I have read far, far too many Dean Koontz novels to think this sort of stuff is a good idea.
Already, he said, they have learned things they "never would have learned had there been a bioethical ban."
Yeah, and Joseph Mengele learned things he never would have learned if he hadn't been experimenting on inmates at Auschwitz. That doesn't mean we should emulate him, however.
Now Weissman says he is thinking about making chimeric mice whose brains are 100 percent human. He proposes keeping tabs on the mice as they develop. If the brains look as if they are taking on a distinctly human architecture a development that could hint at a glimmer of humanness they could be killed, he said.
But
what if they get loose? If they have a human brain, then they could be as smart as any other human. They could
figure out ways to outwit the august Dr. Weissman. And if they escaped, then what? They breed and produce more smart mice, who band together and act in concert; they can go places we can't; they can hide places we can't; and we all know how effective rodent control is with
regular mice---how about
smart ones?
This is not a good idea, folks. Physics was the hot science in 1900, and the result was Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and the hydrogen bomb. Now it's biology. The prospects scare the hell out of me.
"Everyone said the mice would be useful," he said. "But no one was sure if it should be done."
And as Ian Malcolm said in
Jurassic Park, "You got so excited about the fact that you
could do it, you never bothered to ask yourselves if you
should do it."
The scientists, of course, haughtily sniffed at his concerns.
Right before they were eaten by the carniverous dinosaurs.