Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, but I can show that point number four (yours) is not true. Let's take a look at this by way of analogy. Specifically, let's go with Acts 3:15 and pretend that God is in some way like an author. am able to consider individual events, in sequence or as a strategic whole, from that time period, so long as I am properly informed, because I am not contained by it.
This is not fanciful thinking. It's just basic Christian theology. You can't deny point number one without denying God's self-existence, which then means he cannot be the creator of the universe. You can't deny point two without denying point one, because the second point definitively follows from the first point. If you deny the third point, then you deny the deity of Christ. The first two make you a monotheist. The third makes you a Christian.
Does Grudem not know enough about biblical hermeneutics to realize that the book of Psalms is NOT a reliable source upon which to base a theological opinion?
remember the former things of old;
for I am God, and there is no other;
I am God, and there is none like me,
10 declaring the end from the beginning
and from ancient times things not yet done,
saying, ‘My counsel shall stand,
and I will accomplish all my purpose (ESV).
The times of ignorance God overlooked, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent, because he has fixed a day on which he will judge the world in righteousness by a man whom he has appointed; and of this he has given assurance to all by raising him from the dead” (ESV).
Where is the scriptural evidence that Grudem cited to support his absurd notion that is refuted by the hundreds of passages in the Bible that teach a sequence of events and the cause and effect of each of those events? Does Grudem not know enough about biblical hermeneutics to realize that the book of Psalms is NOT a reliable source upon which to base a theological opinion?
The Nicene Creed, which Grudem seems to ignore, affirms that the Lord Jesus Christ, the Son of God, is “of the essence of the Father,” and is “of one substance with the Father.” God, in the person of the Lord Jesus Christ, the Alpha and the Omega (and therefore not “timeless”), most certainly did not see “all of time simultaneously.” Theology that expressly and explicitly contradicts the Nicene Creed (as well as the Bible!) is NOT orthodox theology and does NOT belong in the Baptist forum.
That is your view of the lack of authority and reliability of the Psalms. In fact, it's affirming your low view of Scripture - the Psalms.
This is the biblical view that I, a Baptist, take with regard to Scripture - all of Scripture - (and so does Wayne Grudem, professor of theology & biblical studies at Phoenix Seminary): 'AllScripture isbreathed out by Godand profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, 17 that the man of God may be complete, equipped for every good work' (2 Tim 3:16-17 ESV).
The Scriptures do not affirm the authority of creeds. The Nicene Creed is a useful summary of theology, but it is not authoritative as are the Scriptures.
The Scriptures affirm that God's attribute ofeternity/infinityis not shared by us. According to Job 36:26, Elihu said of God, 'Behold, God is great, and we know him not; the number of his years is unsearchable' (ESV).
God's eternity is suggested by NT passages such as Rev 1:8, 'I am the Alpha and Omega, says the Lord God, who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty' (ESV). So, God's eternity is affirmed in both OT and NT, the reliable Scriptures that are 'breathed out by God' and have a guess what? They are 'profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness' to equip us for God's good work in our lives. That applies to you and me and all Christians on this forum.
Thus,God is timeless in his being. God was never created so he did not begin to exist. See Gen 1:1; 1 Cor 8:6; Col1:16; Heb 1:2.
Second Peter 3:8 confirms thatGod sees all of time equally: 'But do not overlook this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day' (ESV). Isaiah 46:9-10 affirms similar teaching:
This attribute of God's eternity/infinity is demonstrated in time, where all human beings exist: Acts 17:30-31 provides but one example:
You can denigrate the Psalms, but that view is not supported by the doctrine of Scripture I've cited above, but the Scriptures affirm God's eternity where:
That's Bible, and denigrating the Psalms is an avoidance mechanism in dealing with the authority and teaching of Scripture on God's eternity/infinity.
- God is timeless in his being;
- He sees all time equally; and
- God acts in time - the time we experience.
If you don't believe the Psalms are a reliable source for theology, why don't you start a new thread with a title such as, 'The Psalms are unreliable teaching on biblical Christianity'. I look forward to the response when and if you bring Psalm 23 into that view.
Oz
I believe Baptists would not agree with this part of the Nicene Creed: "We acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins."
Why are you arguing against positions that I have never taken in any post in any thread at Christian Forums? In very numerous posts I have affirmed the inspiration of Scripture. And of course God is infinite and man is finite! However, I do recognize the clear and obvious truth that the Psalms are written in a genre of literature that expresses feelings of emotion rather than objective facts—as they were intended to! Psalms 23 is an excellent example of this:
Psalms 23
The Divine Shepherd
A Psalm of David.
1. The Lord is my shepherd, I shall not want.
2. He makes me lie down in green pastures;
he leads me beside still waters; {Heb [waters of rest]}
3. he restores my soul. {Or [life]}
He leads me in right paths {Or [paths of righteousness]}
for his name's sake.
4. Even though I walk through the darkest valley, {Or [the valley of the shadow of death]}
I fear no evil;
for you are with me;
your rod and your staff—
they comfort me.
5. You prepare a table before me
in the presence of my enemies;
you anoint my head with oil;
my cup overflows.
