When did the teaching of one need to be born again before believe start or first was taught?
Did Calvin teach this?
Did Calvin teach this?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
John taught it.When did the teaching of one need to be born again before believe start or first was taught?
Did Calvin teach this?
John taught it.
1 John 5:1
Recognize that all true Christians will be Calvinists in glory....
Your friendly neighborhood Cordial Calvinist
Woody.
Logically, yes, Regeneration/ the new birth/ born again, preceeds and causes faith/ trust & believing.Correct me if I am wrong Woody, but isn't this seen most of all in the doctrine of regeneration? Regeneration by the Holy Spirit preceeds faith and believing, according to John 16:8?
I know this was a foundational truth believed by the oldest Baptist association in America.
God Bless
Till all are one.
Logically, yes, Regeneration/ the new birth/ born again, preceeds and causes faith/ trust & believing.
When Adam was created, the Holy Spirit breathed into him the breath of life and he did what was natural; opened his eyes and believed in his Creator. When the Holy Spirit hovers over a spiritually dead soul and gives him a new birth, we do what is natural; we open our spiritually dead eyes and believe in our Redeemer.
I was blind; now I see.
I'm not sure just how you can seperate in time the new birth and believing, just as Adam's new life and the action of the Holy Spirit to give it were inseperable events. Still one logically preceeded the other and caused it.
1 John 5:1 is absurdly clear in the Greek: Whosoever believes (now) has already been born of God (in an action already considered completed and not needing to be redone - if I remember my tenses from memory). This scripture is true for the first moment of belief and for all moments of belief. At my first moment of belief, I was already born of God. In the sense that the board must open to permit the bullet to pass through, no one will deny that it is the irresistible power of the bullet which causes the hole through which it passes. From my perspective as the board, I allowed the bullet (Holy Spirit) to pass through. From the perspective of the bullet, the power is irresistible.
Edit: Woody marks post #5300.
Recognize that all true Christians will be Calvinists in glory....
Your friendly neighborhood Cordial Calvinist
Woody.
Regeneration is spiritual life, but it alone is no more salvation than the ability to understand is an education. With regeneration we can see the Kingdom of God; with salvation we're brought into the Kingdom of God. One is necessary to the other; but they aren't identical.I'm a Calvinist, but I'm having a bit of a hard time fully understanding the regeneration preceeding faith. It seems that this doctrine teaches that believing doesn't save us, but rather we believe because we are saved. Is that correct? If so, what do we make of passages that say that faith saves us? Am I misunderstanding something?
Well, no, that isn't what 1 John 5:1 says. It says you are already born again (perfect tense), and that if you are believing (present tense) in Jesus. Greek's pretty straightforward. You don't become born by believing, according to this verse. You have been born if you are believing, according to this verse.John 5:1 says if you keep believing then you are born again.
1 John 5:1 is quite a statement. "Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ has been born of God, and everyone who loves the Father loves whoever has been born of him."I haven't seen one verse that proove this doctorine.
Yes, spiritual regeneration is not receiving the Holy Spirit of God. Spiritual birth is not the same as the indwelling of the Spirit of God. One involves something done to us. The other involves a relationship made between us and God.How do you explain Act 2:38 Then Peter said to them, “Repent, and let every one of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins; and you shall receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.
Recieving the H.S is after believe.
Augustine held to this view. So did Thomas Aquinas. Now, this question is specifically touching on the logical precedence of spiritual regeneration, and not extending into other questions of human cooperation over what follows, where as we've said we disagree with the Roman Catholic view. But on that specific point there's more agreement than may first appear.My question was did anyone after the disciples believed this? or was it lost doctorine till Calvin?
I'm a Calvinist, but I'm having a bit of a hard time fully understanding the regeneration preceeding faith. It seems that this doctrine teaches that believing doesn't save us, but rather we believe because we are saved. Is that correct? If so, what do we make of passages that say that faith saves us? Am I misunderstanding something?
Augustine didn't believe being born again happens before believe.Regeneration is spiritual life, but it alone is no more salvation than the ability to understand is an education. With regeneration we can see the Kingdom of God; with salvation we're brought into the Kingdom of God. One is necessary to the other; but they aren't identical.
Faith is the sole instrument by which we are saved; but again, it's not God looking, "Oh, he's got such a fine faith. I'll let him into My Kingdom."
Well, no, that isn't what 1 John 5:1 says. It says you are already born again (perfect tense), and that if you are believing (present tense) in Jesus. Greek's pretty straightforward. You don't become born by believing, according to this verse. You have been born if you are believing, according to this verse.
1 John 5:1 is quite a statement. "Everyone who believes that Jesus is the Christ has been born of God, and everyone who loves the Father loves whoever has been born of him."
Again, we're talking about precedence, here: that faith can only be built on a spiritual foundation, it can't be built on a carnal one. So regeneration must precede faith. "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God." Jn 3:3
Yes, spiritual regeneration is not receiving the Holy Spirit of God. Spiritual birth is not the same as the indwelling of the Spirit of God. One involves something done to us. The other involves a relationship made between us and God.
Augustine held to this view. So did Thomas Aquinas. Now, this question is specifically touching on the logical precedence of spiritual regeneration, and not extending into other questions of human cooperation over what follows, where as we've said we disagree with the Roman Catholic view. But on that specific point there's more agreement than may first appear.
