• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Can morality exist without God cont..

Dave Ellis

Contributor
Dec 27, 2011
8,933
821
Toronto, Ontario
✟59,815.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
CA-Conservatives



This is very similar to your previous post.

Citing the declaration of independence is a waste of time. It does not serve any sort of legal basis for the United States.

Likewise, relaying on the personal opinions of some founding fathers is also irrelevant. I don't dispute that people like John Adams were true believing Christians, however the country he took part in founding was not based on his religious beliefs. Many founding fathers were also very critical of Christianity, for example Thomas Jefferson. The country was founded secular, meaning religiously neutral. Everyone was free to worship whatever they wanted, however they wanted, or they could not worship anything at all if they so choose. That fact alone is in direct conflict with a Jewish or Christian basis for law.

The only relevant points you brought up in this post are ones that deal with the constitution... and in none of those quotes do I find anything that can be tied back to Judaism, Christianity or any other religion.
 
Upvote 0

(° ͡ ͜ ͡ʖ ͡ °) (ᵔᴥᵔʋ)

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 14, 2015
6,133
3,090
✟405,773.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Wow, I am honestly speechless. I do not know what to say. You do realize that I just quoted the founding fathers (the ones who wrote the constitution) saying that the purpose of the Constitution, Declaration of Independence, and the entire United States of America in general, was to ensure that our "God Given" rights under Divine Natural Law is protected?

I honestly can see why you are an atheist. I really don't want to come across as insulting but either you are willfully in a state of stubborn denial or your reading comprehension is woefully lacking. Althouth the comprehension theory would explain your inability to understand simple scripture, I prefer to assume that stubborn denial as a result of pride. Just deny...deny...deny...until you believe your view is true. Heck as long as you believe you are always right everything is swell. [emoji4]
 
Upvote 0

dougangel

Regular
Site Supporter
May 7, 2012
1,423
238
New Zealand
✟130,556.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

one set for Hebrew slaves (Lev 25:39-43) and a second set for foreign slaves (Lev 25:45-46)
Not sure what your point is.
To paraphrase.
Jesus said to Love.
Also to treat one another as you want to be treated this sums up the law and the prophets.
I don't know how anyone can read that and say slavery is all right with Christ.
Slavery isn't a Christian principle. End of story.
 
Upvote 0

Eudaimonist

I believe in life before death!
Jan 1, 2003
27,482
2,738
58
American resident of Sweden
Visit site
✟126,756.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian

 
Upvote 0

Dave Ellis

Contributor
Dec 27, 2011
8,933
821
Toronto, Ontario
✟59,815.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
CA-Conservatives

The only quotes you provided from the founding fathers was one from John Adams, and two from George Washington, one of which is not explicitly Christian.

Why not quote the man who actually drafted the constitution, Thomas Jefferson? He's on record as saying "Christianity is the most perverse system ever shone on man". He was also famous for taking a razor blade to the New Testament, cutting out virtually all references to the supernatural and the idea that Jesus was in any way divine, and left the remainder as essentially a philosophical work. He titled it "the life and morals of Jesus of Nazareth". The bible he cut up can still be viewed at the Smithsonian.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jefferson_Bible

However, to go back to your example of John Adams. The man was undoubtedly a Christian, I don't dispute that. However, he was also responsible for the Treaty of Tripoli. He was president during the time it was enacted, he was the person who submitted it to the senate, and as president, he signed it into law once the treaty was unanimously ratified. Article 11 of the treaty states "The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion".

Likewise, while Washington did speak positively of Christians during his public speeches, keep in mind he was also a politician. His private writings and diary portray him as a sort of a Christian/deist hybrid who only sporadically attended church. When speaking with Christian groups, he referenced God, when speaking with groups like the masonic lodge, he used the term "great architect of the universe". He also did not request a priest or minister at his deathbed either.

And to recap, many of the quotes you listed from the DOI or constitution aren't even backed up by the scripture you listed to support those points. I'm not even sure how you can use some of those as an argument.... Granted, I doubt you actually read all of those points. Yours was a simply copy/paste.
 
Upvote 0

(° ͡ ͜ ͡ʖ ͡ °) (ᵔᴥᵔʋ)

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 14, 2015
6,133
3,090
✟405,773.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Why not quote the man who actually drafted the constitution, Thomas Jefferson? .

You do realize that Thomas Jefferson did no write the constitution...right? It was James Madison. You obviously are rather ignorant on American history and are not qualified to debate this topic.
 
Upvote 0

Eudaimonist

I believe in life before death!
Jan 1, 2003
27,482
2,738
58
American resident of Sweden
Visit site
✟126,756.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Libertarian
You do realize that Thomas Jefferson did no write the constitution...right? It was James Madison. You obviously are rather ignorant on American history and are not qualified to debate this topic.

