wife for yourself,
laqach -
Strong's Hebrew: 3947. ????? (laqach) -- to take
Nice try though.
No, Murder is killing Innocent. whereas for example stoning would be a painless(Stoning renders you Unconscious, such as surgery) method to get rid of anyone who harmed others, not towards innocent.
Whereas your worldview has it that Hitler would be right for Murdering Jews, just because he subjectively views it as right.
Wintery Knight is right - "I think its particularly important not to let atheists utter a word of moral judgment on any topic, since they cannot ground an objective standard that allows them to make statements of morality. Further, I think that they should have every immorality ever committed presented to them, and then they should be told your worldview does not allow you to condemn this as wrong. They cant praise anything as right, either. This is not to say that we should go all presuppositional on them, but if the opportunity arises to point out how they are borrowing from theism in order to attack it, we should do that in addition to presenting good scientific and historical evidence."
Simple, Matthew 7:12 - "In everything, therefore, Treat people the same way you would want them to treat you, for this Is the Law and the Prophets" and "Love thy neighbor as thyself" - Leviticus 19:18.
Moral derives for His nature, He is The Creator of All reality, everything known as a fact is from Him, Morals would therefore be no different than the objective existence of the earth.
That is not proof, People disagreeing does not change an Objective Fact nor does it prove anything Subjective.
People disagree on the shape of the earth, does that mean the earth is Subjective?
No. The Earth is Objectively Spherical. Differing views do not change an Objective. people do not have to agree or believe in the Objective for it to be true.
You're assuming Morality is Subjective and is determined by agreement, That is circular, "Morality is subjective because Morality is subjective", "Morality is based on views because people have views on Morals"
That was either very hard for you and you're lying or that was easy for you due to ignorant and lack of thinking before writing, you used Views of Morality as Proof that Morality is Subjective, that would be like me using views on the Earth to prove that the Shape of the Earth is Subjective.
That is absurd and you have yet to provide any evidence whatsoever for Morality being Subjective. By very definition of Objective, Not Based on Views, Opinion or Agreement, but a Fact. So no amount of Views, Opinions or Agreements will prove Morality is subjective.