• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Can anyone explain how the moth got it's owl eyes?

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,786
52,554
Guam
✟5,135,581.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
thanks, I do not know who Fanny Crosby is but will have a look.

cheers!

In my "Taking Questions on Embedded Age" thread, someone once posted this to me:

2+2<>10
Two plus two, it is not ten.
It is not ten, no matter when.
It is not ten, not here or there.
It is not ten, not anywhere.

"It might be ten. Yes, it could be.
If God, this world, didn't oversee.
Maybe on an alien tree."

It would not, could not, in a tree.
"On Krypton?" No, you let me be.

It is not ten, not in a box.
It is not ten, not with a fox.
It is not ten, not in a house.
It is not ten, not with a mouse.
It is not ten, not here or there.
It is not ten, not anywhere.
I do not need to state again.
It is not ten. It is not ten.
--doubtingmerle


To which I replied:

Two plus two indeed are ten.
Unless you're confused as to exactly when.
For two plus two are ten and no more.
If you're adding two plus two in the base of four.


That's about the extent of my poetry skills.
 
Upvote 0

Astrid

Well-Known Member
Feb 10, 2021
11,052
3,695
40
Hong Kong
✟188,686.00
Country
Hong Kong
Gender
Female
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
In Relationship
You are pretty good at resisting calls to
recognize how absurd your claims are.
 
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,786
52,554
Guam
✟5,135,581.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You are pretty good at resisting calls to recognize how absurd your claims are.

And just what are those claims that are being resisted?

If you recognize them, perhaps you could tell us?
 
Upvote 0

Thurston-howell-III

Active Member
Mar 20, 2024
178
22
62
FL
✟13,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Can you show some copying errors that advanced "evolution" ?
I've got tons that are killing machines.
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,174
7,494
31
Wales
✟427,140.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Can you show some copying errors that advanced "evolution" ?
I've got tons that are killing machines.
Lactose tolerance, ability to ingest gluten, higher bone density, resistance to malaria in certain populations in Africa, resistance to HIV in certain European populations, ability to move cholesterol inside the human body to the liver meaning lower risk of heart disease.

Those are ones I found looking up 'positive mutations' on Google.
 
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

Thurston-howell-III

Active Member
Mar 20, 2024
178
22
62
FL
✟13,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
And what was the cost to the organism ?
When hemoglobin molecules get mutated, it causes sickle cell anemia, would you volunteer to have this mutation?
 
Upvote 0

Astrid

Well-Known Member
Feb 10, 2021
11,052
3,695
40
Hong Kong
✟188,686.00
Country
Hong Kong
Gender
Female
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Can you show some copying errors that advanced "evolution" ?
I've got tons that are killing machines.
Would it suit you to have "bible", "your faith"
etc in quotation marks?
Or would you recognize it as belittling
editorializing?

But to answer your q., the error that gives sickle cell
anemia is one.

Another made house flies immune to ddt.

You do know that most educated Christians have
no problem understanding evolution?
That the " denier" churches draw their membership
from " the trailer park", the lowest rungs of the
socioeconomic ladder?

That to disprove a theory you need contrary facts,
not quotation marks and questions?

Curious if you know / will admit the above is true.
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,174
7,494
31
Wales
✟427,140.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
And what was the cost to the organism ?
When hemoglobin molecules get mutated, it causes sickle cell anemia, would you volunteer to have this mutation?

Your comment makes no sense. The organism was getting a positive beneficial mutation, thus allowing the organism to live, thrive and produce offspring. That's all there is to it. It's not a cost related thing in the slightest.

And you can't 'volunteer' to get a mutation. Mutations occur. Mutations are the reason your hair colour is what it is, your eyes are the colour they are, whether you have wisdom teeth or not.
 
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

Astrid

Well-Known Member
Feb 10, 2021
11,052
3,695
40
Hong Kong
✟188,686.00
Country
Hong Kong
Gender
Female
Faith
Skeptic
Marital Status
In Relationship
And what was the cost to the organism ?
When hemoglobin molecules get mutated, it causes sickle cell anemia, would you volunteer to have this mutation?
You dont understand the relationship to malaria?
 
