• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Can Theory of Probability be applied to Biology?

Shemjaza

Regular Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2006
6,474
4,012
47
✟1,118,529.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
AU-Greens
``In the beginning - God'' Genesis 1:1. Therefore all positive attitude: Trust, Authority, Love, Respect must be in original. Right from the start. One must earn not the Trust, but DisTrust.
I reject the initial definition, so it's unconvincing.

It's also incredibly circular as an argument.

1) You should accept that God is love
2) Because Thomas Aquinas said so
3) Because he's an authority
4) He's trustworthy because God is love
 
Reactions: tas8831
Upvote 0

VirOptimus

A nihilist who cares.
Aug 24, 2005
6,814
4,422
54
✟258,187.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
``In the beginning - God'' Genesis 1:1. Therefore all positive attitude: Trust, Authority, Love, Respect must be in original. Right from the start. One must earn not the Trust, but DisTrust.

If all you want is to preach then there are other parts of this site that welcome that. This subfora is for science.
 
Reactions: tas8831
Upvote 0

joinfree

Well-Known Member
Nov 3, 2016
1,009
191
88
EU
✟36,708.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I reject the initial definition, so it's unconvincing.

It's also incredibly circular as an argument.

1) You should accept that God is love
2) Because Thomas Aquinas said so
3) Because he's an authority
4) He's trustworthy because God is love
Friends, I soon will be banned for life because I have mentioned God on science subforum of Christianfirums.com. But you are welcome to answer in Personal Messages following:
A. Describe me the historic source of Atheism.
B. Describe me your personal source of personal Atheism.
 
Upvote 0

46AND2

Forty six and two are just ahead of me...
Sep 5, 2012
5,807
2,210
Vancouver, WA
✟109,603.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

Easy.

A. There isn't one. Been around since long before any historical record.
B. The lack of a faith source.
 
Reactions: tas8831
Upvote 0

tas8831

Well-Known Member
May 5, 2017
5,611
3,999
56
Northeast
✟101,040.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
A. Describe me the historic source of Atheism.
Intelligent people recognizing the failures of religion and the nonsense in their holy books.
B. Describe me your personal source of personal Atheism.
See above.
 
Upvote 0

tas8831

Well-Known Member
May 5, 2017
5,611
3,999
56
Northeast
✟101,040.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Statistical probability is not a guarantee.

If God were not in control of it all, for all I know atoms and molecules could produce a big coincidence of mutations so a woman gave birth to a kangeroo.

Statistical probability is not a guarantee, but apparently begging the question + strawmanning is a game winner.
 
Upvote 0