EnemyPartyII
Well-Known Member
Not one of these verses refers to Mutually consentual, homosexual love and intimacy.
Just saying it over and over doesn't make something true, even though thats what NARTH thinks
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Not one of these verses refers to Mutually consentual, homosexual love and intimacy.Already answered, your love for your boyfriend includes a sexual element which is wrong. Ie Gen 19, Lev 18 & 20, 1 Cor 6, 1 Tim 1, Romans 1, 2 Peter 2, Jude 1, Gen 2, Matt 19, Mark 10, Eph 5 etc.
How does my love differ in any respect from your love for your wife?To Andreusz,
Ok then it is the human idea of love, not God’s.
Pity then you didn’t learn how to recognise what is of Satan and what is of Jesus.
Already answered, your love for your boyfriend includes a sexual element which is wrong.
It’s the human idea. The sexual element of the love I have for my wife is in line with God’s purposes, sexual desires for the same sex are dysfunctional as God created woman for man, even biologically we can see it is dysfunctional.How does my love differ in any respect from your love for your wife?
By the Holy Spirit and according to the Biblical testimony I have cited and quoted.This raises a whole lot of questions , but perhaps the most important is: how do you know you are doing it correctly?
Why not, its quite clear. If you can understand my posts enough to ask questions about you have understood as much of what I have posted is Biblical quotes and citations.Why is it wrong? I cannot see any explanation in the passages you have cited.
How would you feel if someone told you that the love you feel for your wife or girlfriend is satanic and that you must give it up?
Whatever is not of God must be "given up". The love of a man for a woman is ordained of God, so no, this doesn't have to be given up. Homosexuality is a perversion of the original plan and purpose of God...therefore it is terribly WRONG.
This is probably the most unconvincing argument against homosexuality EVER.
It is perverted because God’s word saysWhy is it perverted? I mean from my own personal standpoint hetrosexual sex is pretty gross to me but it dosent mean I go out of my way to make life difficult for hetrosexual people now does it?
The passages such as Romans 1 where men lust after men and commit indecent acts with other men is not heterosexual, its homosexual, by definition.There is no real evidence in the Bible that homosexuality is condemned just interpretation.
To Andreusz,
Its the human idea. The sexual element of the love I have for my wife is in line with Gods purposes, sexual desires for the same sex are dysfunctional as God created woman for man, even biologically we can see it is dysfunctional.
By the Holy Spirit
and according to the Biblical testimony I have cited and quoted.
Whatever is not of God must be "given up". The love of a man for a woman is ordained of God, so no, this doesn't have to be given up. Homosexuality is a perversion of the original plan and purpose of God...therefore it is terribly WRONG.
Or any other infertile heterosexual couple?Why is it okay for 60-year-old heterosexuals to marry?
Or any other infertile heterosexual couple?
Let me save everyone some time... there is no way to condemn homosexuality for being against "God's purpose" or "God's design", without condemning all infertile couples, and, for that matter, any use of contraception.
But We won't see heterosexual acts being condemned, because "God's design/purpose" isn't REALLY what these people are so worked up about.
They aren't deciding "X is God's purpose, and therefore, we should look at anything to determine if it fits that purpose"
No.
They start with the a priori assumption that "homosexuality is bad", and then try to find justifications for that belief, no matter how tenuous or convoluted. Hence, we get them clinging to the "design" argument like a drowning man clings to a branch, even though logically it holds no water.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?