Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I just visited the local SGI center in order to see what they are really all about.
Perhaps I'm missing something, but what does SGI stand for? I'm not familiar with the acronym.
eudaimonia,
Mark
Soka Gakkai International. They are often regarded as a cult, or at least a controversial sect, even by practicing Buddhists
Why do you (seemingly) reject Theravada then, if you have little knowledge of it, if I may ask?I must be honest that my knowledge of Buddhism is mostly limited to Pure Land Buddhism, which happens to be the most commonly practiced form of Mahayana Buddhism in the East.
I thought they were more focused on the pursuit of world peace. I presented a paper once at a conference they held in Canada.
Why do you (seemingly) reject Theravada then, if you have little knowledge of it, if I may ask?
http://www.sacbc.org/index.php/teachings/minister-s-message/310-gutoku-shinranI have admired Shinran Shonin precisely because he recognized that to be able to truly and deeply come to trust in Amida’s Vow one must admit to the reality of one’s True Self. His writings abound with statements on how important it is to see the true "evil"-nature of one's self. ["Evil" had a more specific, slightly different, meaning to Shinran in this context] This self-condemnation was not just an exercise in humility, but represents an essential step in the process for weakening the illusion of power held by the ego-self. Without this deep, almost shame filled admission one cannot deeply realize that dependence on self, ego, self-power, will fail to help us in achieving enlightenment. And if one does not seek enlightenment one is destined to return again and again into the world of birth-and-death.To be Buddhist is to seek enlightenment, or release from this world of birth-and-death. Shinran and Honen proclaimed that the “old” or “traditional” practices of achieving enlightenment, namely the Path of Sages, were now out of reach for most people, even the current monks of his day, because they “lack clear insight into the teaching and are ignorant of the distinction between true and provisional.” This was not just a judgment about the other monks, but an admission about his own ability, too. Thus, for Shinran, the name “Gutoku” expressed his ultimate realization about his True Self.
I believe that this realization must be firmly acknowledged BEFORE one can even attempt to practice the qualities of a bodhisattva, namely, compassion, or even true gratitude. Without this realization, people who seek to practice as bodhisattvas prematurely will find it so difficult, if not impossible, to always be “kind and gentle to every living being.” Until we acknowledge our True Self, we practice from a false center, an inauthentic center, and thus our 'practice' fails.
Although we rely upon Amida Buddha for our 'Birth' or enlightenment, this realization of our True Self is something that each of us must do for ourselves. It is not for anyone else to tell us that we are ignorant, or unaware or unenlightened. That’s why the most important thing to remember is that we should pay attention to our own minds first. Getting caught up in criticizing others does not benefit one’s spiritual development, it actually distracts us, as we become consumed with the belief that we know what is ‘right’ and ‘wrong’ for ourselves and others. Shinran firmly rejected such thinking.
I know nothing at all of good or evil. For if I could know thoroughly, as Amida Tathagata knows, that an act was good, then I would know good. If I could know thoroughly, as the Tathagata knows, that an act was evil, then I would know evil. But with a foolish being full of blind passions, in this fleeting world—this burning house—all matters without exception are empty and false, totally without truth and sincerity. The nembutsu alone is true and real.
— from A Record in Lament of Divergences, Postscript, The Collected Works of Shinran, Vol. I. Jodo Shinshu Hongwanji-ha, Kyoto. 1997.
Shinran chose his name ‘Gutoku’ not to set himself below others around him, but to remind himself that because he recognized the raw naked truth about his ego-self, he could rely absolutely, without a doubt, without hesitation, upon the Nembutsu and Vow of the Amida Buddha. He had seen through and thoroughly given up trust and reliance and all pride on any belief of his own personal power, his own ego-self. When the 'self' is seen this way, regardless of what dharma practice one may follow, this is ultimately the way one achieves liberation from this world of birth-and-death. Why? Because it is the 'self' that creates a false illusion of duality and that is the first step in the creation of Ignorance - the root of all Dukkha.
The path of Jodo Shinshu nembutsu dissolves the rigid discriminatory nature created by the ego-self, not by meditation or even by philosophical deconstruction, but by realizing that the self we are so attached to is an empty illusion lacking true reality in the presence of the Amida Buddha, the Vow, and the Nembutsu. namoamidabutsu.
http://www.sacbc.org/index.php/teachings/minister-s-message/310-gutoku-shinran
Interesting; thanks for your explanation.Shinran Shonin is famous for explaining the contradiction in relying solely on your own efforts, as Theravada Buddhists do, in a religion which claims to be about overcoming or abandoning your ego-self. Shin Buddhism is the largest sect of Buddhism in Japan. Shinran taught salvation by grace through faith, three hundred years before Martin Luther, by trusting in the immeasurable compassion of Amida Buddha...
Interesting; thanks for your explanation.
I see the self as abandoned by the fulfillment of self, as Ven. Ananda similarly described how desire is abandoned by the fulfillment of desire, in the Brahmana Sutta of the Samyutta Nikaya 51.15.
Do you find any difficulties reconciling the earliest suttas (Pali Nikayas) with subsequent Pure Land sutras?
Thanks for sharing!According to traditional Mahayana teachings, the Mahayana sutras were taught later in the teaching career of Buddha than the Pali sutras, and therefore represent a more mature or complete form of his teaching. Shinran based his teachings on the three Pure Land sutras.
Then I'd like to know the thinking or basis for the statement.What if I told you that the universe has always existed in some form, so there's no need for a Creator,
That one appears to repeatedly fail against observations, unless one is allowed to invoke reincarnation and karma to make things come out right.and that there's a natural law of cause and effect, so there's no need for a Judge who rewards and punishes?
Again, I'd want to know about the thinking behind the statement before I could begin to weigh it.What if I then told you that, instead of a God as we understand the term, there is a compassionate essence to the universe that is within each and every human being, and It is our true nature waiting to be born?
Buddhism is so varied it is difficult to keep it properly under one simple term.Buddhists pray to and take refuge in various Buddhas and Bodhisattvas, but they are understood to be awakened human beings, and that, by taking refuge in them, we will also be led to our own awakening.
It's a common misconception that all Buddhists are atheists, which seems to be perpetuated by Western secularists who insist on projecting their understanding of Buddhism onto all Buddhists and by Theravada Buddhists who insist that their way is the only legitimate way to live the Dharma.
If you called a Mahayana Buddhist who's taken a Bodhisattva Vow, believes the Dalai Lama to be the 14th incarnation of Avalokiteśvara, and who prays to Amitabha, the Buddha of Infinite Light and Life, an atheist, would that really make sense in the way someone like Richard Dawkins would use the term?
I don't think anyone knows absolutely, which is why it is still being worked on. We have the Big Bang theory, which has done remarkably well, surviving a quarter century of scientific attack while it was the minority position in cosmology. That gives us the universe as we know it, but there's still some knowing to do, to put it mildly away from our familiar human-scale "common-sense" frame of reference. Before the Big Bang? "Nothing" remains a possibility, unless I'm well out-of-date, but hypotheses and observations ar being attempted, trying to establish if there was a "before", and if so something of the nature of such. Even if budded off, or one of myriads in a foam of universes, once in existence our universe is our *universe*. Nothing outside it, or influencing it.Chris B, asan atheist, what do you believe about the origin of th# uiverse? .
As for pray, let's look at the original meaning of the term:
1
:entreat, implore —often used as a function word in introducing a question, request, or plea <pray be careful>
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pray
Roman Catholics pray to saints, but they are very clear that they are not worshiped as gods.
this is a good article on what buddhists believe and why:
http://www.tricycle.com/blog/10-misconceptions-about-buddhism
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?