Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
AZ megachurch to host Trump tomorrow (6/23) at the next stop on the Pandemic Hotspot Tour
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TLK Valentine" data-source="post: 75109374" data-attributes="member: 306134"><p>Actually, it was US Attorney Berman (federal position) who was fired, not NY Attorney General Letitia James (state position).</p><p></p><p>You see, US Attorneys investigate <em><strong>federal</strong> </em>crimes, and considering how many <em><strong>federal</strong></em> criminals have been on Donald's payroll, it would make sense he wouldn't want them investigated.</p><p></p><p>Refusing to wear a mask is a violation of a <em><strong>state</strong></em> executive order, and would be penalized on the <em><strong>state</strong></em> level. Besides, at least in NY, it was treated as a civil, not criminal, offense... no arrests, just a fine.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TLK Valentine, post: 75109374, member: 306134"] Actually, it was US Attorney Berman (federal position) who was fired, not NY Attorney General Letitia James (state position). You see, US Attorneys investigate [I][B]federal[/B] [/I]crimes, and considering how many [I][B]federal[/B][/I] criminals have been on Donald's payroll, it would make sense he wouldn't want them investigated. Refusing to wear a mask is a violation of a [I][B]state[/B][/I] executive order, and would be penalized on the [I][B]state[/B][/I] level. Besides, at least in NY, it was treated as a civil, not criminal, offense... no arrests, just a fine. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
AZ megachurch to host Trump tomorrow (6/23) at the next stop on the Pandemic Hotspot Tour
Top
Bottom