• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Biblical Tithing is about Food - not money.

JackRT

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2015
15,722
16,445
82
small town Ontario, Canada
✟767,445.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Unorthodox
Marital Status
Married
Would you mind EXPLAINING yourself and what you point is. I did quote this passage, in point two of my post. thank you.

My apologies. In scanning your post I did not pick up on your citations in your second point. Put it down to me supporting your POV.
 
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,818
✟368,235.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I would also like to add something about food tithes in the Old Testament.

My understanding is that since there was not much of a system like we have today where we work and are given money, per se that in Israel back then much of your money or prosperity was in what you indeed did own or what would happen.

For instance, because the Israelite's depended upon their livestock for food, that sacrificing their livestock and their BEST livestock to God would have taken been something that would be very like what we today considerd money.

If they sacrifice their best livestock than that animal is of more value, much more than just as a food source. Your best livestock would be the ones that you would want to breed to have superior livestock genetically in all of your flock. So then sacrficing that animal you are giving up, per se what that animal could have been to your flock and what you could have done with that animal (like breeding for better genetics) for a long time in the future because animals breed for many years and with diffrent sheep/or partners as we would see it as human beings.

My understanding is that it was a big sacrifice to take the best livestock and give it to God in the sense that it affected the future what one was then unable to do with that livestock because it was gone and dead, due to sacrifice.
 
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
24,717
5,558
46
Oregon
✟1,103,486.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
You can tithe anything, time, energy, effort, material things, food, love, care, kindness, compassion, empathy, ANYTHING... Especially if your doing it for God, because of God, or on his behalf, or because of him...

Tithe is synonymous with sowing or investing that can be anything... Which, done in faith, will come with benefits and rewards, and a return to you... But, it can be different from what you tithed... For example you could tithe or sow or invest one good, positive thing and get back a different good, positive thing as a reaping from what you tithed...

But, if you sow bad things, you might reap bad things back and in return as well, for "whatever a man sows (good or bad) that shall he reap (whether good or bad) also known as karma...

God Bless!
 
Upvote 0

robert skynner

I respect the Bible but religion is damaging
Jun 29, 2016
324
56
Plymouth, UK
✟31,708.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private

Do you have a scriptural verse where people tithed things other than food and money (as taxes to the King / Roman Emperor).
 
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
24,717
5,558
46
Oregon
✟1,103,486.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
Do you have a scriptural verse where people tithed things other than food and money (as taxes to the King / Roman Emperor).
The principle was instituted to teach us about spiritual food and spiritual riches as well...

"Whatever a man sows, that shall he reap" Scriptually meaning "Whatever a man sows, that shall he reap"

Applies to "whatever"... Is that clear or basic enough...?

What do you suppose "Whatever" means...?

God Bless!
 
Upvote 0

robert skynner

I respect the Bible but religion is damaging
Jun 29, 2016
324
56
Plymouth, UK
✟31,708.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private

Give me a clear verse, chapter and verse please, don't quote scripture without the reference!

Secondly, Galatians 6:7 is not talking about money, look at the entire context from verse 1 to 10: 1Brothers and sisters, if someone is caught in a sin, you who live by the Spirit should restore that person gently. But watch yourselves, or you also may be tempted. 2Carry each other’s burdens, and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ. 3If anyone thinks they are something when they are not, they deceive themselves. 4Each one should test their own actions. Then they can take pride in themselves alone, without comparing themselves to someone else, 5for each one should carry their own load. 6Nevertheless, the one who receives instruction in the word should share all good things with their instructor. 7Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows. 8Whoever sows to please their flesh, from the flesh will reap destruction; whoever sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life. 9Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up.10Therefore, as we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, especially to those who belong to the family of believers.

So you can see that there is no reference to money here, the sowing and reaping refer to helping others, doing good, being kind or wicked to others, it's our good works which are the context - see verse 9. The word "whatever" does not refer to tithing, you've simply been misled by some preacher to read that (TITHING) into the text of this verse Galatians 6:7. "Whatever" refers to our human actions, i.e. our own good deeds, whatever they are, but this cannot refer to tithing as it would be a sin for a Christian to try to place themselves under the Mosaic tithe laws, which were exclusively given to Israel (Leviticus 27:34) never to gentiles who are exempt from the law (Psalm 147:19-20). Please don't read your presuppositions into the text of the Bible, I know that you are a genuine and sincere person, however, to mix law keeping with grace (under the new covenant) is wrong as that's falling from grace alone - see Galatians 6:4.

