• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Bill Nye the Science Guy and Creationism

Status
Not open for further replies.

joshua 1 9

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 11, 2015
17,420
3,593
Northern Ohio
✟314,607.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Both young and old earth creationists reject universal common ancestry and evolution which Nye also addressed. Did you miss that part?
Old Earth Creationism was developed to be compatible with science. There is no conflict. It was designed to maintain harmony between what is taught in science class and what the students are taught in their religion class. I only have a two year level of education in Christian Education but I have been to Bible school and I took four teacher training classes when I was there. I am qualified to be a sunday school superintendent in most any church. Of course two years of Bible college is not much but it is a lot more then what a lot of the people out in the churches have that are working with the kids. There are a lot of churches out there where the pastor only has two years worth of Bible college. That is enough to preach a sermon but not enough to really be a Spiritual guide for people.
 
Upvote 0

Murby

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2016
1,077
641
65
USA
✟4,630.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Doctors are the third leading cause of death in this country. So you better be careful not to trust Science in the way you seem to advocate.
I can't figure out if you're really that stupid or if you're actually intelligent enough to twist the facts to fit your own point of view.. I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and go with the 2nd option. (and you know what I'm talking about)

Anyone that can get themselves to the hospital does not need to be there.
Starting to doubt that you intentionally twisted the facts.. That was a bad statement.

Doctors push a lot of medicine when according to Dr Ornish and others: diet, exercise and behavior modification would be a much better option with a much less chance of remission.
First you attack the doctors and then use a doctor to postulate a point? Really?

Oh.. and by the way.. its been proven that Ornish's ideas don't hold water. You might want to do some research before you hold someone up on a pedestal like that.

I'm not going to bother quoting the rest of your post because its basically half-truths mixed in with fertilizer. But here are the scientific facts, and them I'm going to back them up with my own empirical evidence and experience.

Some child obesity research doctor out of UCLA (San Fransisco branch?) attached some radioactive tags to some sugar molecules and followed them through the metabolic process, and discovered why everyone is fat. What he found is that sugar is the cause of almost all cardiovascular disease.. but not just any sugar.. specifically a sugar called Fructose which is found in all fruits, and table sugars and added sugars (50% glucose / 50% fructose).
Every organ and every cell in your body can burn glucose for energy.. glucose is required for life. But there's only one organ in your body that can metabolize fructose which is the Liver, and the Liver can only metabolize it into one thing called LDL Cholesterol (the bad kind of cholesterol)..
Now, the scientific findings were pretty straight forward.. our modern technological tools are what enabled him to perform these experiments as these resources were not available in the past.
The evidence is not just empirical, he also carries corroborating statistical information dating back past the early 1900's to back it up. Charts showing statistical obesity rates vs. the amount of sugar consumed for the time period.

And, since I am an middle aged fat guy with a cholesterol problem, I followed his advice and dropped my bad cholesterol by 30% in 6 months even though I didn't actually lose any weight.

The problem is sugar.. its everywhere.. in our ketchup, breads, cereals, mayonnaise, spices, processed meats, etc etc.. I was stunned at how hard it is to buy food without added sugars. Ever noticed that sugar is not found anywhere in nature except fruits once per year?

The next logical argument.. "Well fruits have fructose so this research says fruits are bad for you too?" The answer is both a yes and a no but I'll give you the short explanation.
Fruit juice is horribly bad for you, even if its 100% squeezed from the fruit because the fiber is taken out and its the high fiber content of the fruit that stops the body from absorbing much of the fructose. Also, during human evolution, we only ate fruits at the end of summers when they ripened on the trees.. after that, no fruits until the next year.
Its actually more in depth than that but that's the easy version.
So should you eat fruits? Absolutely.. Eat the whole fruit.. It was determined that the amount of fiber in the fruit greatly diminishes the detrimental affects of the fructose that makes them taste so good.

