Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Biblical literalism and the story of creation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jester4kicks" data-source="post: 52325816" data-attributes="member: 205618"><p>I understand that, to many, the bible is the word of god. I also understand that there are times where the bible contains obvious analogies or metaphors.</p><p> </p><p>What I am asking of those who believe the bible <u>should</u> be interpretted literally, and specifically the story of creation, is <u>why</u> they think the story of creation was meant to be interpretted literally. It's a very strong position to take, so I would think that here would be at least some kind of foundation behind it.</p><p> </p><p>So far, nobody has shown any basis for that particular type of interpretation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jester4kicks, post: 52325816, member: 205618"] I understand that, to many, the bible is the word of god. I also understand that there are times where the bible contains obvious analogies or metaphors. What I am asking of those who believe the bible [U]should[/U] be interpretted literally, and specifically the story of creation, is [U]why[/U] they think the story of creation was meant to be interpretted literally. It's a very strong position to take, so I would think that here would be at least some kind of foundation behind it. So far, nobody has shown any basis for that particular type of interpretation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Biblical literalism and the story of creation
Top
Bottom