Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Basic Creationism Is Supported By Science
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bradskii" data-source="post: 76093387" data-attributes="member: 412388"><p>The hole represents our little planet. It's safe here. It has allowed life. Which has developed according to the parameters available.</p><p></p><p>You can take two views. The first is that Man is the ultimate aim of the whole shooting match. In which case the odds of this small blue dot (and the general scientific constants of the universe) being a random sequence of events which produced us would be as improbable as the odds quoted earlier.</p><p></p><p>The second view is that this small blue dot (and the general scientific constants of the universe) are themselves random and that therefore...so are we.</p><p></p><p>So the hole was either designed exactly as the puddle needed it to be, or it is just a random shape and size which determined the size and shape of the puddle. Equally random.</p><p></p><p>Needless to say I go with the second option. Which makes any argument regarding the wonders of fine tuning totally irrelevant.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bradskii, post: 76093387, member: 412388"] The hole represents our little planet. It's safe here. It has allowed life. Which has developed according to the parameters available. You can take two views. The first is that Man is the ultimate aim of the whole shooting match. In which case the odds of this small blue dot (and the general scientific constants of the universe) being a random sequence of events which produced us would be as improbable as the odds quoted earlier. The second view is that this small blue dot (and the general scientific constants of the universe) are themselves random and that therefore...so are we. So the hole was either designed exactly as the puddle needed it to be, or it is just a random shape and size which determined the size and shape of the puddle. Equally random. Needless to say I go with the second option. Which makes any argument regarding the wonders of fine tuning totally irrelevant. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Basic Creationism Is Supported By Science
Top
Bottom