No one here is a Constitutional scholar. A slip on one fact isn't enough to disqualify anyone.


eudaimonia,

Mark
 
Upvote 0

(° ͡ ͜ ͡ʖ ͡ °) (ᵔᴥᵔʋ)

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 14, 2015
6,133
3,090
✟405,773.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
No one here is a Constitutional scholar. A slip on one fact isn't enough to disqualify anyone.


eudaimonia,

Mark
Probably like his claim that the United states based their laws on the ancient Romans. Probably got that information about Thomas Jefferson writing the Constitution from Wikipedia
 
Upvote 0

Dave Ellis

Contributor
Dec 27, 2011
8,933
821
Toronto, Ontario
✟59,815.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
CA-Conservatives
You do realize that Thomas Jefferson did no write the constitution...right? It was James Madison. You obviously are rather ignorant on American history and are not qualified to debate this topic.

My apologies, it was a typo. I meant to say drafted the Declaration of Independence.

Either way, barring my minor slip which was ultimately irrelevant to the post, my points still stand. I can provide you with plenty of other quotes from founding fathers which explicitly spell out that the country was not founded on any religion if you would like.

Now are you going to address my post?
 
Reactions: Eudaimonist
Upvote 0

Dave Ellis

Contributor
Dec 27, 2011
8,933
821
Toronto, Ontario
✟59,815.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Probably like his claim that the United states based their laws on the ancient Romans. Probably got that information about Thomas Jefferson writing the Constitution from Wikipedia

My points were backed with evidence.

You on the other hand were trying to argue that the Normans were Germans, and that Holy Roman Law served as the basis for English law, hundreds of years before there was a Holy Roman codified legal system.

Not that facts matter to you. It seems you feel entirely comfortable throwing out whatever you like, and ignoring any points raised against you.
 
Upvote 0

(° ͡ ͜ ͡ʖ ͡ °) (ᵔᴥᵔʋ)

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 14, 2015
6,133
3,090
✟405,773.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
From the wikipedia that you referenced:

It is understood by some historians that Jefferson composed it for his own satisfaction, supporting the Christian faith as he saw it. Gaustad states, "The retired President did not produce his small book to shock or offend a somnolent world; he composed it for himself, for his devotion, for his assurance, for a more restful sleep at nights and a more confident greeting of the mornings." [24]

There is no record of this or its successor being for "the Use of the Indians," despite the stated intent of the 1804 version being that purpose. Although the government long supported Christian activity among Indians,[25][26] and in Notes on the State of Virginia Jefferson supported "a perpetual mission among the Indian tribes," at least in the interest of anthropology,[27] and as President sanctioned financial support for a priest and church for the Kaskaskia Indians,[28] Jefferson did not make these works public. Instead, he acknowledged the existence of The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth to only a few friends, saying that he read it before retiring at night, as he found this project intensely personal and private.[29]

Ainsworth Rand Spofford, Librarian of Congress (1864 –1894) stated: "His original idea was to have the life and teachings of the Saviour, told in similar excerpts, prepared for the Indians, thinking this simple form would suit them best. But, abandoning this, the formal execution of his plan took the shape above described, which was for his individual use. He used the four languages that he might have the texts in them side by side, convenient for comparison. In the book he pasted a map of the ancient world and the Holy Land, with which he studied the New Testament." [30]

Some speculate that the reference to "Indians" in the 1804 title may have been an allusion to Jefferson's Federalist opponents, as he likewise used this indirect tactic against them at least once before, that being in his second inaugural address. Or that he was providing himself a cover story in case this work became public.[31]

Also referring to the 1804 version, Jefferson wrote, "A more beautiful or precious morsel of ethics I have never seen; it is a document in proof that I am a real Christian, that is to say, a disciple of the doctrines of Jesus."[30]

Jefferson's claim to be a Christian was made in response to those who accused him of being otherwise, due to his unorthodox view of the Bible and conception of Christ. Recognizing his rather unusual views, Jefferson stated in a letter (1819) to Ezra Stiles Ely, "You say you are a Calvinist. I am not. I am of a sect by myself, as far as I know."[32]
 
Upvote 0

(° ͡ ͜ ͡ʖ ͡ °) (ᵔᴥᵔʋ)

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 14, 2015
6,133
3,090
✟405,773.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
My points were backed with evidence.
What evidence? You have not shown any evidence to support your claim that us laws are based on the ancient Roman Laws. My claim was based on Britannica.com.

You on the other hand were trying to argue that the Normans were Germans, and that Holy Roman Law served as the basis for English law, hundreds of years before there was a Holy Roman codified legal system.

