Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Biblical literalism and the story of creation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Alunyel" data-source="post: 52346098"><p>That still doesn't explain why it says God created the Sun after he created the Earth, when in reality, the Earth was created from the heavier elements that were produced as a result of fusion of H and He atoms, inside the Sun.</p><p></p><p>It doesn't explain why it says God created the rest of the stars after he had created our planet and our star, when there are millions and millions of stars, all a lot older than Earth.</p><p></p><p>It doesn't explain why it says God started out with a huge ball of water for Earth, when water comprises less than 1&#37; of all of Earth's mass. (If you want to be more accurate, it's actually less than 1/50th of 1%.)</p><p></p><p>I haven't even started.</p><p></p><p>All it does is provide an alternate story of how the universe was made, that contradicts almost everything the evidence points to and has absolutely no evidence to support itself. It doesn't explain much, but what it does explain, it quite clearly gets wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Alunyel, post: 52346098"] That still doesn't explain why it says God created the Sun after he created the Earth, when in reality, the Earth was created from the heavier elements that were produced as a result of fusion of H and He atoms, inside the Sun. It doesn't explain why it says God created the rest of the stars after he had created our planet and our star, when there are millions and millions of stars, all a lot older than Earth. It doesn't explain why it says God started out with a huge ball of water for Earth, when water comprises less than 1% of all of Earth's mass. (If you want to be more accurate, it's actually less than 1/50th of 1%.) I haven't even started. All it does is provide an alternate story of how the universe was made, that contradicts almost everything the evidence points to and has absolutely no evidence to support itself. It doesn't explain much, but what it does explain, it quite clearly gets wrong. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Biblical literalism and the story of creation
Top
Bottom