Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Biden’s Amendments Hand U.S. Sovereignty to the WHO
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ligurian" data-source="post: 76701623" data-attributes="member: 434210"><p>"If the notification received by WHO involves the competency of the <strong> International Atomic Energy Agency</strong> (IAEA), the <strong>Food and Agriculture Organization</strong> (FAO), the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) or other relevant entities, WHO shall immediately notify"</p><p></p><p>"Article 10.3. When WHO receives information of an event that may constitute a public health emergency of international concern, it shall offer within 24 hours to collaborate with the State Party concerned in assessing <strong>the potential for international disease spread</strong>, possible interference with international traffic and the adequacy of control measures."</p><p></p><p>Can anyone tell me what "the International Atomic Energy Agency" has to do with "the potential for international disease spread"? And the Food and Agriculture Organization... that's the UN, right? </p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 18px">Does adding yet more people to this "flow of information" ever actually help?</span></span></p><p></p><p>"Article 10.3.When WHO receives information of an event that may constitute a public health emergency of international concern, it shall offer within 24 hours to collaborate with the State Party concerned in assessing the potential for international disease spread, possible interference with international traffic and the adequacy of control measures. Such activities <strong>may include collaboration with other standard-setting organizations</strong> and the offer to mobilize international assistance in order to support the national authorities in conducting and coordinating on-site assessments.</p><p>...</p><p>4. If the State Party does not accept the offer of collaboration within 48 hours, WHO shall, when justified by the magnitude of the public health risk, immediately share with other States Parties the information available to it, whilst encouraging the State Party to accept the offer of collaboration by WHO, taking into account the views of the State Party concerned."</p><p></p><p>1.In General, this is a cooperative agreement of two or more parties to work jointly towards a common goal. The involved parties may or may not have had any previous relationship. 2. In Knowledge management (KM), Collaboration is a key tenet of KM. This is essential to generating and maintaining a competitive advantage as the effective method of transferring ‘know how’ to a team of individuals. 3. In Negotiations, this is a conflict resolution strategy of using both assertiveness and cooperation to gain solutions worthwhile to all parties. It succeeds best when the interaction among them is directed at attaining common goals and where participants’ goals are compatible.</p><p><a href="https://thelawdictionary.org/collaboration/" target="_blank">What is COLLABORATION? definition of COLLABORATION (Black's Law Dictionary)</a></p><p></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 18px">And what are these <strong>"standard-setting organizations"</strong> they're talking about? Are they something like FEMA?</span></span></p><p><span style="font-family: 'Georgia'"><span style="font-size: 18px"></span></span></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ligurian, post: 76701623, member: 434210"] "If the notification received by WHO involves the competency of the [B] International Atomic Energy Agency[/B] (IAEA), the [B]Food and Agriculture Organization[/B] (FAO), the World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) or other relevant entities, WHO shall immediately notify" "Article 10.3. When WHO receives information of an event that may constitute a public health emergency of international concern, it shall offer within 24 hours to collaborate with the State Party concerned in assessing [B]the potential for international disease spread[/B], possible interference with international traffic and the adequacy of control measures." Can anyone tell me what "the International Atomic Energy Agency" has to do with "the potential for international disease spread"? And the Food and Agriculture Organization... that's the UN, right? [FONT=Georgia][SIZE=5]Does adding yet more people to this "flow of information" ever actually help?[/SIZE][/FONT] "Article 10.3.When WHO receives information of an event that may constitute a public health emergency of international concern, it shall offer within 24 hours to collaborate with the State Party concerned in assessing the potential for international disease spread, possible interference with international traffic and the adequacy of control measures. Such activities [B]may include collaboration with other standard-setting organizations[/B] and the offer to mobilize international assistance in order to support the national authorities in conducting and coordinating on-site assessments. ... 4. If the State Party does not accept the offer of collaboration within 48 hours, WHO shall, when justified by the magnitude of the public health risk, immediately share with other States Parties the information available to it, whilst encouraging the State Party to accept the offer of collaboration by WHO, taking into account the views of the State Party concerned." 1.In General, this is a cooperative agreement of two or more parties to work jointly towards a common goal. The involved parties may or may not have had any previous relationship. 2. In Knowledge management (KM), Collaboration is a key tenet of KM. This is essential to generating and maintaining a competitive advantage as the effective method of transferring ‘know how’ to a team of individuals. 3. In Negotiations, this is a conflict resolution strategy of using both assertiveness and cooperation to gain solutions worthwhile to all parties. It succeeds best when the interaction among them is directed at attaining common goals and where participants’ goals are compatible. [URL='https://thelawdictionary.org/collaboration/']What is COLLABORATION? definition of COLLABORATION (Black's Law Dictionary)[/URL] [FONT=Georgia][SIZE=5]And what are these [B]"standard-setting organizations"[/B] they're talking about? Are they something like FEMA? [/SIZE][/FONT] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Biden’s Amendments Hand U.S. Sovereignty to the WHO
Top
Bottom