• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Ben Stein on Richard Nixon

Yoder777

Senior Veteran
Nov 11, 2010
4,782
458
✟30,081.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
As a speech writer and lawyer for the Nixon administration, Stein provides an interesting perspective:

 

MorkandMindy

Andrew Yang's Forward Party
Site Supporter
Dec 16, 2006
7,401
785
New Mexico
✟265,487.00
Country
United States
Faith
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Still very much the speech writer.


It is a necessary part of understanding history to assume the vilified leader believed he thought he was doing the right thing.

Mr Nixon believed Cambodia was effectively already in the American Vietnam War so it was OK to bomb the place extensively though without Congressional approval. He was right that Prince Sihanouk favoured Ho Chi Minh over Diem, but then so did the South Vietnamese. If a democratic decision had been made then Ho would have won by a landslide. The movement of population from North to South was not mainly to get away from Ho, though some of it was, but Catholic Vietnamese obeying a religious instruction and Ho supporters going South to swing the ballot there, a ballot that never happened.

So maybe Richard Nixon thought he was doing the right thing despite violating the right of Congress to make war.


The Post Nixon Era
But it certainly did not turn out for the best. By the end of the American Vietnam War in 1975 Cambodia was facing starvation. 75% of the draft animals were gone, and Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge were in power with their own ideas of how to solve that situation and I really don't think they were very good ideas.

In 1978 Vietnam invaded and set up a pro Soviet state. The UN continued to recognise Pol Pot's Khmer Rouge as the legitimate government of Cambodia, as did the United States, United Kingdom and Australia among others.

Throughout the 1980s the Khmer Rouge, supplied by Thailand, the United States[41][42] and the United Kingdom[43] continued to control much of the country and attacked territory not under their dominance. These attacks, compounded by total economic sanctions[44] from the United States and its allies, made reconstruction virtually impossible and left the country deeply impoverished.

Maybe Richard Nixon would not have supported Pol Pot, but I think that case would be difficult to make. The reason is that Richard Nixon could have ended the Vietnam War much sooner by arranging locations for the pro US officials to go to and finally allowing the Vietnamese to elect their very own hero - Ho.
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
42,558
20,397
Finger Lakes
✟325,111.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Stein is less than honest. I'm old enough to remember Nixon's final downfall and it wasn't about "a lie" (that was what Clinton was impeached for) - although the coverup of his illegal activities did include lies.

What Nixon did that was so bad was to use Federal agencies (CIA, FBI, IRS) to go after his personal enemies. He had people officially investigated because he didn't like their politics (abuse of power for personal gain). Daniel Elsberg's psychiatrist's office was burglarized. He had Democratic National Committee headquarters broken into. He fired the independent investigators he appointed when they got to close to discovery. He introduced "stonewalling" into the political lexicon, referring to his own obstruction of justice. He used campaign funds to pay at least one of the Watergate burglars (illegal use of campaign funds to sponsor illegal activities - double bad). The secret bombing of Cambodia and Thailand also played a part.

And he kept the evidence - the tapes. His vanity was even greater than his paranoia.

As for ending the war with Vietnam - how do you reconcile this with your own post that it was the Democratic Congress that got us out? You can't have it both ways.
 
Upvote 0

Yoder777

Senior Veteran
Nov 11, 2010
4,782
458
✟30,081.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
As for ending the war with Vietnam - how do you reconcile this with your own post that it was the Democratic Congress that got us out? You can't have it both ways.

The troops had already pulled out of Vietnam because of Nixon's efforts. Democrats didn't get us out, they betrayed the Vietnamese people after we had left.

While I don't think Nixon was a great president, I don't understand why we only look at the bad things he did, why he's always just the butt of a joke.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Gracchus

Senior Veteran
Dec 21, 2002
7,199
821
California
Visit site
✟38,182.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
The troops had already pulled out of Vietnam because of Nixon's efforts. Democrats didn't get us out, they betrayed the Vietnamese people after we had left.
Sending American troops to Viet Nam was a betrayal of the Vietnamese. Their fate was theirs to decide. It was not our business to interfere.

While I don't think Nixon was a great president, I don't understand why we only look at the bad things he did, why he's always just the butt of a joke rather than...
(?)
Nixon was not a joke. He was a tragedy. He was a foul-mouthed, vindictive, cynical hypocrite who put himself above the law.

Ben Stein, on the other hand, is a joke, although a sad one to be sure.

 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
42,558
20,397
Finger Lakes
✟325,111.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The troops had already pulled out of Vietnam because of Nixon's efforts. Democrats didn't get us out, they betrayed the Vietnamese people after we had left.
Spin, spin, spin.

While I don't think Nixon was a great president, I don't understand why we only look at the bad things he did, why he's always just the butt of a joke.
If you'd been around back then, you might understand. There has already been some revisionism about him, as you would expect. He rightly gets credit for opening relations with China and improving them with the USSR. He did advance civil rights (which many righties rail against even to this day) as much as that was started by presidents before him. He put a lot of environmental protection laws into place and formed the EPA (which many righties rail against even to this day). He also took the US off the gold standard (which many righties rail against even to this day) and instituted wage and price controls to combat the raging inflation.

But the Stein piece is just a whitewash, less about honoring Nixon than slapping at modern liberals. He tries to pooh-pooh the criminal activities and the paranoid vindictiveness of the man. In many ways, he can be seen as a good president but a bad man. The bad man overwhelmed the good president and perverted the office by using federal agencies for his personal vendettas.

He wasn't always the butt of the joke - he has a famous opera written about him and performed in the Metropolitan Opera House - how many other presidents can say the same?Nixon In China

Eisenhower was well before my time. JFK was nearly so. If he hadn't been assassinated, he undoubtedly would not have been so revered. I imagine LBJ was roundly ridiculed (again, before my political awareness), but, really, how effective is ridicule to a man who gives press interviews while doing his business on the toilet? With the door open :o

The press was merciless to Gerald Ford (Chevy Chase did funny Ford skits; Tina Fey was kind in comparison); he was made out to be a stumbling, bumbling fool (he really cashed in post-presidency). Carter was also ridiculed for his hominess and sincerity - cardigan sweater, walking to the White House post Inauguration, the attack rabbit, peanut farming, his toothy smile).

Reagan, for some reason, got a pass for the most part. The press simply liked him and fawned on him (movie star infatuation?). Bush Sr was not so lucky and he was disrespected compared to his predecessor but not to his successor.

Goodness knows, Clinton was harassed with unending, right-wing sponsored lawsuits and trillion dollar investigations culminating in impeachment. His wife was also ridiculed (murder list, furniture theft), but First Ladies are another story. I think Phil Hartman did the best Clinton impersonations.

Bush Jr, you're well aware of, I guess. He got a big break with the 9/11 attack - for years afterwards people barely dared to criticize the President of the United States - but that wore off towards the beginning of his second term.

The attacks on Obama began before he even took office and continue unabated.

Nixon is an interesting, deeply flawed character.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Yoder777

Senior Veteran
Nov 11, 2010
4,782
458
✟30,081.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Buddhist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
But the Stein piece is just a whitewash, less about honoring Nixon than slapping at modern liberals.

Stein voted for Ralph Nader. I think he's more interested in refuting the claims of liberals about Nixon than slapping liberals.


Reagan, for some reason, got a pass for the most part.

Like Bush Jr. after him, the press frequently accused Reagan as being unintelligent and incompetent.
 
Upvote 0