• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Can we change our future?

peterrobin

Newbie
Jun 2, 2008
10
1
✟22,635.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
I don't know why everybody is going for the quantum red herring, a perfect prophesying machine might be theoretically possible from a technical point of view, if, say, time could be observed like a dimension.

But a perfect prophesying machine is impossible for the very reason you say.

Since a perfect prophesying machine would include the existence of itself in it's prediction, you would be looking at yourself being run over by a bus in full knowledge of what was about to happen!

If you looked at it in the morning and viewed your complete day then either you could do differently (in which case the machine would be wrong) or you would find yourself irresistibly following the pattern predicted even if you tried not to. In which case what caused those actions?
 
Upvote 0

stan1980

Veteran
Jan 7, 2008
3,238
261
✟27,040.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private

I sort of agree. I mean, freewill, from personal experience seems like a given, as I feel I'm in control of my actions and make my own choices. The problem is, I feel I'm not being consistent if I say "free will exists because I know it does", because that is exactly what I accuse and criticise the religious types of doing when they say the same thing about God. I hate being inconsistent.

Probably doesn't make much sense, but if I accept freewill exists which by instincts, if not logic, I do, then I have to accept there is a much bigger chance than I might give credit to that a deity exists.
 
Upvote 0

Eudaimonist

I believe in life before death!
Jan 1, 2003
27,482
2,738
58
American resident of Sweden
Visit site
✟126,756.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
Probably doesn't make much sense, but if I accept freewill exists which by instincts, if not logic, I do, then I have to accept there is a much bigger chance than I might give credit to that a deity exists.

It's not instinct. It's introspective observation. And it's not equivalent to saying that you know God exists through introspection, since you are still focusing on your own mind, and not trying to implicate the mind of some unknown entity. I don't think it is quite the epistemological disaster that you suggest.


eudaimonia,

Mark
 
Upvote 0

quatona

"God"? What do you mean??
May 15, 2005
37,512
4,302
✟182,802.00
Faith
Seeker
If you can the computer´s calculations were obviously wrong.
 
Upvote 0

UnafraidOne

Newbie
Jun 28, 2008
95
5
✟22,726.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single

But if the computer did predict the effect of its own prediction on you - and determinism is real - then the destiny it is showing you is the destiny wherein you had already seen that destiny - attempted to avoid it - and still it happened (or did nothing to avoid it - and it happened).
 
Reactions: quatona
Upvote 0