The fact is that any diet that causes you to lose weight is also going to have some positive health effects.. and a lot of people attribute those positive effects to the wacky Dr.Someone diet plan when the actual diet had nothing to do with it.

If you're going to dispute someones post, you should dispute it with cold hard facts.. twisting the facts or using terminology to hide the true meaning of those facts is not honorable. Specifically, doctors are not the leading cause of death, hospital errors caused by human mistakes are.

Do you know what the latest field of study is??? Can you guess? Its about eliminating those hospital mistakes! There are entire research articles devoted to this stuff.

I can never decide who I enjoy debating with more.. Complete idiots, or people intelligent enough to twist factual information... The idiots are more entertaining.. the intelligent people require more work... Its rare when I find someone who is actually smart enough and honorable enough to hold their opposing side without distortion or fallacies.

I'm not calling you dishonorable, I'm just saying you need to resist the urge to twist things. Dr. Ornish was a good try.. reasonable enough, sounded like solid advice on the surface.. No twisting there.. but proved false by other research.
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,322
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,572.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Old Earth Creationism was developed to be compatible with science. There is no conflict. It was designed to maintain harmony between what is taught in science class and what the students are taught in their religion class.

Does Old Earth Creationism teach universal common ancestry, or does it reject it?
 
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

joshua 1 9

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 11, 2015
17,420
3,593
Northern Ohio
✟314,607.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I can't figure out if you're really that stupid or if you're actually intelligent enough to twist the facts to fit your own point of view..
My IQ has been measured around 142 for whatever that means. I think there are some people on here that their IQ runs around 160.

First you attack the doctors and then use a doctor to postulate a point? Really?
Yes, everyone makes that same point. The reason we know when doctors are idiots is because science exposes them. We know there is a lot of bad science when we compare it to the good science. Which leads people to believe that science is neither good or evil. It can be used for good and science can be used for evil. We can save lives or we can destroy lives. A knife in the hand of a doctor can save a life or a knife can be used to destroy a persons life. This is always the way the discussion goes.

Oh.. and by the way.. its been proven that Ornish's ideas don't hold water.
If that were true then the insurance companys would not be paying for his program. Even Medicate pays people to go through the Ornish program because it saves them money. Even one of the presidents asked Ornish to work with the chef at the white house to be sure that he was getting a diet with healthy food.

I'm not going to bother quoting the rest of your post because its basically half-truths mixed in with fertilizer. But here are the scientific facts, and them I'm going to back them up with my own empirical evidence and experience.
So you are going to argue against my "half truths" with your half truths. It looks like you have not learned yet that you can only judge yourself and your guilty of what you judge others of. In science this is called projecting. They give credit to Fraud for the theory but it was really his daughter Anna that developed it. Plus what the Bible says about as you judged you shall be judged.

Do Not Judge
1"Do not judge so that you will not be judged. 2"For in the way you judge, you will be judged; and by your standard of measure, it will be measured to you.3"Why do you look at the speck that is in your brother's eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye?… mat 7
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

joshua 1 9

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 11, 2015
17,420
3,593
Northern Ohio
✟314,607.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Does Old Earth Creationism teach universal common ancestry, or does it reject it?
Yes of course Creationism teaches common ancestry. That is why science uses the term Mitochondrial Eve when they talk about the matriarch of all of the human race. That is why they use the Creationist name of Adam. Even Eden is a term that environmental evolutionists use, esp when talking about bio-diverse ecosystems in Africa. The Adam and Eve in the Bible shows us how God does what He does. We are told by Moses: "I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children, on the third and the fourth generations of those who hate Me, 6but showing lovingkindness to thousands, to those who love Me and keep My commandments." Exo 20
 
Upvote 0

Murby

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2016
1,077
641
65
USA
✟4,630.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married

I would agree with a lot of what you just said.. but to clarify, good and evil are about intentions, not the tools. Science is a tool and nothing more.
 