Finally, there is no "tithing principle" but Creflo Dollar invented that term in order to milk congregants like cows out of their money.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
24,717
5,558
46
Oregon
✟1,103,486.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
Tithing was never given to gentiles or to Christians.

Sowing and reaping is a universal truth, do you not even read the scripture your quoting?

Sowing and reaping is a universal truth and principle, like karma, that applies to anything... And you may not get back exactly the things you sow, but you will get good for good, and bad for bad...

I know this is right... And the scripture confirms it... (Psalms 126:5) (Job 4:8) (Hosea 10:12) for starters...

God Bless!
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

robert skynner

I respect the Bible but religion is damaging
Jun 29, 2016
324
56
Plymouth, UK
✟31,708.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private


But the context is obviously SPIRITUAL blessings, not money, these verses are not talking about money at all. Also "Karma" is a Hindu concept and is foreign to the new testament, which states that we only live once (Hebrews 9:27), whilst karma teaches that we live many different lives.
 
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,818
✟368,235.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I disagree with the specific reference to 'sowing and reaping'. It is my understanding that a tithe is specifically an offering to God of what is good.

Even Christians sow and reap bad things. We sin and then we reap those issues from sin, both in this physical world and spiritually because they are against God, until we repent.

I believe a tithe is something offered to the Lord, so it cannot be sowing and reaping, IMHO because then we would be offering our bad things, like sin, too.

Does that make sense?
 
Upvote 0

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
24,717
5,558
46
Oregon
✟1,103,486.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
Hebrews 9:27 could be talking about our spiritual death here, and after our prior spirit being judged, get and become born-again with a new spirit, that will not be judged any longer, but that is eternal...

Spirits can live in us that have been around a while though, but we are not privy to that spirits prior lives in other humans existence though...

Karma not including past lives, but only pertaining to this one, is the same concept as you reap what you sow though... I agree that sowing spiritual things, rather than fleshly things, like money, is... the spiritual is far better than the fleshly... Sow to the flesh, reap corruption... Sow money, even if you get a substancial return, is only corruption or a corruptible thing, that corrupts you, that you are still a slave to in your life, a thing of the flesh...

God Bless!
 
Upvote 0

spruikah

Member
Jan 13, 2017
12
6
South America
✟23,082.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I think even the question about whether tithing is food or money needs to be put on hold while we work out if tithing of any kind is a Christian practice. I do not think it is.

I see nowhere in the NT that supports tithing as a Christian practice. But it is part of the OT law. The NT is about following Christ, being led by God's Spirit, and giving generously... not under obligation but with a cheerful and generous heart.

The early Christians didn't tithe, they actually shared everything they had with one another, and there were not needy people in the Church (Acts 2:44-45). It's sad to see that nowadays Christians have to be pressured and forced with Bible texts to hand over even 10% of their wealth to the organization that supposedly is their spiritual family.

Someone on this thread said that having a church means paying bills and therefore people need to tithe (or words to that effect). And I think right there, there is a serious problem. The problem is assuming that "having a church" needs to be "having a special building where we gather once a week, and that needs air conditioning, lighting, sound equipment, furniture, etc., etc.".

If we go back to the early model of meeting in our homes, and sharing what we have with each other, we will find that instead of wasting our money on bills for a building that does not really represent a church, we can invest it instead on the real needs that we have amongst us PLUS help people in need around us.
 
Upvote 0

Jim Langston

Non denominational fundamentalist
Site Supporter
Jul 9, 2005
839
406
61
Bellingham, WA
✟108,974.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

I started a thread about tbis topic back in October, about building Christuan tabernacles you might be interested in. Does the bible itself advocate building church buildings?
 
