• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Call It A Tale of Two Cities, 2003 Edition

cenimo

Jesus Had A 12 Man A-Team
Mar 17, 2002
2,000
78
To your right
Visit site
✟25,182.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
WND:police watch as 9-11 memorial trashed [font="verdana, arial, helvetica"]target=_blank>http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/a...RTICLE_ID=31473[/font]

Police watch as 9-11 memorial trashed
War protesters' burning of U.S. flags, patriotic signs called 'free speech'

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: March 11, 2003
5:00 p.m. Eastern



© 2003 WorldNetDaily.com

Police in a Los Angeles suburb allowed anti-war protesters to trash a patriotic 9-11 memorial, citing the vandals' "freedom of speech."

The protesters burned and ripped up U.S. flags, flowers and patriotic signs erected on a fence along a boulevard in La Habra, Calif. The display had been maintained since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, said the local Whittier Daily News.


Tracey Chandler of Whittier displays American flag that had been burned and slashed by vandals (Photo: Bernardo Alps, Whittier Daily News).

Officers witnessed the vandalism Saturday afternoon but did not arrest three people seen damaging the memorial because they were "exercising the same freedom of speech that the people who put up the flags were," said La Habra Police Capt. John Rees.

"For this to be vandalism, there had to be an ill-will intent,' he said, according to the Whittier paper.

Police would take action only if the owner filed a complaint, said Rees.

Owner Jeff Collision said he might press charges.

"Their free speech stops at destruction of private property," said Collision, who runs The RV Center of La Habra. "If they are allowed to come on my property and burn flags, does that mean I can go to City Hall or the police station and light their flags on fire because that is freedom of speech? To me, this is vandalism."

A local resident who helped maintain the spontaneous memorial said she was shocked by the destruction.

"They trashed 87 flags, ripped 11 memorial tiles made by myself and my children out of the ground and glued the Bob Dylan song to a sign that said, 'America, land of the brave, home of the free,'" said Tracey Chandler, a mother of four, referring to Dylan's "With God on Our Side," an anti-war anthem of the 1960s.

"It's unbelievable, because there were absolutely no political messages on this fence," said Chandler, according to the Daily News. "It was all about supporting our troops, which could mean bringing them home, and about remembering 9-11."

The paper quoted Les Howard, a sociology professor at Whittier College, who said he did not condone the destruction but believed the incident might reflect confusion among people trying to prevent a war against Iraq who are uncertain about how to express their sentiments.

"Some think [the best way to support the troops] is to not question their role," Howard said. "Some think the best way is to pursue all means possible to avoid putting them in danger. That still does not excuse any desecration of people's symbolic participation."

Chandler said she is going to help rebuild the memorial, promising "it will be brighter, bigger and better than ever."


<!-- BEGIN TEMPLATE: postbit_signature -->[font="verdana, arial, helvetica"]__________________
[/font]

[font="verdana, arial, helvetica"][/font]&nbsp;

[font="verdana, arial, helvetica"]ABC News: Oklahoma Town Rallies to Support Troops[/font]

[font="verdana, arial, helvetica"]
<BLOCKQUOTE>[font=verdana,arial,helvetica]quote:[/font]
<HR>
target=_blank>ABC News
[/font]

CUSTER CITY, Okla. March 12 —
Residents dug out their Fourth of July clothes and covered the town with red, white and blue. The mother of a soldier in Kuwait belted out "God Bless America" as American flags waved in the breeze.

Several hundred people in this small western Oklahoma town gathered Tuesday on Main Street for a rally in support of troops heading toward a possible war in Iraq.

"This isn't about whether we should be in the Middle East or whether we shouldn't," said Vicki Fergason, who was pinning yellow ribbons on people's coats. "It's about coming together to support our service people and their families. They are under so much stress."

Flags stuck out of the red dirt lining the curvy road into Custer City, named after the Seventh Cavalry general who slaughtered a Cheyenne village just down the road. Residents tied yellow ribbons on nearly every fence post, tree and street sign in town. Yellow daffodils sprouted from almost every pot.

"For or against the war, we're here for our guys," said Betty Hoffman, who has lived in Custer County all of her 76 years.
 

Morat

Untitled One
Jun 6, 2002
2,725
4
50
Visit site
✟27,690.00
Faith
Atheist
Yeah, I saw that a few days ago. A few things struck me as odd:

1) There was no picture of the vandalism. Just a picture of a ripped flag. Why not?
2) The actions of the police officers. They don't square with law, the general viewpoint of police officers, or anything. That bit about only taking action of the "owner complains". That's BS. Police will arrest someone spraying graffitti. They don't stand around watching, waiting for the building owner to come complain...
3) There is absolutely no corroboration of it. No stories anywhere else.

An interesting note: The officer's statements about free speech would have been correct, both legally and from the training cops get, if the flags "ripped and burned" had been brought by the protesters.

My take? It's going into the "Urban Legend" bin until some more information is forthcoming.
 
Upvote 0