6. Surely {Or [Only]} goodness and mercy {Or [kindness]} shall follow me
all the days of my life,
and I shall dwell in the house of the Lord
my whole life long. {Heb [for length of days]} (NRSV)
When this psalm is compared with the historical record of David found in Samuel, 1 Kings, and 1 Chronicles, we find one historical contradiction after another. Indeed, there is next to nothing historically accurate in the psalm! When this psalm is compared with Old Testament theology, we find one theological contradiction after another. Indeed, there is next to nothing theologically accurate in the psalm! This inspired psalm was not written as a treatise on ancient Hebrew history or theology—it is an inspired psalm! The same thing is true of the other 149 psalms.
2 Peter 3:3. First of all you must understand this, that in the last days scoffers will come, scoffing and indulging their own lusts
4. and saying, “Where is the promise of his coming? For ever since our ancestors died, all things continue as they were from the beginning of creation!”
5. They deliberately ignore this fact, that by the word of God heavens existed long ago and an earth was formed out of water and by means of water,
6. through which the world of that time was deluged with water and perished.
7. But by the same word the present heavens and earth have been reserved for fire, being kept until the day of judgment and destruction of the godless.
8. But do not ignore this one fact, beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years are like one day.
9. The Lord is not slow about his promise, as some think of slowness, but is patient with you, not wanting any to perish, but all to come to repentance. (NRSV)
These words from Peter do NOT in any way, shape, or form even vaguely suggest that “God sees all of time equally.” Who is man to say that “God sees all of time equally”?
Romans 11:33. O the depth of the riches and wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable are his judgments and how inscrutable his ways!
34. “For who has known the mind of the Lord?
Or who has been his counselor?”
35. “Or who has given a gift to him,
to receive a gift in return?”
36. For from him and through him and to him are all things. To him be the glory forever. Amen. (NRSV)
1 Corinthians 2. Now we have received not the spirit of the world, but the Spirit that is from God, so that we may understand the gifts bestowed on us by God.
13. And we speak of these things in words not taught by human wisdom but taught by the Spirit, interpreting spiritual things to those who are spiritual.
14. Those who are unspiritual do not receive the gifts of God’s Spirit, for they are foolishness to them, and they are unable to understand them because they are spiritually discerned.
15. Those who are spiritual discern all things, and they are themselves subject to no one else’s scrutiny.
16. “For who has known the mind of the Lord
so as to instruct him?”
But we have the mind of Christ. (NRSV)
Why are you arguing against positions that I have never taken in any post in any thread at Christian Forums? In very numerous posts I have affirmed the inspiration of Scripture.
When this psalm is compared with the historical record of David found in Samuel, 1 Kings, and 1 Chronicles, we find one historical contradiction after another. Indeed, there is next to nothing historically accurate in the psalm! When this psalm is compared with Old Testament theology, we find one theological contradiction after another.
How do you think that Baptists would understand 'one baptism' in Ephesians 4:4-6,
'4 There is one body and one Spirit—just as you were called to the one hope that belongs to your call— 5 one Lord, one faith, one baptism, 6 one God and Father of all, who is over all and through all and in all' (ESV).
Interesting that baptists tend to believe that God offers people choices, of our own free will to love him, whearas those of the calvinist perusuasion like to insist that God has just fixed peoples lives before they were even born, whether to be his or not.
This calvinist interpretation does your head in. i dont agree with it at all, but there may be a few in baptist circles that do, since we have have free will!!! Lol.
Since Baptists define a NT baptism as believer's baptism by immersion, that's probably how they would look at that verse.
Why would Baptists not define this one baptism according to 1 Corinthians 12:13, 'For in one Spirit we were all baptized into one body—Jews or Greeks, slaves or free—and all were made to drink of one Spirit' (ESV)?
Let me quote from a Baptist Confession of Faith.
The Baptist Confession of Faith (1689) With slight revisions by C. H. Spurgeon
10. Effectual Calling
1. Those whom God has predestinated to life, He is pleased in His appointed and accepted time to effectually call by His Word and Spirit, out of that state of sin and death which they are in by nature, to grace and salvation by Jesus Christ ....
2. This effectual call is of God's free and special grace alone, not on account of anything at all foreseen in man ....
3. Infants dying in infancy are regenerated and saved by Christ through the Spirit, Who works when, where, and how He pleases. So also are all elect persons who are incapable of being outwardly called by the ministry of the Word.
4. Others are not elected, although they may be called by the ministry of the Word, and may experience some common operations of the Spirit, yet because they are not effectually drawn by the Father, they will not and cannot truly come to Christ and therefore cannot be saved.
There are two things about all this that puzzle me, and I request clarification.
1. With respect to infants, I have heard it said that they are protected until they reach the age of responsibility. Having watched my son grow up, and now watching my grandkids grow up, I cannot help but wonder how the Bible defines the age of responsibility. With respect to my grandkids, what does the Bible say about how I can tell when each has reached that age, and therefore has lost that initial “infant” protection.
2. Unless of course, not all infants are among the elect – meaning some are preallocated to an eternity of screaming agony. If all infants belonged to the elect, they would not lose their protection at the age of responsibility. Would they?
Scripture does not contradict itself.
If you think it does, you the one confused or you reading it wrong, cos God is not the author of confusion.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?