Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Exploring Christianity
Belief is not a choice
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="2PhiloVoid" data-source="post: 75787499" data-attributes="member: 167101"><p>It's definitely not a non-sequitur. Because whether you think your beliefs are voluntary or involuntary, the imaging done by neuorscientists won't come to bear upon the epistemic nature of Christian belief.</p><p></p><p>So, my dear Watson, if there's any non-sequitur being applied here, it is by you.</p><p></p><p>Moreover, your whole conceptual methodology of inquiry involving the creation of random, essentially already incredible notions for analogizing the nature of 'belief' is highly questionable.</p><p></p><p>Are you applying science here, or just shooting the breeze with your own stab at philosophy ... ?</p><p></p><p>Have you ever studied the field of the Philosophy of Science along with its side discipline known as the Nature of Science?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="2PhiloVoid, post: 75787499, member: 167101"] It's definitely not a non-sequitur. Because whether you think your beliefs are voluntary or involuntary, the imaging done by neuorscientists won't come to bear upon the epistemic nature of Christian belief. So, my dear Watson, if there's any non-sequitur being applied here, it is by you. Moreover, your whole conceptual methodology of inquiry involving the creation of random, essentially already incredible notions for analogizing the nature of 'belief' is highly questionable. Are you applying science here, or just shooting the breeze with your own stab at philosophy ... ? Have you ever studied the field of the Philosophy of Science along with its side discipline known as the Nature of Science? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Exploring Christianity
Belief is not a choice
Top
Bottom