Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Ok, recently I have read in a thread somewhere that the burden of proof on the topic of deities is apparently on atheists! Can someone please explain to me how this is the case?
I started a thread on a slightly similar note:
http://www.christianforums.com/t7554035/
In this thread, I reject the claim that cows exist and demand that the cowists (who believe cows exist) provide proof of the existence of these strange creatures. Until then, I'm an acowist.
Now, as to burden of proof: is the burden of proof on the cowists, since they're making the positive claim, or on the acowists, since they're doubting/going against generally accepted knowledge?
Ok, recently I have read in a thread somewhere that the burden of proof on the topic of deities is apparently on atheists! Can someone please explain to me how this is the case?
I have no doubt that this would have been brought up before, but I would like an up to date thread on it.
It is still on the people with the cows. The problem with this is that it is not practical. 99.9999% of all people have seen a cow and the ones who haven't have seen pictures of them and/or have heard people talk about them.
I know what you are saying, and of course it is ok for the cowist to ask the acowist why he doesn't believe in cows (like in religion) and if the acowist says there is no evidence for it, the cowist would show the evidence and if the acowist still resists, there is nothing more you can do.
I think you sum it up nicely. There is ample "proof" out there that God exists; it's just that you don't accept our "proof" as your "proof".
I probably can do more to try to prove that God exists, but it's quite difficult to do over a computer screen...
I don't think I will accept this as true until you prove it."
I don't envy christians, they tend to get divorced more often, end up in jail more often. Also in America they tend to have lower education than atheists.
For all practical purposes God does exist until you prove otherwise.=begt;57398824]"It does if you claim non exitence is a fact." I don't claim absolute certainty, but for all practical purposes god doesn't exist until proven otherwise.
We can look for the teapot, but looking for the reason we exist is a little bit more difficult to find or to even find it is not there. Also the existence of a teapot is not relevant to our lives, but a reason or lack of reason for our existence is relevant."Claiming we exist for a reason is not the same as claiming a giant teapot is in orbit."
What's the difference?
If no one is claiming they can prove something, then no one has any burden of proof." Good, then neither of us claim anything can be proven and neither of us has any burden of proof." ehh, what?
If there is no Creator, who is the one to whom our existence matters, after the human species becomes extinct?"Your assumption that an assumption that we exist for a reason has no evidence of rational thinking behind it, is an incorrect assumption. " Of course we exist for a reason. But that reason is most likely not god.
I'm sorry, I don't know if you misunderstood me, but I certainly do not believe there is ample proof anywhere for any god's existence.
I don't think I will accept this as true until you prove it.
For all practical purposes God does exist until you prove otherwise.
We can look for the teapot, but looking for the reason we exist is a little bit more difficult to find or to even find it is not there. Also the existence of a teapot is not relevant to our lives, but a reason or lack of reason for our existence is relevant.
If no one is claiming they can prove something, then no one has any burden of proof.
If there is no Creator, who is the one to whom our existence matters, after the human species becomes extinct?
Did you read the cowist thread? Do you realize you're perfectly proving the posters point?
You won't believe in God regardless of any evidence presented because the evidence presented isn't "real" evidence to you.
I love how every single atheist alive uses the word 'prove' or that it has to be solved by 'science'.
We do not have to prove what we feel. Just like we don't ask you to go out and prove that you love your wife or girlfriend. Does it make us wrong that there isn't a physical God in front of me today? Science is not the end all, be all. Scientists have been wrong more times than right throughout the history of man ... half the theories tossed around have very little facts supporting them. But, since the people that developed them were 'smart' they must be true! Humanity being created by a primortial ooze or whatever it is? Every thing on earth being created from a single celled organism? Mmk. Prove it?
You can find proof of a God in every day experiences and stories you hear everywhere -- but -- you'll choose to ignore it because, scientifically, it doesn't make sense.
- The life of Jesus Christ. Even non-believers wrote about a man named Jesus who walked the Earth and did miracles. Atheists, Jews, etc have written about this man. But, we'll just question his existence because it's easier.
