- Oct 17, 2015
- 15,722
- 16,445
- 82
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Unorthodox
- Marital Status
- Married
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Gould was a anti creationist and he died a early death. His side kick Eldridge reminded agnostic and he is still alive today.
You can not tell me the exact age of the earth.
You can not tell me if God created the Sun or the Moon first.
The Sun came first because the Sun is still not a solid. It took a while for the earth to cool enough to become a solid.And the sun came first.
The Sun came first because the Sun is still not a solid. It took a while for the earth to cool enough to become a solid.
... Even Theistic Evolution is Creationism. ..... To be against Creationism means you are against Divine Cause not against the YEC Creationism.
... These are the sort of inconsistency that should cause him to be more careful to qualify what he says sense so much of his audience is Creationist.
... To be against Creationism means you are against Divine Cause not against the YEC Creationism.
I used to love and respect Bill Nye. But now I have no respect or love for him after some horrible remarks he he made that essentially say christians are weak minded, stupid people who have the brains of apes and believe in an idiotic concept and that we hold back the world g from progressing/advancing. >.< Its fine to agree to disagree with someone who believes different. But to slam them and disrespect them like that is what little kids do, not grown adults.
But now I have no respect or love for him after some horrible remarks he he made that essentially say christians are weak minded, stupid people who have the brains of apes and believe in an idiotic concept and that we hold back the world g from progressing/advancing
The sheer volume of people even today who experience encounters with the supernatural is enough to raise suspicions in any open mind.
Close minds remain closed, and are of little value.
If God exists logic would suggest that he would have some contact with the world He created.
We have that.
His word would be consistent. It is. Being omniscient He would be able to make predictions which would come true centuries later. We see that. If His creation was in danger he would do what he could to save it. He sent His son Jesus Christ.
His word may be disputed or disbelieved, but never proven false. That is the case.
Being God, His actions would not be bound by the physical laws of His creation.
We see that as well.
If the supernatural existed, modern man would see the same unexplainable things as primitive man. That happens.
So, then, it is entirely possible that the supernatural exists, and that existence can neither be validated or invalidate by science.
A God capable of creating the world in 6 billion years could create it in 6 days or six minutes. What He could NOT do is lie about it, since lying is contrary to His nature.
if you have a poor understanding of science and do not know its limitations, you can claim that science disproves this or science disproves that. You can say that an ax head cannot float, but you cannot say that a supernatural God could make it do so because you cannot disprove the existence of God.
This is again, self-contradictory.While God cannot be proven in the physical world, He can be known.
No, because then this manifestation could be demonstrated in some way or another.His presence can be experienced. His peace can be felt.
To those who truly seek much will be revealed. It's possible for any of us to discover the supernatural presence of God.
Seek Him and you will find Him. Once you accept the Lord on faith the Holy Spirit will reveal His wonders to you and you will come to know an entirely different existence you never knew existed.
The sheer volume of people even today who experience encounters with the supernatural is enough to raise suspicions in any open mind. Close minds remain closed, and are of little value.
If God exists logic would suggest that he would have some contact with the world He created.
That is the definition that atheists use to try to promote their agenda. They hijacked the dictionary to promote their cause. We do not use the skeptics bible and we should not use the atheists dictionary. Evolutionism should reject atheism and their dictionary because real science is agnostic not atheistic. The real cause that atheism harms is the cause of science when they defile the purity and pollute science with their propaganda and error. They claim this has nothing to do with their lifestyle, but according to the Bible and early church fathers atheism results when people do not want to honor God in the way they live their life. They live a life of rebellion. They usually deny this though. Even they will claim they live a life better then Christians.the common use of the term "Creationism" is "evolution denial".
There are all kinds of Creationisms which he is not trained or equipped to argue against.
That is the definition that atheists use to try to promote their agenda. They hijacked the dictionary to promote their cause. We do not use the skeptics bible and we should not use the atheists dictionary.
Yes Ken Ham was trying to show that the earth is only 6,000 years old.
Most everyone is OEC. The vast majority of people in america believe in God as the Divine Cause of the world and the Universe and they believe the earth is as old as Science says it is. I can understand why Bill the science guy is concerned with YEC and why he feels a need to try to show how much the evidence disproves a YEC. Even though as I say Adam and Eve did live 6,000 years ago in the Garden of Eden. But clearly the earth has been around for a lot longer then that. Just like we know that Noah's Flood was not world wide. From our perspective we would call it a local flood. But if you are the one that is effected by a flood than it is your world that is destoryed. The story of Noah is written from Noah's perspective. Not the perspective of an outsider looking in. It is very important to understand this when you read the Bible. We are use to books that are written from our perspective as a reader. That is not how the Bible is written.Since there are very few OECs
It is not appropriate to argue against YEC and call it Creationism. IT is bate and switch. If he has evidence against OEC then he needs to present his evidence. If he has evidence against dispensationalism then he needs to present his evidence. Like I said Evolutionism is Creationism so Bill Nye is pretty much presenting an argument against himself and science. They want to hijack the dictionary and people need to be made aware of what they are doing and the disservice they are doing to science. This is going to chase young people away from science not draw them in the way they want to draw the young people's interest to science and the good they claim that science can do.Thus, it's completely appropriate for Bill Nye to say he's against "creationism".
Yes that is the debate on the internet right now and I think Bill did a good job to present a case against a young earth. I just don't like the way he says all creationism is wrong because there are a lot more old earth creationists then there are young earth creationists. Quite a few are young earth so I can see why he would want to invest in trying to show them that the evidence does not support the earth being young and I agree that the kangaroo is the best evidence for that. How did the kangaroo get from Australia to Noah's Ark before the flood and then back to Australia after the flood. There are 10,000 islands in the Pacific and they all have their own unique biodiversity based on the biodiversity that was established BEFORE the ice melted during the last ice age. There was extensive flooding in Australia around 12,000 years ago when the ice age came to an end and the ocean level raised putting a lot of land underwater. That is why I can defend that a day is 1,000 years because it fits all the scientific evidence. The problem with the day age theory is that the days would have to be half the length of the day that comes before it. Schroeder is a day age creationist and that is what he defends in his books an the articles he writes for the internet. Bill Nye wants to defend the young people and so do I. I want the young people to get an honest presentation of science. One that does not conflict with what they learn and study in their sunday school classes. If there is a conflict they may reject science and that could be a loss for society that could have benefited from their getting a education in science. My son is very advanced in science and he is taking college science classes in High School. So I am willing to sacrifice some of his religious training to get him a good education in science. My other son studied electronic engineering in College so he also has a very good education in science.Wasn't Nye debating Ken Ham?
Yes that is the debate on the internet right now and I think Bill did a good job to present a case against a young earth. I just don't like the way he says all creationism is wrong because there are a lot more old earth creationists then there are young earth creationists.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?