Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Can't CERN open Star Gate to hell?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ophiolite" data-source="post: 73703995" data-attributes="member: 234799"><p>In one sense it took around 2 1/2 minutes. In another sense it was just over seventy years.</p><p></p><p>I am aware that a very small number of physicists have expressed doubts about the safety of the intended experiments at CERN. The vast majority of experts are unconvinced by these doubts. Science is not a popularity contest, but experts, on both sides of the argument, are led by the evidence. The evidence appears to be saying "no meaningful risk".</p><p></p><p>I am unaware of any expert asserting that "something could come through" a "portal". Please provide relevant citations to support this assertion.</p><p></p><p>I am not aware that they have theories. They have assertions and they might have hypotheses. These are contradicted, say the majority of experts, by the evidence. </p><p></p><p>The Tower of Babel story is an important myth for historical and religious reasons. It's relevance to CERN is obscure. However, introducing a minority interpretation of Scripture to support an extreme viewpoint of the character of CERN is clear evidence that this thread discredits Christianity. Perhaps you are a fifth columnist intent on exactly that end. (See how easy it is to make silly assertions that lack support.)</p><p></p><p>It surely is! I have no truck with End Times nonsense. You are entitled to your beliefs. Just don't expect me to view them as relevant to an objective assessment of the character/purpose of CERN. (But do expect me view them as further evidence that this thread is an affront to faith.)</p><p></p><p>As above.</p><p></p><p>Science and Christianity are compatible. Rational thought and faith are compatible.</p><p></p><p>This does not mean that all forms of Christianity and faith are compatible with science and rational thought. </p><p></p><p>I stand by my earlier remarks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ophiolite, post: 73703995, member: 234799"] In one sense it took around 2 1/2 minutes. In another sense it was just over seventy years. I am aware that a very small number of physicists have expressed doubts about the safety of the intended experiments at CERN. The vast majority of experts are unconvinced by these doubts. Science is not a popularity contest, but experts, on both sides of the argument, are led by the evidence. The evidence appears to be saying "no meaningful risk". I am unaware of any expert asserting that "something could come through" a "portal". Please provide relevant citations to support this assertion. I am not aware that they have theories. They have assertions and they might have hypotheses. These are contradicted, say the majority of experts, by the evidence. The Tower of Babel story is an important myth for historical and religious reasons. It's relevance to CERN is obscure. However, introducing a minority interpretation of Scripture to support an extreme viewpoint of the character of CERN is clear evidence that this thread discredits Christianity. Perhaps you are a fifth columnist intent on exactly that end. (See how easy it is to make silly assertions that lack support.) It surely is! I have no truck with End Times nonsense. You are entitled to your beliefs. Just don't expect me to view them as relevant to an objective assessment of the character/purpose of CERN. (But do expect me view them as further evidence that this thread is an affront to faith.) As above. Science and Christianity are compatible. Rational thought and faith are compatible. This does not mean that all forms of Christianity and faith are compatible with science and rational thought. I stand by my earlier remarks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Can't CERN open Star Gate to hell?
Top
Bottom