I never said the laws came from the Normans. I said the laws originated from "Germanic Northern Europe" as a result of the Norman Conquest. I do believe that the US Justice "system" and the US "system of government" (a republic) was emulated from the Roman Republic. However, the laws themselves did not come from the Romans. I provided numerous examples that prove that the purpose of the Constitution, Declaration of Independence, and the founding of the US in general was to protect our "God given" rights given to mankind through "Divine Natural Law".

Not that facts matter to you. It seems you feel entirely comfortable throwing out whatever you like, and ignoring any points raised against you.

Thats rich. Lol
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

(° ͡ ͜ ͡ʖ ͡ °) (ᵔᴥᵔʋ)

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 14, 2015
6,133
3,090
✟405,773.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
OK...let's talk about the constitution and the man who drafted it. Undoubtedly, the constitution was written in a manner to remain secular in order to protect religious freedoms. James Madison was a huge supporter of the separation of church and state in order to protect the immigrants (Puritans, Catholics, Anabaptists, Quakers, Jews, ect...) from the persecution led them the the US in the first place.

"The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the ceaseless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe in blood for centuries."

"We hold it for a fundamental and undeniable truth "that religion, or the duty which we owe our Creator, and the manner of discharging it, can be directed only by reason and conviction, not by force or violence." The religion, then, of every man must be left to the conviction and conscience of every man: and that it is the right of every man to exercise it as these may dictate."


However, it was the religious belief in "Divine Natural Law" that motivated the existence of the US and the Constitution. Let's look at some quotes from James Madison, the man who drafted the constitution.

"Religion [is] the basis and Foundation of Government."

"We have staked the whole future of American civilization, not upon the power of government, far from it. We have staked the future of all of our political institutions upon the capacity of mankind for self-government; upon the capacity of each and all of us to govern ourselves, to control ourselves, to sustain ourselves according to the Ten Commandments of God."

In 1788, Madison stated:
"The belief in God all powerful wise and good, is so essential to the moral order of the world and to the happiness of man, that arguments which enforce it cannot be drawn from too many sources nor adapted with too much solicitude to the different characters and capacities to be impressed with it."

 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Dave Ellis

Contributor
Dec 27, 2011
8,933
821
Toronto, Ontario
✟59,815.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
CA-Conservatives

Yes, I know... I read the article. There's no point in copy/pasting something that I'm already aware of.

What's your point?
 
Upvote 0

Dave Ellis

Contributor
Dec 27, 2011
8,933
821
Toronto, Ontario
✟59,815.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
CA-Conservatives
What evidence? You have not shown any evidence to support your claim that us laws are based on the ancient Roman Laws. My claim was based on Britannica.com.

Read this thread. Not only I, but Eudaimonist also provided evidence.

Furthermore, I also explained why your article does not apply.


And why exactly would the Normans bring German law, when they themselves were not German, nor were they descended from Germans?

To simplify, my original post dealt with Roman law.

You responded with "You mean Holy Roman Law". My answer was no, because a unified and codified Holy Roman legal system was not established for half a millennium after the Norman conquest.
 
Upvote 0

Dave Ellis

Contributor
Dec 27, 2011
8,933
821
Toronto, Ontario
✟59,815.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
CA-Conservatives


So in short, you agree with my point.

Various founding fathers were religious, some were not. They had many different views. Recognizing the value of freedom of religion they adopted that into the constitution, and established a secular state.

The problem is, that's completely antithetical to the ancient Jewish legal system, which was essentially a theocracy govererned by god's laws. That's the exact type of thing the founding fathers sought to AVOID when writing the constitution.
 
Upvote 0

(° ͡ ͜ ͡ʖ ͡ °) (ᵔᴥᵔʋ)

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 14, 2015
6,133
3,090
✟405,773.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married

This was not your point. Your point was that American laws were based on ancient Roman Laws. I just provided numerous cases to prove that Divine natural law is at the heart of everything America stood for.
 
Upvote 0

(° ͡ ͜ ͡ʖ ͡ °) (ᵔᴥᵔʋ)

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 14, 2015
6,133
3,090
✟405,773.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Yes, I know... I read the article. There's no point in copy/pasting something that I'm already aware of.

What's your point?
The point was that although Jefferson's beliefs were not orthodox, he undoubtedly regarded himself as a Christian who adopted John Locke's principles of Divine Natural Law and applied it to the Declaration of Independence and the foundation of the United States of America.
 
Upvote 0

Dave Ellis

Contributor
Dec 27, 2011
8,933
821
Toronto, Ontario
✟59,815.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
CA-Conservatives
This was not your point. Your point was that American laws were based on ancient Roman Laws. I just provided numerous cases to prove that Divine natural law is at the heart of everything America stood for.

Do you not see the inherent contradiction between divine law, and freedom of religion?

The constitution is written specifically to exclude divine law. It is an explicitly secular document.
 
Upvote 0