Here's the quote I am dealing with:
"In Roman Catholicism, Adam's transgression did result for him and his descendants in the loss of the superadded gift; and insofar as God has granted this gift to Adam and he therefore should have enjoyed it, the loss of it can be called culpable. But original sin is no more than this privation;it does not consist in the concupiscence that by itself is not sin, nor in an innate evil of the will, for though the will may have been weakened, it is neither lost nor corrupted. Thus fallen nature is actually totally identical with uncorrupted nature; true the supernatural gifts have been lost, but the natural gifts continue intact." Reformed Dogamtics: Sin and Salvation in Christ, Bavinick, 43.
First off, typing that was a beast because I kept making mistakes; most irritating. Secondly, what does he mean by the "superadded" gift? Does he mean perfect righteousness? In summary, and tell me if I have misread, he is saying that Roman Catholcism teaches that man's nature is not totally corrupted (total depravity) but is intact being able to choose between good and evil. Man's nature is now simply weakened and now simply leans toward concupiscence which is not a sin until those desires actually get acted out. is this correct? Finally, what are the natural gifts that are remaining intact?
"In Roman Catholicism, Adam's transgression did result for him and his descendants in the loss of the superadded gift; and insofar as God has granted this gift to Adam and he therefore should have enjoyed it, the loss of it can be called culpable. But original sin is no more than this privation;it does not consist in the concupiscence that by itself is not sin, nor in an innate evil of the will, for though the will may have been weakened, it is neither lost nor corrupted. Thus fallen nature is actually totally identical with uncorrupted nature; true the supernatural gifts have been lost, but the natural gifts continue intact." Reformed Dogamtics: Sin and Salvation in Christ, Bavinick, 43.
First off, typing that was a beast because I kept making mistakes; most irritating. Secondly, what does he mean by the "superadded" gift? Does he mean perfect righteousness? In summary, and tell me if I have misread, he is saying that Roman Catholcism teaches that man's nature is not totally corrupted (total depravity) but is intact being able to choose between good and evil. Man's nature is now simply weakened and now simply leans toward concupiscence which is not a sin until those desires actually get acted out. is this correct? Finally, what are the natural gifts that are remaining intact?