Big Bang

Dal M. · Mar 20, 2005

Wonderfulcross said:
What I wrote is exactly what I heard come out of 15 different scientists' mouths.

So not one of these scientists knew about the nebular theory of planetary formation or that the Earth's orbit is elliptical? What kind of "scientists" did they talk to in this video? Dentists like Cuozzo? Lawyers like Johnson?

caravelair · Mar 20, 2005

Wonderfulcross said:
What I wrote is exactly what I heard come out of 15 different scientists' mouths. They were in a video called A Question of Origins. I didn't even go on to websites for this information. Where and when did you get you information.

i got my information while obtaining my degree in astrophysics. are you sure these were actually scientists you were watching? did any of them have qualifications in relevant fields? are you going to answer any of the rebuttals to your post, or are you admitting you were wrong about all of that?

GodsSamus · Jun 14, 2005

Sky said:
Do you think the Big Bang theory is false or true? I don't beleve the big bang is contrary to the Bible since God could have caused it. It IS, however, contrary to the YEC theory, which claims the univers is only a few years old. What do you think?

Well, three of the planets are spinning BACKWARDS. Besides, why would God try to trick us? The truth is, the Big Bang defies literally EVERY law of the universe. It's a big, gigantic dud.

Elduran · Jun 14, 2005

GodsSamus said:
Well, three of the planets are spinning BACKWARDS. Besides, why would God try to trick us? The truth is, the Big Bang defies literally EVERY law of the universe. It's a big, gigantic dud.

No, really, it isn't.

Would you mind explaining the issue with the planets spinning backwards? Would you care to state exactly how the Big Bang defies all the laws that were created during or after the big bang?

Or would you like to ignore the issues again?

Robert the Pilegrim · Jun 14, 2005

Elduran said:
Would you mind explaining the issue with the planets spinning backwards?

I don't think any planet is spinning backwards compared to the rest of the solar system, maybe three moons are. Either Neptune or Uranus is spinning at a right angle, which is not a trivial problem but hardly the death knell of astrophysics.

lawtonfogle · Jun 14, 2005

anti matter does exist. now for where is the anti of all the matter around us, we don't know, but chance could be some galaxies formed of complete matter or anti, and other just blew up at first, and this went on and on. after a while the 'pure galaxies' were far enough to be safe.

Can bigbang go with God, maybe, it can fit, but im not saying it does.

lawtonfogle · Jun 14, 2005

as far as defying the laws of physics, it did. But that is due to the fact normal physics do not apply to where the matter is condensed so that quantum physics and Newtonian physics do not go together.

Late_Cretaceous · Jun 14, 2005

No, really, it isn't.

Would you mind explaining the issue with the planets spinning backwards? Would you care to state exactly how the Big Bang defies all the laws that were created during or after the big bang?

Or would you like to ignore the issues again?

I don't think that he realizes that the spin in a planet has nothing to do with the big bang, and everything to do with a vortex. As the nebular cloud collapsed many vortices were present (they are present in any moving gas) some of those provided the spin direction for the planets. Not all vortices have to spin in the same direction in a huge nebula (just look at a cloud of smoke). Even a tornado, which looks like one big vortex, can have several vortices inside of it with different directions of spin.

Matthew777 · Jun 14, 2005

The Ultimate Question of Origins: God and the Beginning of the Universe
Dr. William Lane Craig
http://www.leaderu.com/offices/bill...ism-origin.html

A Swift and Simple Refutation of the Kalam Cosmological Argument?
Dr. William Lane Craig
http://www.leaderu.com/offices/bill...kalam-oppy.html

Creation and Big Bang Cosmology
Dr. William Lane Craig
http://www.leaderu.com/offices/bill...s/creation.html

Lucretius · Jun 14, 2005

How can you guys believe an explosion of nothing made something? Have you ever seen a Big Bang? Duh, no. Then it's not true. Explosions cause disorder, not order! Evos are always wrong!

Matthew777 · Jun 14, 2005

Big Bang cosmology has to be the best physical evidence we have for the existence of God.

Jet Black · Jun 15, 2005

Hector Medina said:
Sky77

The Big Bang is a BIG DUD!

And to go into it;they claim anti-matter fills in the gaps because everything is not evenly ditributed(the clumps of stars and galaxys,etc)there is 0 evdence that anti-matter is even possible or would exist!
RIDICULOUS

-Hector

thanks for making it so abundantly clear that you don't actually know a thing about the BB. I suggest getting a bit of an education in these things before you commit more false witness.

Jet Black · Jun 15, 2005

Matthew777 said:
Big Bang cosmology has to be the best physical evidence we have for the existence of God.

not really, unless you are one of those people who ignores the fact that there is a problem with the predictions before about 1 planck time.

Elduran · Jun 15, 2005

there is 0 evdence that anti-matter is even possible or would exist!

This is probably quite breaking news to the scientists who have actually made anti-matter in labs then!

Big Bang

...more things in heaven and earth, Horatio...

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Disruptive influence

Senior Veteran

My solace my terror, my terror my solace.

My solace my terror, my terror my solace.

&lt;font color=&quot;#880000&quot; &gt;&lt;/font&g

Faith is the evidence of things unseen

Senior Veteran

Faith is the evidence of things unseen

Jet Black

Guest

Jet Black

Guest

Disruptive influence

Similar threads

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency

<font color="#880000" ></font&g