Even Chrysostom points out something remarkably close to this (Homily 4 on Ephesians, Ch. 2: 3ff):One dead, by nature a child of wrath. And what good hast thou done? None. Truly now it is high time to exclaim, “Oh the depth of the riches both of the wisdom and the knowledge of God!” (Rom 11:33) v. 8 “For by grace,” saith he “have ye been saved."
In order then that the greatness of the benefits bestowed may not raise thee too high, observe how he brings thee down: “by grace ye have been saved,” saith he,
“Through faith;”
Then, that, on the other hand, our free-will be not impaired, he adds also our part in the work, and yet again cancels it, and adds,
“And that not of ourselves.”
Neither is faith, he means, “of ourselves.” Because had He not come, had He not called us, how had we been able to believe? for “how,” saith he, “shall they believe, unless they hear?” (Rom. 10:14.) So that the work of faith itself is not our own.
“It is the gift,” said he, “of God,” it is “not of works.”
Was faith then, you will say, enough to save us? No; but God, saith he, hath required this, lest He should save us, barren and without work at all. His expression is, that faith saveth, but it is because God so willeth, that faith saveth. Since, how, tell me, doth faith save, without works? This itself is the gift of God.
Ver. 9. “That no man should glory.”
That he may excite in us proper feeling touching this gift of grace.
Augustine didn't believe being born again happens before believe.
"It is this one Spirit who makes it possible for an infant to be regenerated . . . when that infant is brought to baptism; and it is through this one Spirit that the infant so presented is reborn. For it is not written, Unless a man be born again by the will of his parents or by the faith of those presenting him or ministering to him, but, Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit. The water, therefore, manifesting exteriorly the sacrament of grace, and the Spirit effecting interiorly the benefit of grace, both regenerate in one Christ that man who was generated in Adam" (Letters 98:2 [A.D. 412]).
"Those who, though they have not received the washing of regeneration, die for the confession of Christit avails them just as much for the forgiveness of their sins as if they had been washed in the sacred font of baptism. For he that said, If anyone is not reborn of water and the Spirit, he will not enter the kingdom of heaven, made an exception for them in that other statement in which he says no less generally, Whoever confesses me before men, I too will confess him before my Father, who is in heaven" [Matt. 10:32] (The City of God 13:7 [A.D. 419]).
Chrysostom didn't say anything I would disagree with.
The quote. He is not saying God gives faith irresistably
"Neither is faith, he means, of ourselves. Because had He not come, had He not called us, how had we been able to believe? "
It's because God calls us we have faith. This doesn't mean everyone he calls they will respond.
Born again is being born of the Spirit or born of above.
act 2:38 is saying repent and be baptized tghen you will recieve the H.S(or be born again).
Bill
God gives the heart to do the comandments but sometimes we choose to disobey him.
BillGood Day, Orth
Indeed... those who he loves he chasens.
The point is with out God giving the heart, we can not do them.
In Him,
Bill
Bill
I don't see that as unless you are born again you can't believe. I see it as unless God send someone to preach you can't come to him.
God changes one heart when they repent.
You see these people humbled themself and came to Jerusalem without God changing their heart.
Which quote assures my assertion, orthedoxy. Augustine taught the baptism of infants, and believed the Spirit regenerates through that baptism. He said nothing of infants believing before their baptism.Augustine didn't believe being born again happens before believe.
"It is this one Spirit who makes it possible for an infant to be regenerated . . . when that infant is brought to baptism; and it is through this one Spirit that the infant so presented is reborn. For it is not written, ‘Unless a man be born again by the will of his parents’ or ‘by the faith of those presenting him or ministering to him,’ but, ‘Unless a man be born again of water and the Holy Spirit.’ The water, therefore, manifesting exteriorly the sacrament of grace, and the Spirit effecting interiorly the benefit of grace, both regenerate in one Christ that man who was generated in Adam" (Letters 98:2 [A.D. 412]).
Augustine considered martyrs to have received baptism through their martyrdom."Those who, though they have not received the washing of regeneration, die for the confession of Christ—it avails them just as much for the forgiveness of their sins as if they had been washed in the sacred font of baptism. For he that said, ‘If anyone is not reborn of water and the Spirit, he will not enter the kingdom of heaven,’ made an exception for them in that other statement in which he says no less generally, ‘Whoever confesses me before men, I too will confess him before my Father, who is in heaven’" [Matt. 10:32] (The City of God 13:7 [A.D. 419]).
So? The question is one of precedence, not of finding something you would disagree with.Chrysostom didn't say anything I would disagree with.
Which is beside the focus of your question. As I said, if you focus on the question you asked, the answer is quite clear. If you focus on myriad other points of disagreement, that's just being argumentative.The quote. He is not saying God gives faith irresistably
"Neither is faith, he means, “of ourselves.” Because had He not come, had He not called us, how had we been able to believe? "
It's because God calls us we have faith. This doesn't mean everyone he calls they will respond.
"Being born" is not "receiving". You're saying they're the same. I'm saying they're not.Born again is being born of the Spirit or born of above.
act 2:38 is saying repent and be baptized tghen you will recieve the H.S(or be born again).