Moral relativity doesn't work and isn't logical.
http://www.americanvision.org/article/caught-in-their-own-nets/
http://www.americanvision.org/article/caught-in-their-own-nets/
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If the write of the article does have some important things to say, he doesn't do it very well. The article itself is no more than hot air. It will appeal to those who like it's conclusion but persuade no-one because there is no substance to his argument.
Are you suggesting that people sometimes, when pushed to say something quickly and without thought before they speak, sometimes they say things that are a bit silly?
What's odd is that the writer had, seemingly, all the time in the world and couldn't write something less silly than that. Ironic, really.
I fail to see what is silly or ironic about it.
I also fail to see how someone, when pushed, would ever suggest that they simply would 'not necessarily like' their 13 year old having sex with a 45 year old man.
How is that ever acceptable?
I did say that there are important things to be said, but this article does not do a good job of saying them. Pulling out quotes, however dumb, does not a serious article make.It is a good example of moral relativism when a liberal is incapable of saying, resolutely, she would not like her 13 year old to be used as a sex object by a 45 year old...
And this is a modern person who was taught how to read in elementary school and watches TV, not a 9th century Nomadic herder on the Steppes.
Does that not strike you as odd?
Moral relativity doesn't work and isn't logical.
http://www.americanvision.org/article/caught-in-their-own-nets/![]()
nets are lies. when you take god out of an equation, you take out morality. when you take out morality, you take out truth. when you cant even see what the truth is, you work for the devil.
not everyone who goes to church is saved.
It is a good example of moral relativism when a liberal is incapable of saying, resolutely, she would not like her 13 year old to be used as a sex object by a 45 year old...
And this is a modern person who was taught how to read in elementary school and watches TV, not a 9th century Nomadic herder on the Steppes.
Does that not strike you as odd?
I fail to see what is silly or ironic about it.
I also fail to see how someone, when pushed, would ever suggest that they simply would 'not necessarily like' their 13 year old having sex with a 45 year old man.
How is that ever acceptable?
not everyone who goes to church is saved.
The supposed triumph of liberalism is non-existent. All the social, economic, legal and political victories of liberalism in the United States and abroad are only result of the cultural retreat of Christians. God catches His enemies in their own netslike He does with Whoopi, Obama, Clinton and many othersand thus He gives us assurance for our victory in history. If we will only act.
I would like to see the quote in context before leaping to the conclusion that Ms. Goldberg would ever like to think of her 13 yro daughter having sex with a 45 year old man.I dont necessarily want my 13-year old to have sex with a 45-year old man. What does that phrase mean? She probably wouldnt be able to tell. Does she say that it is not necessity that tells her what to want or not? Or does she say she is not forced to want her 13-year old to have sex, she just wants it on her own accord
nets are lies. when you take god out of an equation, you take out morality. when you take out morality, you take out truth. when you cant even see what the truth is, you work for the devil.
so i save a child from a bus. does my moral actions change if i believe in god or not? An action itself is ether moral or immoral. It has nothing to do with god. If god changes if a action is immoral or moral then morality is pointless and can change on gods whim.when you take god out of an equation, you take out morality.
Well an action is True if its moral or immoral Its simply the correct account of what happens. Truth: a circle is round. Lie a circle has for 4 sides and 4 right angles.when you take out morality, you take out truth.
The world is not that simple. I think what your really saying is that everyone that contradicts you and people who think like you are the enemy. You have just given it some divine spice.when you cant even see what the truth is, you work for the devil.