Upvote 0

The IbanezerScrooge

I can't believe what I'm hearing...
Sep 1, 2015
3,458
5,853
51
Florida
✟310,373.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
How did they "acquire" them?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,786
52,554
Guam
✟5,135,581.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Lactose tolerance,

Would you explain this further please?

Why are you considering lactose tolerance a benefit of evolution?

It looks to me like you're saying that, if it wasn't for evolution, we would all be lactose intolerant.

Perhaps we started out tolerant, then became intolerant due to the Fall?
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,786
52,554
Guam
✟5,135,581.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You do know that most educated Christians have no problem understanding evolution?

... or Phlogiston theory, or geocentrism, or witchcraft, or O rings, or crime rates, or AGW, or impending ice ages, or Y2K, or D&D, or chess, or checkers, or Parchisi, or the stock market, or ...

What's your point?

That the "denier" churches draw their membership from "the trailer park", the lowest rungs of the socioeconomic ladder?

Where did Jesus draw His membership?

You know.

Those twelve men who were considered scumbags by the elites?

That to disprove a theory you need contrary facts, not quotation marks and questions?

Then don't disprove it.

Just say the Bible says it is wrong and be done with it.

A child should be able to tell a scientist he is wrong.

Curious if you know / will admit the above is true.

I hope so.

We have trailer parks around here that should make good mission fields.

On the intel scale, who is harder to lead to Christ?

Rebecca Watson or your maid?
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,174
7,494
31
Wales
✟427,140.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Would you explain this further please?

Why are you considering lactose tolerance a benefit of evolution?

It looks to me like you're saying that, if it wasn't for evolution, we would all be lactose intolerant.

I'm going to ignore the last bit since it's your basic fallacy you always play with regards to anything scientific but the rest is interesting.

Yes, lactose tolerance is benefit. Because if you try and have anything with lactose when you can't, the results are nasty, but historically, they would have been much worse. People would die from diarrhoea caused by their lactose intolerance since there was no historical way to recoup the lost water and nutrients lost from it. Plus projectile vomiting, cramps, etc. You get the picture of how bad that could be, and historically, this would be a killer.

How is the tolerance to lactose then not a benefit of evolution?
 
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,786
52,554
Guam
✟5,135,581.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,786
52,554
Guam
✟5,135,581.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Yes, lactose tolerance is benefit. Because if you try and have anything with lactose when you can't, the results are nasty,

Yes ... and if I try to have peanuts, when I can't, the results are nasty.

I don't understand.

Are you saying that, historically, the default position is that most everyone was born intolerant, until evolution rescued them?

If so, that's bologna.

And I know you don't believe in him like I do, but it's an excellent question:

Were Adam & Eve created lactose intolerant?

And isn't the Promised Land called "the land of milk and honey"?

No one in the Bible drank milk and survived?

Is that what you want me to believe?

How is the tolerance to lactose then not a benefit of evolution?

Only on paper.

I submit lactose intolerance is the exception, not the rule.

And anyone using lactose tolerance as a brownie point for evolution has been brainwashed by academia.
 
Upvote 0

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
9,238
10,136
✟284,594.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
You claimed you had made your last post on this thread. Despite that I asked if you might take the time to anwer my questions from post #93. I asked this, and repeated the question, in post #103 . Now, for your convenience I repeat them again here and ask that you please repsond.

1. Which field of science are you expert in? I'm not asking for your speciality, e.g. carbonatite lavas of East Africa; or, generalities, e.g. geologist; but something in the middle, e.g. vulcanologist.
2. Since you know evolution is not possible how did you go about falsifying it?

Thank you for your attention.
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,174
7,494
31
Wales
✟427,140.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
I submit lactose intolerance is the exception, not the rule.

This is the only bit I'm going to focus on since the rest of your post is just your regular BS:

68% of the world is lactose intolerant. I'll leave it at that.
 
Upvote 0

Thurston-howell-III

Active Member
Mar 20, 2024
178
22
62
FL
✟13,596.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
it makes perfect sense, would you trade sickle cell anemia for malaria resistance? Because that's what happens.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,786
52,554
Guam
✟5,135,581.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0