• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Backstabing Russians?

nephilimiyr

I've Been Keepin My Eyes Wide Open
Jan 21, 2003
23,433
1,799
62
Wausau Wisconsin
Visit site
✟55,552.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
[font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]
[/font][font=Arial,Helvetica,Geneva,Swiss,SunSans-Regular]
April 1, 2003
NewsMax.com Wires

WASHINGTON – Russian military advisers have told Iraqi President Saddam Hussein and his government that the main Allied drive on Baghdad will not take place until mid-April and will then come around the west of the city, Russian journalists and analysts with strong links to Russian military intelligence now say.

Strikingly, the Russian analysts, whose work appears on the iraqwar.ru Web site, believe that U.S. and Allied forces are still overwhelmingly likely to win the war and that they are performing in a highly impressive manner. The reports are described as "based on the Russian military intelligence - the Main Intelligence Directorate or GRU - reports."

A March 31 report on the site revealed that Iraq was receiving analytical advice from Russian officials. "Russian military analysts are advising the Iraqi military command against excessive optimism," it said.

The Russian analysts stated: "There is no question that the U.S. 'blitzkrieg' failed to take control of Iraq and to destroy its army. It is clear that the Americans got bogged down in Iraq and that the military campaign hit a snag."

But they then went on to caution the Iraqis: "The Iraq command is now in danger of underestimating the enemy. For there is no reason to question the resolve of the Americans and their determination to reach the set goal - complete occupation of Iraq."

They continued: "Despite some obvious miscalculations and errors of the coalition's high command, the [Allied] troops that have entered Iraq maintain high combat readiness and are willing to fight. The initiative in the war remains firmly in the hands of the coalition."

Indeed, in a March 30 report the Russian analysts predicted, "The coalition is already planning a new large scale operation that will utilize the new forces currently being deployed in the region."

Russian intelligence believed "this large-scale operation will be launched from the general vicinity of Karabela and will develop into a wide maneuver around Baghdad from the west ending in the area of the Tartar lake east of al-Hadid - or east of the Tartar lake at Samarrah," the Russian analysts' report said.

"From this point a part of the force will continue advancing toward Saddam Hussein's home town of Tikrit and from there it will turn towards Baghdad from the north through Samarrah and Baahkuba; meanwhile the rest of the force will strike the rears of the Iraqi forces fighting in the north near Kirkuk and Mosul.

"Such an operation would require up to 60,000 troops, no less than 300 tanks and 200 helicopters," the Russian analysts concluded. "It is believed that such forces can be put together by April 15 and by April 18 they should be ready for to attack."

It remains to be seen, of course if the war will indeed follow this highly detailed prediction. Current reports indicate that U.S. forces are slowly closing in on Baghdad and probing for weaknesses in Iraqi defenses already.

What is certainly the case is that Iraqi resistance has been impressive and prolonged and that contrary to universally held U.S. media assumptions, and the confident expectations of Defense Department war planners, the Iraqis have succeeded in holding up and preventing U.S. conquest and occupation of all major cities to this point, almost two weeks into the war. The main, and bloodiest, clashes of the war are clearly still ahead.

With this in mind one other, sobering conclusion of the GRU analysts may prove significant. The March 30 report concluded, "Russian military analysts believe that the critical [point] for the U.S. duration of the war would be over 90 days" - in other words, after mid-June - "provided that during that time the coalition will sustain over 1,000 killed. Under such circumstances a serious political crisis in the U.S. and the world will be unavoidable."

Analysis by Martin Sieff, UPI senior news analyst.
http://www.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2003/4/1/154653.shtml
[/font]



I sure hope this isn't true! I need opinions on this article. I just am in shock right now and don't know what to believe.

True newsmax.com isn't the leader in the journalistic world but I have seen them to be right and fast coming with news stories in the past.
 

ACougar

U.S. Army Retired
Feb 7, 2003
16,795
1,295
Arizona
Visit site
✟45,452.00
Faith
Pagan
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
True, they have just rolled it up into one package. Frankly I don't think the war will last that long and that Bagdad will fall on or before the first of May. There were some bad decisions made at the onset of the invasion, thanksfully they haven't resulted in any large scale loss of life on our side. I'm tempted to think that we were almost trying to show what we could do with only two Divisions in Iraq, instead of insuring we had the overwelming firepower neded to bring this war to a quick end. We have 12 active Army Divisions, why else would we not go in with at least 5 or 6?

http://www.army.mil/installations/divisions.htm
 
Upvote 0

Michael0701

Harley Ridin' Believer!!
Nov 13, 2002
719
6
65
Tax Free Delaware!!
Visit site
✟23,417.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
My view is that they (the prez and Powell) really are trying to minimize casualties, if not for humanitarian reasons then for world opinion reasons. Let's face, as far as a blitzkreig goes, we could have bombed them back to the stone age, but didn't. I believe that he, contrary to what you hear in the press, really does care what the rest of the world thinks. I just pray that it works out that way, this is far from over.
 
Upvote 0

David Gould

Pearl Harbor sucked. WinAce didn't.
May 28, 2002
16,931
514
55
Canberra, Australia
Visit site
✟44,118.00
Faith
Atheist
Politics
AU-Labor
This 'intelligence analysis' is posted daily on the internet. Thus, the claim that they are advising the Iraqis could be considered correct - after all, if Saddam has access to the Internet, he could read it there.

But to me it simply looks like one of thousands of military analyses being released daily on the web, television, radio and in newspapers. Iraq can get great advice from Fox if they want to - after all, Fox releases details about US troop movements.
 
Upvote 0