Upvote 0

KWCrazy

Newbie
Apr 13, 2009
7,229
1,993
Bowling Green, KY
✟98,077.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
This is remarkable. First, you acknowledge that the supernatural can't be observed and in the next breath you say there are encounters with the supernatural.

I said it's not scientifically provable.
have supernatural encounters been recorded? Absolutely. Can they be positively identified as supernatural? No. No contradiction whatever.
The problem is that it is impossible to tell the difference between an encounter with the supernatural (whatever that is) and simply being mistaken or even hallucination.
In many cases, that is absolutely correct.
The fact of the matter is that those who say they had an encounter with the supernatural, are
merely claiming it.

That's a baseless and unfounded allegation based on what YOU believe. Many who have had such encounters don't know what to believe and would like to find a reasonable explanation.
A mere claim, that can't be supported as you acknowledge, does not automatically translate to truth.
True; just as it is true that the claim we live in a purely physical world does not automatically translate to being truth.
I don't see how "logic" suggests that. Why can't a god trigger a big bang and then let it all unfold without manifesting inside that space-time continuum?
What would be the point of creating a world and then having nothing whatever to do with it? If there is a God, then He could create a world as easily as an author could pen the words, Let there be light. A being capable of creating the universe could do so in any many He chose. Why would he tell his creation a falsehood when a trillion year creation is no less a miracle than a 6 day creation? Impossible = impossible.
No, we don't. What we have are
claims that we have that. Claims that can't be supported or demonstrated. Claims that can't be differentiated from mistakes or hallucinations.

In the original covenant, man was required to make sacrifices to God. Why? Because life was a struggle and to take the best he had and simply eliminate it meant that his faith had to mean a great deal to him. Encounters between God and man were more direct. God physically spoke to His prophets, and their authority on earth was absolute. Christ showed himself to Saul of Tarsas and proved Himself to His disciples, but message of Jesus Christ was the forgiveness of sins by faith alone. Faith is the acceptance of things unproven. Unbelievers scoff and are confident in their disbelief. Believers are humble with their knowledge that God is real.
 
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,322
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,572.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single

Universal common ancestry... do you know what that means?
 
Upvote 0

Papias

Listening to TW4
Dec 22, 2005
3,967
988
59
✟64,806.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married


Like I said he said essentially that. I could look up the video he said it in but I'll just get annoyed hearing him say it again. He sounded so mad when he said it too.

No, he didn't. You've been asked to back up your claim,and you can't. It sounds like you made that up yourself so as to attack Nye for your own reasons. In fact, the link here, from a Christian source, said this about what Nye said over the whole debate:

Nye worked hard to not disparage religion in general, and said there were billions of religious people who don’t accept young earth creationism. http://www.catholic.com/blog/trent-horn/the-great-creationevolution-debate
Now, do you want to back that up? Or admit that Nye never said that Christians were weak minded, stupid people who have the brains of apes and believe in an idiotic concept ? I think this goes back to the 8th/9th commandment.

In Christ-

Papias
 
Reactions: Ada Lovelace
Upvote 0

NothingIsImpossible

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
5,618
3,253
✟289,942.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Thankfully I am not one of these people that cares about backing up claims when I know what I seen. I always say instead of expecting proof, why not look it up yourself? If I recall it was a video on youtube about evolution, big bang...etc. Also on a side note that link is from Feb 2014. He said this later in 2014/early 2015.
 
Upvote 0

Papias

Listening to TW4
Dec 22, 2005
3,967
988
59
✟64,806.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Most everyone is OEC.

Simply and demonstrably false. I showed the data that had so few old earth creationists (those who accept an old earth but reject evolution) as so tiny as to not even show up. Here it is again:




They want to hijack the dictionary and people need to be made aware of what they are doing and the disservice they are doing to science.

No, it's you who has a problem with the dictionary. As I pointed out, "creationism" is "evolution denial. Here it is, right from the dictionary:

creationism [kree-ey-shuh-niz-uh m]
noun
1.
the doctrine that matter and all things were created, substantially as they now exist, by an omnipotent Creator, and not gradually evolved or developed.​

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/creationism?s=t

Like I said Evolutionism is Creationism so Bill Nye is pretty much presenting an argument against himself and science.

