Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Can evolutionists handle the truth
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="caravelair" data-source="post: 23867475" data-attributes="member: 30011"><p>they assert this fact, but refuse to test it. that's why it's not science. </p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>no it doesn't, because science requires testing. by refusing to acknowledge evidence that contradicts their predetermined conlcusions, they are refusing to test their ideas, and thus refusing to do science. so no, this approach does not allow them to examine anything scientifically. all it allows them to do is offer pseudoscience to people that are not well informed enough to know the difference. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>scientists do not use any axioms that would prevent them from conlcuding things like a young earth or a global flood. in fact, the people who originally falsified these things were christian geologists who were looking to determine which layers were deposited by the flood, and discovered to their surprise that none of them could have been. the only thing preventing scientists from concluding YEC is that this is contrary to what the evidence indicates if examined objectively. it is only if you assume YEC that you can conclude YEC.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="caravelair, post: 23867475, member: 30011"] they assert this fact, but refuse to test it. that's why it's not science. no it doesn't, because science requires testing. by refusing to acknowledge evidence that contradicts their predetermined conlcusions, they are refusing to test their ideas, and thus refusing to do science. so no, this approach does not allow them to examine anything scientifically. all it allows them to do is offer pseudoscience to people that are not well informed enough to know the difference. scientists do not use any axioms that would prevent them from conlcuding things like a young earth or a global flood. in fact, the people who originally falsified these things were christian geologists who were looking to determine which layers were deposited by the flood, and discovered to their surprise that none of them could have been. the only thing preventing scientists from concluding YEC is that this is contrary to what the evidence indicates if examined objectively. it is only if you assume YEC that you can conclude YEC. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Can evolutionists handle the truth
Top
Bottom