- Jul 23, 2004
- 69
- 3
- 42
- Faith
- Anglican
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Democrat
In between Conferences, bishops govern the UMC. It appears that most other Wesleyan/Methodist denominations are not episcopal. Is government by bishops a good thing?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Willimon is one of my favorite writers. I will find it interesting to see how he approaches the job, since he has not been in a traditional pastoral setting for so long--I will be watching to see what happens with great interest!Try said:On the dubject of Good Bishops, the inimitable William B. Oden just retired. However Will Willimon has recieved a very well deserved promotion.
My UM History professor is somewhat of an expert on Wesley. He described the letter that Wesley sent to Asbury after Asbury adopted said title as beginning something to the effect of: "Frankie, what have you done?"Polycarp1 said:The Bishops of the UMC were originally intended by Wesley to be referred to as General Superintendents (much like the Nazarenes have at present). IIRC, Francis Asbury adopted the title of Bishop, since the job of the General Superintendent is the oversight (episkopé) of the connectional church as Paul specifies is the work of a bishop. I think it's probably important for Catholics, Orthodox, and Anglicans reading this thread to recognize that Methodist Bishops are not a "superior order of ministry," but elders (presbyterioi, otherwise known as presbyters or priests) named to the duty of oversight of the church. (That little differentiation threw me for a loop when I was first reading up on church history as a Methodist.)