I'm putting this in the courting couples forum because I'm sure many of y'all have thought about wedding rings at one time or another...and if you haven't well you will after this
I saw the Nicholas Cage movie Lord of War that got me thinking about this....
I'm sure most of you know about blood diamonds/conflict diamonds that come from African mines ...if you don't here's a briefing on it:
I'm sure most of you know about the diamond monopoly - Debeers - you buy a diamond basically its gonna come from them. Anyway, some people try to solve the problem of not buying blood diamonds because who wants to support that or think about it everytime you look at your ring? One way is to buy Canadian diamonds....BUT there is evidence that many "canadian diamonds" are actually blood diamonds smuggled out of Africa, where the illegal diamond trade is buying guns for terroirsts.(Yeah, like in the new Nicholas Cage movie) Look here: http://temagami.carleton.ca/jmc/cnews/15022002/feature.shtml
Anyway, the point of this thread is to ask....what alternatives are there? I can think of only a few:
1. Get a wedding ring without a stone.
2. Get a wedding ring with a stone other than diamond (ruby, sapphire, etc)
3. Get an imitation diamond (mossanite, cubic zirconia, Asha)
4. Tattoo a ring onto your hand. haha
And I can't think of anything else to solve this moral dilema? What do you guys think about this? Is it morally wrong to purchase a stone that there is a 1 in 10 chance or greater that it is a blood diamond and supports terrorists?
I'm sure most of you know about blood diamonds/conflict diamonds that come from African mines ...if you don't here's a briefing on it:
"Conflict diamonds are not just a public-relations problem. About one in every ten gem diamonds is smuggled from four African nationsLiberia, Sierra Leone, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Angolathat feed money to a large black market. Some of the profits go to criminal gangs, some to brutal ruling regimes, some to outright terrorists. And the stones are mined under oppressive conditions for the smallest of wages, using methods that damage the countryside
Part of the problem is human and part is geological.
The human part is the diamond market, an ancient secretive business where dealers trade stones back and forth, combine lots from different sources, and sell them across many borders during their trip to the jeweler.
American law demands certification only from the last country to export the stone. It has never been very important to know where a stone comes fromonce cut and polished, a perfect diamond sheds its history. And no one in the business is interested in changing things any more than they have to."
I'm sure most of you know about the diamond monopoly - Debeers - you buy a diamond basically its gonna come from them. Anyway, some people try to solve the problem of not buying blood diamonds because who wants to support that or think about it everytime you look at your ring? One way is to buy Canadian diamonds....BUT there is evidence that many "canadian diamonds" are actually blood diamonds smuggled out of Africa, where the illegal diamond trade is buying guns for terroirsts.(Yeah, like in the new Nicholas Cage movie) Look here: http://temagami.carleton.ca/jmc/cnews/15022002/feature.shtml
Anyway, the point of this thread is to ask....what alternatives are there? I can think of only a few:
1. Get a wedding ring without a stone.
2. Get a wedding ring with a stone other than diamond (ruby, sapphire, etc)
3. Get an imitation diamond (mossanite, cubic zirconia, Asha)
4. Tattoo a ring onto your hand. haha
And I can't think of anything else to solve this moral dilema? What do you guys think about this? Is it morally wrong to purchase a stone that there is a 1 in 10 chance or greater that it is a blood diamond and supports terrorists?