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,818
✟368,235.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I started a thread about tbis topic back in October, about building Christuan tabernacles you might be interested in. Does the bible itself advocate building church buildings?

Biblically each of us are a tabernacle. The Holy Spirit indwells us. So that is the tabernacle answer.

Church buildings are not needed, per se. But believers are to fellowship and edifying each other so we need to meet somewhere. Houses are too small.
 
Upvote 0

Jim Langston

Non denominational fundamentalist
Site Supporter
Jul 9, 2005
839
406
61
Bellingham, WA
✟108,974.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

I believe that was pretty much the consensus at the end, I believe.
 
Upvote 0

spruikah

Member
Jan 13, 2017
12
6
South America
✟23,082.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Church buildings are not needed, per se. But believers are to fellowship and edifying each other so we need to meet somewhere. Houses are too small.

I would question the statement that "houses are too small". I think the truth is that "church buildings are too big". The fact that church buildings are big means that, by nature, we have much more shallow relationships with each other, because there is very little intimacy between us. That houses are small is actually one of their strong points for meetings.

In a group of 10-15 people, you can really get to know each other and get involved in each other's lives. You can keep people accountable. And you can save a lot of money that would normally be wasted on a fancy building that is not needed.

If we want to meet as a larger body, we could restrict that to once a month, and possibly meet in parks, plazas, etc. or even rent a hall every now and then without the need to buy and maintain a fancy building. It's a sad truth that church buildings have become more a place for weekend entertainment than for real spiritual growth.
 
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,818
✟368,235.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
That could be true with parks, outside however I live in WI and it is very cold. Also there is rain and/or bugs or it could be very hot which older people could not take well.

The idea about houses, what I have an issue with is teaching. Many pastors are not trained well in scripture and lay people many have little Biblical knowlege. I think that sort of environment can be not good at all. Even the churches that Paul started had official offices ie pastor, deacons, elders, ect. These people had to meet the Biblical standards of these offices.

Home churches I think can be spiritually not edifying if circumstances are not controlled and the offices are not held to Biblical standards.
 
Upvote 0

robert skynner

I respect the Bible but religion is damaging
Jun 29, 2016
324
56
Plymouth, UK
✟31,708.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private

I found this an interesting and well written post! I would only add a few brief points, if I might. Firstly the tithe wasn't 10%. it was a tenth and those under the tithe taxation paid three tithes of a tenth not one. Secondly, Jews under the law who were subject to the tithe paid not just three tithes but approximately 10 to 13 offerings on top of that as well. Malachi 3:8 condemns the priests (Malachi 2:1) who were stealing from the tithes, yet Malachi 3:8 commands the paying of both tithes (plural) as well as offerings (plural), so those who claim that Christians are under the tithe laws today, but who only give a tenth, are according to their own false interpretation of Malachi 3:8 stealing from God when they aren't paying three tithes and at least 10 offerings on top of that.
 
Upvote 0

robert skynner

I respect the Bible but religion is damaging
Jun 29, 2016
324
56
Plymouth, UK
✟31,708.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private

What a brilliant insightful post. Well said, I hope that others read this too.
 
Upvote 0

robert skynner

I respect the Bible but religion is damaging
Jun 29, 2016
324
56
Plymouth, UK
✟31,708.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private


The context for Mark 12:44 and Luke 21:1-4 is religious hypocrisy, for in the previous verses Christ explains how the religious leaders steal widows houses: "Beware of the scribes, which desire to walk in long robes, and love greetings in the markets, and the highest seats in the synagogues, and the chief rooms at feasts; Which devour widows' houses, and for a shew make long prayers: the same shall receive greater damnation." (Luke 20:46-47). In the verses subsequent to this passage about the woman who gave her all, Christ speaks about the destruction of the temple (Luke 21:6), and then about deception by the religious leaders: "And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go ye not therefore after them." (Luke 21:8). So the context is obviously deception and theft by religious leaders, thus verses 1-4 are a practical example of a poor woman, who has been so brainwashed by these religious leaders, that she gave her all, and then obviously left the temple to starve! Christ isn't commending her, he's using her as an a example of a person deceived by these religious leaders.
 
Upvote 0