Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes, it is mainstream among the Orthodox and ultra orthodox. I have read it several times, but without the legal machinations used to arrive at that conclusion.Does anyone know: Does this represent mainstream Jewish thought on the story? Or is Rabbi Goldson the Jewish equivalent of our Bishop Spong,
This popped up on my FB, considering the same issues: https://www.christiancentury.org/article/critical-essay/women-bible-say-metoo
Wow. Interesting article.This popped up on my FB, considering the same issues: https://www.christiancentury.org/article/critical-essay/women-bible-say-metoo
David was great when he was a warrior, but when he took the throne he crashed and failed in pretty much every way, including being a father.
That probably has something to do with "king" as a basic concept not being in God's plan for Israel.
Out of all the kings of Israel and divided Israel, there were very few who had been proclaimed "good" in God's eyes, and none from Northern Israel. Seems like the king concept was a huge failure overall.
The article mentioned the Sodom and Gomorrah story and Lot's daughters. Even before I knew what homosexuality was, I never really thought of that story having much to do with homosexuality. It was always more about rape. First they wanted to rape the male guests and then Lot offered his daughters up for rape.
It also makes me wonder if the only real reason that Lot and his family was saved was for Abraham's sake and not because Lot was a good man on his own. Yes, I've read about all the claims about hospitality and that Lot didn't have any other choice, but it tends to ring false with me. He seems just as depraved as the rest of the town to think that what he decided to do was acceptable. Maybe he should have offered himself to the mob if he was going to offer anyone to them.
Very true.If a nation is hard-hearted towards it poor, it doesn't make any difference to God how "righteous" they may act in other regards.
I have come to that conclusion as well, partly through reflecting on Abraham's argument with God. Abraham argues with God until they agree that the city will be spared if there are 10 righteous people. If you count up Lot, his wife, his daughters, whatever household servants or extended family they had, it probably comes to 10. And the city wasn't spared. So I suspect that Lot was indeed saved for Abraham's sake.It also makes me wonder if the only real reason that Lot and his family was saved was for Abraham's sake and not because Lot was a good man on his own.
I have come to that conclusion as well, partly through reflecting on Abraham's argument with God. Abraham argues with God until they agree that the city will be spared if there are 10 righteous people. If you count up Lot, his wife, his daughters, whatever household servants or extended family they had, it probably comes to 10. And the city wasn't spared. So I suspect that Lot was indeed saved for Abraham's sake.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?