- Tons of people have had near death experiences or 'seen the light' and written about it and talked about it, but -- it cannot be explained. So, it must be a hallucination - because, well, there is no God. Can't be! Yes people from other religions encounter these same things ... they claim they saw God. Their God. How do we know we're not all seeing the same God? Just because our religion may have been changed throughout history does not mean that God doesn't exist ... he wouldn't abandon a loving person because they have been misguided in religion. Doesn't surprise me people from all religions see a 'light' or 'God'.
Every one of them must be hallucinating though.
- I've seen stories of an entire churches burning down, but -- the only thing that makes it out is the bible, unscathed. Pure coincidence surely. God chooses when to make his grace known, he doesn't owe us anything -- that's the point of FAITH. It's about believing in something even though it cannot be proven. That's the definition. Amazing, huh?
- I just read a story recently of a kid that was almost deemed dead. He saw 'God'. This God introduced him to his brother(I believe it was). He didn't have a brother ... except that his mother had miscarried years before he was even born - it was a boy and she never talked to her son about it. How did he know this all of a sudden? Publicity stunt! Has to be!
"Why? Why does it need evidence? To satisfy your mind? Just because you deny it's existence does not mean it's not there. If you were to encounter or see an apparition -- you'd believe, no? But why? If there's no evidence outside of what you've seen and experienced - it shouldn't exist, correct? Than what did you see/experience?"
To determine whether or not it was real. That's why evidence is needed. I'm not denying anything for the sake of denying if that's what you believe. Sometimes I wish there was a god but it makes no sense to me.
It's really about what lifestyle you want to live. Should you demand evidence of people who come up with amazing claims of ghosts/gods or whatever, or should you just accept it? If no evidence is demanded what would life be like? Oh the devil stole my money so I can't pay my bills so therefor I don't have to pay anything... All sorts of silly claims would have to be accepted. Science would not work if all claims are accepted...
If I were to encounter what seems to be an apparition I'd be emotionally affected by the experience (needless to say I don't think it will happen). But if there was no other rational explaination that I or anyone else could come up with afterwards, then I'd draw the conclusion that it was an apparition.
Every-single-theory ever created can be countered with reasons why it simply doesn't work. Big Bang, Evolution, etc - the list goes on. It's theory for a reason - not fact.
The gospels? There are questions about the translations or the exact quotes of Jesus, but -- there's been little to dispute that they were first hand accounts.
When world historian H. G. Wells was asked who has left the greatest legacy on history, he replied, By this test Jesus stands first. ... We talk about Jesus still today, for a reason. Most historical figures, especially back then are best remembered by word of mouth and 'future' writings anyway.
I have already addressed this question. But, I will again. How do we know the Jewish God is different than the Christian God? I'm more inclined to think it's our religion(led by man) that is telling us what God to pray to when in reality, they could very well be the same person. Also -- going back to the point ... why would an atheist be hoping or expecting a vision from God on their death bed? As for your other question(why doesn't God show himself to everyone) ... why does he have to? He expects all of us to believe, that's why he put Jesus here. On that same point, it's very close minded to immediately disregard it as drugs/morphine(when a lot of the times they aren't even on drugs and a lot of them are atheists).
Because God gave us free will and lets the world operate on it's own. Natural disasters or man made fires are not God condemning anything. It's the world happening and unfortunately, people will die. That's why you need God because you never know when your time comes.
It was an article on CNN.com. They didn't make money off of it. However, if they did decide to write a book or what not, that does not mean it's a stunt. Lots of religious people share these types of experiences and that doesn't mean they are all 'stunts'. That would be a very negative point of view.
The bible and scriptures warn us that there will be people trying to use 'science' or other factors we cannot describe as a basis to deny his existence and people still doubt. I understand there's things that are hard to answer or that have 'holes' in them. Well, so does every other theory in the history of man -- except for gravity.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?