Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Can evolutionists handle the truth
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="chaoschristian" data-source="post: 23865604" data-attributes="member: 134885"><p>There is no reason to assume that the YEC version of origins is correct, because the evidence provided by Creation itself precludes that possibility.</p><p> </p><p>However, IF it is correct, then you are correct in stating that we cannot come to an understanding, not only of the Creator, but of Creation itself. Because if the YEC model is correct, then all of Creation is deceitful and God turns out to be rather capricious.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>And this, right here, is the claim of the neo-creationist. Totally unfounded and unsupported by either scripture itself or any orthodox traditional surrounding scripture, it is nevertheless asserted as <em>apriori</em> truth. </p><p> </p><p>It puts the YEC-model on untenable theological grounds within the context of orthodox Christianity, because not only does it deny the revelation of Creation as a reliable witness to God's truth, it also denies Christ himself of the supreme revelation of God.</p><p> </p><p>Deny Creation, subvert Christ. That is the YEC theological model.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="chaoschristian, post: 23865604, member: 134885"] There is no reason to assume that the YEC version of origins is correct, because the evidence provided by Creation itself precludes that possibility. However, IF it is correct, then you are correct in stating that we cannot come to an understanding, not only of the Creator, but of Creation itself. Because if the YEC model is correct, then all of Creation is deceitful and God turns out to be rather capricious. And this, right here, is the claim of the neo-creationist. Totally unfounded and unsupported by either scripture itself or any orthodox traditional surrounding scripture, it is nevertheless asserted as [I]apriori[/I] truth. It puts the YEC-model on untenable theological grounds within the context of orthodox Christianity, because not only does it deny the revelation of Creation as a reliable witness to God's truth, it also denies Christ himself of the supreme revelation of God. Deny Creation, subvert Christ. That is the YEC theological model. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Can evolutionists handle the truth
Top
Bottom