Wow, you are really making no sense at all. Evolutionism is Creationism? Down is up?

Look, if you want to learn what OEC is, there are actually a few OEC around, though they are rare. Here's probably their biggest website. http://www.reasons.org/

In Christ-

Papias
 
Upvote 0

PsychoSarah

Chaotic Neutral
Jan 13, 2014
20,522
2,609
✟102,963.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
-_- I am an agnostic atheist. Agnostic is not a faith statement, but a knowledge statement often confused with a faith label. Also, more than half the atheists on here have, at some point, argued that science itself is not inherently atheistic, so don't assume we spread that misconception. Agnostic means "to not know". I don't claim to have seen or know of evidence that disproves the existence of deities. However, due to a lack of evidence to support their existence, I don't believe that they exist. I could be wrong, but nevertheless, that is what I think. Without evidence, I have no reason to think that deities exist.

Science not only can live without religion, but it has been hindered by it for centuries.
 
Upvote 0

Papias

Listening to TW4
Dec 22, 2005
3,967
988
59
✟64,806.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married

You do understand that in a rational discussion, the burden of proof is on the person making the claim right?

In Christ-
Papias
 
Reactions: Ada Lovelace
Upvote 0

Butterfly99

Getting ready for spring break. Cya!
Oct 28, 2015
1,099
1,392
26
DC area
✟30,792.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single

Well isn't Ken Ham a young earth creationist? He believes the universe is less than 10,000 yrs old & man & dinos lived alongside each other, right? Bill Nye was debating Ken Ham. That happened 2 yrs ago. Ham made himself look like a complete tool. Most Christians know that man is in it for money & he doesn't speak for the rest of us.
 
Upvote 0

Murby

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2016
1,077
641
65
USA
✟4,630.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
You do understand that in a rational discussion, the burden of proof is on the person making the claim right?
Most deeply religious people I have had experience with do not understand that. Their empirical evidence or proof comes from a book and that's good enough for them.
 
Upvote 0

joshua 1 9

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 11, 2015
17,420
3,593
Northern Ohio
✟314,607.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Bill Nye did a very nice job in that debate. Like you I was not very impressed with Ken Ham.
 
Reactions: Butterfly99
Upvote 0

joshua 1 9

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 11, 2015
17,420
3,593
Northern Ohio
✟314,607.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I can understand that because of the way I was raised. My father was a doctor and he had a LOT of faith in science and what they could accomplish. Back then they had seen a lot of death and destruction from WW2 and people were really tired of it. There was a lot of childhood disease and they worked hard to come up with vaccines to prevent those diseases. My father was a very good doctor and he saved a lot of lives. Only for me I had problems that science could not solve and questions that science could not answer. So I looked and looked and looked for solutions and answers. Finally someone said to try God, read the Bible, pray and ask the Holy Spirit of God to show me the meaning of the Bible. I started to understand and I found that it all worked for me. Of course there is a lot more to my story then just this, but I do not want to bore people with it. Still I grew up in a good family, we were a pillar of the community. My grandfather had been mayor so we were well established. I should have been very happy and content. But there was something missing in my life and I found what was missing when I found God or perhaps He found me.
 
Upvote 0

joshua 1 9

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 11, 2015
17,420
3,593
Northern Ohio
✟314,607.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Simply and demonstrably false.
You need to read the surveys that show that MOST people in American believe in God. That means they believe in Divine Cause. There are quite a few YEC people that claim the earth is only 6,000 years old but if they did their homework they would see the evidence that Bill Nye and science has to substantiate what we learn from Science about the age of the Earth and the age of the Universe. American maybe disconnected from religion but they do believe in God. Bill Nye shows us why people are not more connected because the religions are having a problem keeping up with Science and the new evidence and discoveries we have.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.